On Apr 28, 2:59 am, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Le mardi 27 avril 2010 à 15:49 -0700, basti a écrit :
Like many others before I stumbled over sympy's pattern matching. I'm
mainly interested in matching non-commutative expressions - which is
currently simply not implemented.
On Apr 30, 3:05 pm, basti basti...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2:59 am, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Le mardi 27 avril 2010 à 15:49 -0700, basti a écrit :
Like many others before I stumbled over sympy's pattern matching. I'm
mainly interested in matching non-commutative
On 28 avr, 02:59, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
This issue has been raised many times and I think nobody likes the
current situation. However, the current behaviour is quite convenient
when it works, and much code depends on it. I think that the best
solution is to distinguish
On Apr 28, 2:59 am, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
* Refactor whole matching logic into a separate module, and use the
Basic.match function only as interface. This was also done for
printing and I think the pattern matching is complex enough to justify
this step.
I don't
