Issue 1526 in sympy: simplification using trigsimp

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1526 by chr.schu...@gmx.de: simplification using trigsimp http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1526 Hi, I am trying to calculate Mass Matrices using sympy. As soon as rotations are involved I always encounter

Issue 1495 in sympy: minus problem

Updates: Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High Comment #2 on issue 1495 by smichr: minus problem http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1495 I got an infinite recursion from could_extract_minus_sign() when checking the expression: x*(-2*a*x - 2*x**3). I also note that the

Issue 1526 in sympy: simplification using trigsimp

Updates: Status: Accepted Cc: hazelnusse Comment #1 on issue 1526 by ondrej.certik: simplification using trigsimp http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1526 We are working with Luke (CCed) on a trig simplification code, that should handle this too. Luke, any

Issue 1527 in sympy: bug in the printer (function + subs)

Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High New issue 1527 by ondrej.certik: bug in the printer (function + subs) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1527 In [1]: F = Function('F') In [2]: x, y, t = symbols('x y t') In [3]: a = Symbol('a', Real=True) In [4]: eq

Issue 1527 in sympy: bug in the printer (function + subs)

Updates: Cc: plaes800 Comment #1 on issue 1527 by plaes800: bug in the printer (function + subs) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1527 Actually it is the bug in subs as it also seems to be substituting the variable used for differentiating: print sub.args gives:

Issue 1052 in sympy: 2.0 * x**2 should print more nicely

Comment #41 on issue 1052 by ceyhuneksin: 2.0 * x**2 should print more nicely http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1052 Hey, I am kind of new to SymPy, sorry if I am making a naive comment but I noticed that exactly the same defect exists in latex print i.e. latex(x**0.25) gives

Issue 1052 in sympy: 2.0 * x**2 should print more nicely

Comment #42 on issue 1052 by ondrej.certik: 2.0 * x**2 should print more nicely http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1052 Which version of sympy do you use? It seems to work for me with the latest git version: In [1]: latex(x**0.25) Out[1]: $x^{0.25}$ -- You received this

Issue 1496 in sympy: Pow does not properly extract (-1)**n as Mul does

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 1496 by ondrej.certik: Pow does not properly extract (-1)**n as Mul does http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1496 Patch is in, thanks! -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue,

Issue 1528 in sympy: Fix any/all import to work correctly with Python 3.0

Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview New issue 1528 by asmeurer: Fix any/all import to work correctly with Python 3.0 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1528 Currently utilities/__init__.py imports SymPy versions of any() and all() if

Issue 1528 in sympy: Fix any/all import to work correctly with Python 3.0

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 1528 by ondrej.certik: Fix any/all import to work correctly with Python 3.0 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1528 Thanks, it's in. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or