Re: Issue 1908 in sympy: more efficient core

Updates: Summary: more efficient core Comment #7 on issue 1908 by Vinzent.Steinberg: more efficient core http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908 sympyx seems to be what we want. Do we need to get rid of the old assumptions before merging it? -- You received this message

Re: Issue 489 in sympy: typical_range in Symbols

Comment #10 on issue 489 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: typical_range in Symbols http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=489 I don't think this a good idea to overload Symbol with this and I don't see how it can be properly formalised. OTOH, having interval arithmetic and random variables

Re: Issue 1908 in sympy: more efficient core

Comment #8 on issue 1908 by asmeurer: more efficient core http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908 Yeah, that was the other conclusion we came to. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may

Re: Issue 103 in sympy: Basic.__lt__ and Basic.__gt__ and "py.test -l"

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #9 on issue 103 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Basic.__lt__ and Basic.__gt__ and "py.test -l" http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=103 py.test doesn't even work any more, so this is now irrelevant. -- You received this message because you are lis

Re: Issue 1766 in sympy: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive

Comment #59 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766 I'm getting failures for the 1766 branch. Actually it hangs somewhere when your try to run the tests: [...] sympy/solvers/tests/test_numeric.py[1]

Re: Issue 489 in sympy: typical_range in Symbols

Comment #11 on issue 489 by Vinzent.Steinberg: typical_range in Symbols http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=489 I would just implement it as a subclass of Symbol. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this

Re: Issue 1766 in sympy: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive

Comment #60 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766 Issue 1909 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because y

Re: Issue 1909 in sympy: Expand function does not deal with non-commutative multiplication and powers

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 1766 Comment #6 on issue 1909 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Expand function does not deal with non-commutative multiplication and powers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1909 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You receiv

Re: Issue 1910 in sympy: Update --help for bin/test and bin/doctest with glob information

Comment #1 on issue 1910 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Update --help for bin/test and bin/doctest with glob information http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1910 Looks good, but you should fix the lowercase at the beginning of sentences. -- You received this message because you are listed

Re: Issue 1778 in sympy: Rational from string can be improved

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #31 on issue 1778 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Rational from string can be improved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778 Thanks, looks good, all the tests pass... -if isinstance(obj,tuple) and len(obj)==2: +

Re: Issue 1908 in sympy: more efficient core

Updates: Blockedon: 1884 Comment #9 on issue 1908 by Vinzent.Steinberg: more efficient core http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or beca

Re: Issue 1884 in sympy: remove old assumptions

Issue 1884: remove old assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884 This issue is now blocking issue 1908. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you star

Re: Issue 1374 in sympy: simplify(x**2-x**2.0) does not yield 0.

Updates: Status: Started Blockedon: 1778 Comment #19 on issue 1374 by Vinzent.Steinberg: simplify(x**2-x**2.0) does not yield 0. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1374 rsimplify() from issue 1778 should fix this. (I'm -1 on doing this automatically.) -- You r

Re: Issue 1778 in sympy: Rational from string can be improved

Issue 1778: Rational from string can be improved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778 This issue is now blocking issue 1374. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1374 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or be

Re: Issue 1264 in sympy: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests

Updates: Cc: robert.kern Comment #12 on issue 1264 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264 If we don't know how to reproduce this, we have to close this issue. Robert, can you

Issue 1911 in sympy: Error in expansion of power with noncommutative base

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1911 by alberthilbert: Error in expansion of power with noncommutative base http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1911 Expansion of powers with noncommutative Mul as base is wrong: x = Symbol('x', commutative=Fa

Re: Issue 1910 in sympy: Update --help for bin/test and bin/doctest with glob information

Comment #2 on issue 1910 by asmeurer: Update --help for bin/test and bin/doctest with glob information http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1910 Yes, that was intentional because it was referring to the text from "bin/test [options …] [files …]". Maybe I should put them in quot

Re: Issue 1911 in sympy: Error in expansion of power with noncommutative base

Updates: Status: Duplicate Cc: smichr Mergedinto: 1766 Comment #1 on issue 1911 by asmeurer: Error in expansion of power with noncommutative base http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1911 Yes, I think expand should definitely return x*y*x*y*x*y. That is the

Re: Issue 1766 in sympy: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive

Comment #61 on issue 1766 by asmeurer: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766 Issue 1911 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starre

Re: Issue 1264 in sympy: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests

Comment #13 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264 With difficulty, yes. I will try to reduce it down to a script that can be run, but it is hard to do. -- You received this

Re: Issue 1263 in sympy: Invalid movement of roots across fractions

Updates: Status: New Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.5 Milestone-Release0.7.0 Comment #14 on issue 1263 by robert.kern: Invalid movement of roots across fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263 The bug seems to be back: In [2]: z = Symbol('z', real=True,

Re: Issue 1264 in sympy: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests

Comment #14 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264 Drop test_wester.py into sympy/core/tests/. Run show_issue1264.py . Attachments: show_issue1264.py 360 bytes

Re: Issue 1263 in sympy: Invalid movement of roots across fractions

Updates: Status: Accepted Cc: smichr Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #15 on issue 1263 by asmeurer: Invalid movement of roots across fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263 I bisected, and this is the bad commit (between 0.6.5 and 0.6.6): 3a1aa58ed

Re: Issue 1778 in sympy: Rational from string can be improved

Comment #32 on issue 1778 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Rational from string can be improved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778 * I don't like the name of rsimplify: what it does appears unrelated to simplification and there's a possible confusion with ratsimp. * I think Rationa

Re: Issue 1263 in sympy: Invalid movement of roots across fractions

Comment #16 on issue 1263 by mattpap: Invalid movement of roots across fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263 Also, it looks like the problem is in cancel: In [1]: z = Symbol('z', real=True, negative=True) In [2]: sqrt(1/z) Out[2]: ___ / 1 / - \/ z In

Re: Issue 1264 in sympy: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests

Comment #15 on issue 1264 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264 Thanks, I created a branch from this, you can pull from: git://github.com/vks/sympy.git testfail I'm getting these fa

Re: Issue 1264 in sympy: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests

Comment #16 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264 The failures in test_wester.py are unimportant (at least for this bug). I'm not sure which of those tests are causing the fa

Re: Issue 1264 in sympy: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests

Comment #17 on issue 1264 by asmeurer: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264 This is possibly related to issue 1747. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this iss

Re: Issue 1264 in sympy: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests

Comment #18 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264 Seems quite likely. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because yo

Re: Issue 1747 in sympy: nseries test failure with bin/test --random

Updates: Cc: asmeurer Ronan.Lamy robert.kern Comment #4 on issue 1747 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: nseries test failure with bin/test --random http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1747 Issue 1264 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are lis

Re: Issue 1264 in sympy: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 1747 Comment #19 on issue 1264 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Discrepancies between running the full test suite and individual tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264 It's still I11 that causes the problem: In [1]: limit((tan

Re: Issue 1756 in sympy: Division by order terms is invalid

Updates: Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0 Comment #3 on issue 1756 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Division by order terms is invalid http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1756 The best way to solve this would probably be to scrap the Order class and replace it with an object repre