Consider the following short example:
http://nbviewer.ipython.org/urls/gist.githubusercontent.com/bjodah/720617780e83d7c35797/raw/c297ecf76a8e26a711b7c7868839f2dfb221bc10/gistfile1.txt
refine with Q.is_true(...) works ok for refining away Piecewise from a
solution (although it's a bit picky, e.g
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Björn Dahlgren wrote:
> Consider the following short example:
>
> http://nbviewer.ipython.org/urls/gist.githubusercontent.com/bjodah/720617780e83d7c35797/raw/c297ecf76a8e26a711b7c7868839f2dfb221bc10/gistfile1.txt
>
> refine with Q.is_true(...) works ok for refining
> > I looked for Q.is_false without luck, I also looked for an Inequality
> class
> > but found nothing.
>
> Wouldn't that just be ~Q.is_true? It seems to work for me. The !=
> class is called Unequality (to distinguish it from > "inequalities").
>
>
Yes, you are absolutely right - I always
Python doesn't allow "not" to return a symbolic object, so we have to
use ~ (which normally means bitwise not).
Aaron Meurer
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Björn Dahlgren wrote:
>
>> > I looked for Q.is_false without luck, I also looked for an Inequality
>> > class
>> > but found nothing.
>>
>
