On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:53:41AM +0200, Friedrich Hagedorn wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:02:54PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Kirill Smelkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:24:33PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:53:41AM +0200, Friedrich Hagedorn wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:02:54PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Kirill Smelkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:24:33PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:02:54PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Kirill Smelkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:24:33PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Fredrik Johansson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:53:41AM +0200, Friedrich Hagedorn wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:02:54PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Kirill Smelkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:56:21PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
In [1]: Eq(z, ==, x/y)
Out[1]:
x
z = ─
y
Why does it make sense to cover all equalities and inequalities by
this one operator Eq? The present syntax is to me like spelling x*y+z
as Add(Add(x,'*',y), '+', z) Doesn't it make more sense to define
separate Eq, Ne, Lt, Le, Gt, Ge operators?
Fredrik
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 05:05:47PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:56:21PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
In
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:19:27PM +0200, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
Why does it make sense to cover all equalities and inequalities by
this one operator Eq? The present syntax is to me like spelling x*y+z
as Add(Add(x,'*',y), '+', z) Doesn't it make more sense to define
:-)
separate Eq,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Fredrik Johansson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does it make sense to cover all equalities and inequalities by
this one operator Eq? The present syntax is to me like spelling x*y+z
as Add(Add(x,'*',y), '+', z) Doesn't it make more sense to define
separate
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:24:33PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Fredrik Johansson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does it make sense to cover all equalities and inequalities by
this one operator Eq? The present syntax is to me like spelling x*y+z
as
Hello,
how can I pretty print an equation like
x
z = -
y
My attempt fails:
In [1]: var('x y z')
Out[1]: (x, y, z)
In [2]: pretty(z==x/y)
Out[2]: False
For some month ago this works.
By,
Friedrich
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
how can I pretty print an equation like
x
z = -
y
My attempt fails:
In [1]: var('x y z')
Out[1]: (x, y, z)
In [2]: pretty(z==x/y)
Out[2]: False
For some month ago this works.
==
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:47:49PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
how can I pretty print an equation like
x
z = -
y
My attempt fails:
In [1]: var('x y z')
Out[1]: (x, y, z)
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:47:49PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
how can I pretty print an equation like
14 matches
Mail list logo
