Comment #9 on issue 1591 by ondrej.certik: More strict doctests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1591
I would strongly suggest to only use explicit imports everywhere, otherwise
it will
just lead to problems later anyways.
--
You received this message because you are listed in
Comment #8 on issue 1591 by smichr: More strict doctests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1591
Note: the runtest_3 branch has some changes to doctests that could not be
handled
with a simple "from sympy import *"--those should probably be applied
before anyone
begins work. Ide
Updates:
Cc: asmeurer
Comment #7 on issue 1591 by smichr: More strict doctests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1591
As soon as we know which direction we are to go in terms of allowing "from
sympy
import *" or not, the 40 files which need some work are listed below. The
Updates:
Cc: ondrej.certik
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 1698 by smichr: why the assert on cols>lines in
Matrix.nullspace()?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1698
When I tried the test above, I got a deprecation warning on making the
matrix this
way,
Updates:
Summary: runtests modifications and docstring corrections
Comment #27 on issue 1671 by smichr: runtests modifications and docstring
corrections
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1671
With the ability to test more of the repo, failures that hadn't been
detected
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #11 on issue 1686 by Vinzent.Steinberg: collect() doesn't always
collect derivatives correctly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1686
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the own
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #10 on issue 1686 by smichr: collect() doesn't always collect
derivatives correctly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1686
Collection is being done on different entities:
r = collect(reduced_eq, f(x), exact = True).match(a*df
Comment #20 on issue 1467 by Vinzent.Steinberg: sorting values with
imaginary numbers in radical
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1467
In my opinion, comparison (and sorting) of non-reals should fail. For
canonical
sorting we should create our own function. Something like:
>>
Comment #16 on issue 93 by asmeurer: Square root denesting
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=93
Do you mean interactive code that you have on your computer? It would
probably help anyway if you could
upload it to a branch on github. What are the parts that are not
automatic?
Comment #15 on issue 93 by jnebos: Square root denesting
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=93
I translated the thoughts document in English, so I dare upload it. For
your reading pleasure ;-)
I am happy to discuss things, but I don't think I can code everything.
(There is some
Comment #19 on issue 1467 by asmeurer: sorting values with imaginary
numbers in radical
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1467
OK, so I was looking for sorted([3, I]) instead of sorted([3, sqrt(I)]).
Based on a quick git bisect, the second one
was fixed with this commit:
b3f7e
Comment #18 on issue 1467 by asmeurer: sorting values with imaginary
numbers in radical
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1467
I tried a bunch of commits all the way back to the first one in the
repository, and they all give:
In [1]: sorted([3,I])
Out[1]: [3, I]
So I think th
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 1686 by asmeurer: collect() doesn't always collect
derivatives correctly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1686
Indeed. I hadn't noticed that you had added the exact flag to all of the
collects in ode.py. Why do you have
mult
Comment #26 on issue 1671 by smichr: runtests modifications for Windows
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1671
I applied it and all still works. I also added wildcard matching ala
fnmatch so
filenames matching a pattern can be selected, too. pushed to the runtest_2
branch at
sm
Comment #8 on issue 1686 by smichr: collect() doesn't always collect
derivatives correctly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1686
See comment 2 above. I think if you use the exact flag you get what you
want so maybe
this issue can be closed.
--
You received this message becaus
Updates:
Cc: Vinzent.Steinberg
Comment #5 on issue 1689 by smichr: Sympify inconsistency between reals and
complexes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1689
I'm not sure what the preferred way of updating a branch dedicated to an
issue is,
but I modified the patch accord
16 matches
Mail list logo
