Hi,
we just fixed the last bugs in the Mateusz's polys branch and pushed
it in our main git repo. All tests pass for all kinds of
configurations that I tried, but if possible, please test it (I didn't
test on Mac nor Windows).
Just to get some idea, Mateusz did about 150 patches and it implements
I tested many combinations (not all), and everything passes, except for this
doctest with -Qnew:
File "/users/aaronmeurer/documents/sympy/doc/src/tutorial.txt", line 147, in
tutorial.txt
Failed example:
1/2
Expected:
0
Got:
0.5
Is there a reverse to from __future__ import division t
Well, I went through all the blocking issues. Almost all of them were fixed,
but I could only close two of them because there don't seem to be tests for any
of the expressions that were giving problems before. Do we need to test old
trim() problems, considering trim() doesn't exist anymore?
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Well, I went through all the blocking issues. Almost all of them were fixed,
> but I could only close two of them because there don't seem to be tests for
> any of the expressions that were giving problems before. Do we need to test
> ol
On 2010-03-17, at 21:28, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
we just fixed the last bugs in the Mateusz's polys branch and pushed
it in our main git repo. All tests pass for all kinds of
configurations that I tried, but if possible, please test it (I didn't
test on Mac nor Windows).
Just to get some ide
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Ted Horst wrote:
>
> On 2010-03-17, at 21:28, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we just fixed the last bugs in the Mateusz's polys branch and pushed
>> it in our main git repo. All tests pass for all kinds of
>> configurations that I tried, but if possible, pleas
