Issue 2095 in sympy: Ana Flores solution for quartic equation is broken

2010-11-02 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2095 by smichr: Ana Flores solution for quartic equation is broken http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2095 In the quasisymmetric solution of the quartic the coefficient d = (c/a)**2 is identified as m**2.

Re: Issue 2085 in sympy: Limit code severely broken.

2010-11-02 Thread sympy
Comment #12 on issue 2085 by nicolas.pourcelot: Limit code severely broken. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2085 +1 for returning NaN instead of sin(oo) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, sen

Re: Issue 2085 in sympy: Limit code severely broken.

2010-11-02 Thread sympy
Comment #13 on issue 2085 by pevzi23: Limit code severely broken. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2085 I think we should simply tell limit to N() a resulting expression: In [16]: N(sin(oo)) Out[16]: nan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: Comment on GSoC2009 in sympy

2010-11-02 Thread sympy
Comment by kei...@live.co.uk: just speed me back up to normeal For more information: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/wiki/GSoC2009 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.co

Re: Issue 2085 in sympy: Limit code severely broken.

2010-11-02 Thread sympy
Comment #14 on issue 2085 by asmeurer: Limit code severely broken. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2085 Why would we want to do that? Then we get a numerical result when we could have had a symbolic one. By the way, in Maple: sin(infinity);

Re: Issue 2014 in sympy: sympy.solvers.solvers.solve should also allow frozenset to hold equations

2010-11-02 Thread sympy
Comment #12 on issue 2014 by smichr: sympy.solvers.solvers.solve should also allow frozenset to hold equations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2014 I'm +1/2 with comments below. I have often thought that listing all iterable types was kind of a clunky way to test for iterabi