Updates:
Summary: more efficient core
Comment #7 on issue 1908 by Vinzent.Steinberg: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
sympyx seems to be what we want. Do we need to get rid of the old
assumptions before
merging it?
--
You received this message
Comment #10 on issue 489 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: typical_range in Symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=489
I don't think this a good idea to overload Symbol with this and I don't see
how it
can be properly formalised.
OTOH, having interval arithmetic and random variables
Comment #8 on issue 1908 by asmeurer: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
Yeah, that was the other conclusion we came to.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #9 on issue 103 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Basic.__lt__ and
Basic.__gt__ and "py.test -l"
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=103
py.test doesn't even work any more, so this is now irrelevant.
--
You received this message because you are lis
Comment #59 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is
too aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
I'm getting failures for the 1766 branch. Actually it hangs somewhere when
your try
to run the tests:
[...]
sympy/solvers/tests/test_numeric.py[1]
Comment #11 on issue 489 by Vinzent.Steinberg: typical_range in Symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=489
I would just implement it as a subclass of Symbol.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this
Comment #60 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is
too aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
Issue 1909 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because y
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1766
Comment #6 on issue 1909 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Expand function does not
deal with non-commutative multiplication and powers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1909
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You receiv
Comment #1 on issue 1910 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Update --help for bin/test
and bin/doctest with glob information
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1910
Looks good, but you should fix the lowercase at the beginning of sentences.
--
You received this message because you are listed
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #31 on issue 1778 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Rational from string can be
improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778
Thanks, looks good, all the tests pass...
-if isinstance(obj,tuple) and len(obj)==2:
+
Updates:
Blockedon: 1884
Comment #9 on issue 1908 by Vinzent.Steinberg: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or beca
Issue 1884: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
This issue is now blocking issue 1908.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you star
Updates:
Status: Started
Blockedon: 1778
Comment #19 on issue 1374 by Vinzent.Steinberg: simplify(x**2-x**2.0) does
not yield 0.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1374
rsimplify() from issue 1778 should fix this. (I'm -1 on doing this
automatically.)
--
You r
Issue 1778: Rational from string can be improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778
This issue is now blocking issue 1374.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1374
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or be
Updates:
Cc: robert.kern
Comment #12 on issue 1264 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Discrepancies between
running the full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
If we don't know how to reproduce this, we have to close this issue.
Robert, can you
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1911 by alberthilbert: Error in expansion of power with
noncommutative base
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1911
Expansion of powers with noncommutative Mul as base is wrong:
x = Symbol('x', commutative=Fa
Comment #2 on issue 1910 by asmeurer: Update --help for bin/test and
bin/doctest with glob information
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1910
Yes, that was intentional because it was referring to the text
from "bin/test [options …] [files …]". Maybe I
should put them in quot
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Cc: smichr
Mergedinto: 1766
Comment #1 on issue 1911 by asmeurer: Error in expansion of power with
noncommutative base
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1911
Yes, I think expand should definitely return x*y*x*y*x*y. That is the
Comment #61 on issue 1766 by asmeurer: expand(power_base=True) is too
aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
Issue 1911 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starre
Comment #13 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
With difficulty, yes. I will try to reduce it down to a script that can be
run, but it is hard to do.
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: New
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.5 Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #14 on issue 1263 by robert.kern: Invalid movement of roots across
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263
The bug seems to be back:
In [2]: z = Symbol('z', real=True,
Comment #14 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
Drop test_wester.py into sympy/core/tests/. Run show_issue1264.py .
Attachments:
show_issue1264.py 360 bytes
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Cc: smichr
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #15 on issue 1263 by asmeurer: Invalid movement of roots across
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263
I bisected, and this is the bad commit (between 0.6.5 and 0.6.6):
3a1aa58ed
Comment #32 on issue 1778 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Rational from string can
be improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778
* I don't like the name of rsimplify: what it does appears unrelated to
simplification and there's a possible confusion with ratsimp.
* I think Rationa
Comment #16 on issue 1263 by mattpap: Invalid movement of roots across
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263
Also, it looks like the problem is in cancel:
In [1]: z = Symbol('z', real=True, negative=True)
In [2]: sqrt(1/z)
Out[2]:
___
/ 1
/ -
\/ z
In
Comment #15 on issue 1264 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Discrepancies between
running the full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
Thanks, I created a branch from this, you can pull from:
git://github.com/vks/sympy.git testfail
I'm getting these fa
Comment #16 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
The failures in test_wester.py are unimportant (at least for this bug). I'm
not sure which of those tests are causing
the fa
Comment #17 on issue 1264 by asmeurer: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
This is possibly related to issue 1747.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this iss
Comment #18 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
Seems quite likely.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because yo
Updates:
Cc: asmeurer Ronan.Lamy robert.kern
Comment #4 on issue 1747 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: nseries test failure with
bin/test --random
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1747
Issue 1264 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are lis
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1747
Comment #19 on issue 1264 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Discrepancies between
running the full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
It's still I11 that causes the problem:
In [1]: limit((tan
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #3 on issue 1756 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Division by order terms
is invalid
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1756
The best way to solve this would probably be to scrap the Order class and
replace it
with an object repre
32 matches
Mail list logo