Comment #24 on issue 1358 by wflynny: (e*f*e*f).subs(e*f,f*e+h) fails if
e*f is not commutative
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1358
Nevermind. I reread the development/patch writing tutorial and they are
xfails. I
refreshed my repository this morning and was working on that.
Comment #31 on issue 1455 by ondrej.certik: Split expand so that it only
expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
Ok, I suggest to get aaron's patches in --- aaron, where is your latest
branch? I'll
do final review and push it in, if all is ok.
--
You
Comment #23 on issue 1358 by ondrej.certik: (e*f*e*f).subs(e*f,f*e+h) fails
if e*f is not commutative
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1358
Hi wflynny,
no test should fail in our master branch. If that is so, could you please
post the
full session? Also, are you using the lat
Comment #8 on issue 1480 by ondrej.certik: Implement test coverage utility
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1480
I downloaded the tar.gz from the pypi and did the usual:
python setup.py install --home=~/usr
that's what I do.
--
You received this message because you are listed i
Comment #6 on issue 1486 by ondrej.certik: Tests for sympy.logic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1486
That applies cleanly for me --- it's +1 from me.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
Comment #30 on issue 1455 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Split expand so that it
only expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
Let's commit your code, I'll give it a try later. Showing code is better
than talking
about it. :)
Does basic have default hints a sub
Comment #22 on issue 1358 by wflynny: (e*f*e*f).subs(e*f,f*e+h) fails if
e*f is not commutative
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1358
Assuming that those failed utilities\pytest.py tests are acceptable, I have
only a
couple more comments on this:
The tests for the chebyshev p
Comment #3 on issue 1485 by ondrej.certik: new logic module (TODO before
0.6.5)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1485
Please do so then. The warning is annoying.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred
Comment #29 on issue 1455 by asmeurer: Split expand so that it only expands
a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
How does this work if someone wants to implement their own expand method
for a class that they wrote? With
my patch, they just have to write an
Comment #21 on issue 1358 by wflynny: (e*f*e*f).subs(e*f,f*e+h) fails if
e*f is not commutative
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1358
Hey,
I figured out how to run py.test, etc. But I do have one question:
When I run py.test.exe on the newest repository, it fails the same test
Comment #7 on issue 1480 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Implement test coverage
utility
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1480
The module is on PyPI (http://pypi.python.org/pypi), you can search for it
there. Its
website is http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage/ but the easiest way
Comment #5 on issue 1486 by fab...@fseoane.net: Tests for sympy.logic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1486
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Attachments:
0002-Full-test-coverage-for-sympy.logic.patch 7.5 KB
--
You received this message because you are listed in
Comment #4 on issue 1486 by fab...@fseoane.net: Tests for sympy.logic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1486
Many thanks!. Looks good, just:
- do we really need those assert ?, Now that code is tested and works
fine I think
we can delete them
I attach a reworked patch, in wh
Comment #6 on issue 1480 by fab...@fseoane.net: Implement test coverage
utility
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1480
seems i am missing module coverage. Where is this ?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Updates:
Labels: Logic
Comment #3 on issue 1486 by fab...@fseoane.net: Tests for sympy.logic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1486
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or bec
Comment #5 on issue 1480 by fab...@fseoane.net: Implement test coverage
utility
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1480
i get an error when running ./bin/coverage_report.py
[atlantis 234] ~/dev/sympy > ./bin/coverage_report.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./bin/cov
Updates:
Owner: fab...@fseoane.net
Comment #2 on issue 1486 by fab...@fseoane.net: Tests for sympy.logic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1486
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this i
Comment #28 on issue 1455 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Split expand so that it
only expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
It would be more flexible if "what" can be a list, so maybe rather
what = set(what)
if 'mul' in what:
...
--
You re
Comment #27 on issue 1455 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Split expand so that it
only expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
I propose to use a single expand method.
def _eval_expand(self, what='basic', deep=True, **hints):
sargs, terms = self.arg
Updates:
Owner: ---
Comment #2 on issue 1284 by fab...@fseoane.net: more tests for the solvers
module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1284
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this is
Comment #2 on issue 1485 by fab...@fseoane.net: new logic module (TODO
before 0.6.5)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1485
Thanks for the patch, but I think it would be better to just erase the
__init__
method and put anything relevant in eval(), as we do in the other classes.
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.6.5
Comment #5 on issue 1483 by fab...@fseoane.net: no xor in sympy.core.basic
for new logic module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1483
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in
22 matches
Mail list logo