Sounds great. Please post the slides (or if it is recorded, post
that) after your presentation. The abstract mentions that you will
talk about how SymPy started, and I am interested in learning about
that.
Otherwise, the favorite of mine from below is the sympyx core, because
I will be
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
>
> Sounds great. Please post the slides (or if it is recorded, post
> that) after your presentation. The abstract mentions that you will
> talk about how SymPy started, and I am interested in learning about
> that.
I have some stuff in s
I just wanted to check--will the patches for noncommutative numbers be
included in this release?
Thanks,
William
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> SymPy was accepted both for the tutorial and a 40 min talk at the
> SciPy 2009 conference:
>
> http://conference.sci
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:48 PM, william
ratcliff wrote:
> I just wanted to check--will the patches for noncommutative numbers be
> included in this release?
If you mean this:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1358
it didn't, as the patches are not ready yet. Fabian helped with t
Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:48 PM, william
> ratcliff wrote:
> > I just wanted to check--will the patches for noncommutative numbers be
> > included in this release?
>
> If you mean this:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/d
william ratcliff wrote:
> I just wanted to check--will the patches for noncommutative numbers be
> included in this release?
No if you are asking for the patches on issue
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1358
By the way, after the release I would like to start a discussion about
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> The absolute number one priority is:
>
> * merge Fabian's assumptions branch and get rid of the old assumptions
>
> if we didn't manage nothing else, we have to manage this, it's very,
> very important.
>
Although, I'm not so familiar with the internals of the new assump
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Toon
Verstraelen wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> The absolute number one priority is:
>>
>> * merge Fabian's assumptions branch and get rid of the old assumptions
>>
>> if we didn't manage nothing else, we have to manage this, it's very,
>> very important.
>>
>
