Re: Issue 2133 in sympy: Merge new polynomials manipulation module

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #18 on issue 2133 by mattpap: Merge new polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133 In 99e4eab95ee98ebc7cdcbdb7e60c6206a822e81a I updated the tests (in one case the solution is now

Re: Issue 2153 in sympy: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: smichr NeedsReview Comment #2 on issue 2153 by smichr: min_ doesn't implement evaluation for its arguments unless they are Numbers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2153 It's a little subtle to reproduce the current behavior inline. It's probably

Re: Issue 2133 in sympy: Merge new polynomials manipulation module

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: Ronan.Lamy Vinzent.Steinberg Comment #19 on issue 2133 by asmeurer: Merge new polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133 I bisected the sqrt(2) thing down to this commit, which seems unrelated: commit

Re: Issue 2133 in sympy: Merge new polynomials manipulation module

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #20 on issue 2133 by asmeurer: Merge new polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133 OK, there is already at least on test failure: ___

Re: Issue 2133 in sympy: Merge new polynomials manipulation module

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Comment #21 on issue 2133 by asmeurer: Merge new polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133 So it turns out that those other test failures are not tox related. The first one only shows up when running the full test suite; when testing

Re: Issue 2133 in sympy: Merge new polynomials manipulation module

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Comment #22 on issue 2133 by asmeurer: Merge new polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133 There is an ode failure in 64-bit: ___ sympy/solvers/tests/test_ode.py:test_1st_homogeneous_coeff_ode2 File

Re: Issue 2133 in sympy: Merge new polynomials manipulation module

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Comment #23 on issue 2133 by asmeurer: Merge new polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133 By the way, the RootSum failure is 32-bit only. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to

Re: Issue 2133 in sympy: Merge new polynomials manipulation module

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Comment #24 on issue 2133 by asmeurer: Merge new polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133 OK. Additional failures in Python2.4 (32-bit, python ground types): _ sympy/core/tests/test_expr.py:test_as_ordered_terms __

Re: Issue 2133 in sympy: Merge new polynomials manipulation module

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Comment #25 on issue 2133 by asmeurer: Merge new polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133 Is your release0.7.0 branch still necessary, or have you merged all of those commits with polys12? -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Issue 1592 in sympy: Pretty print Sum with a Sigma

2011-01-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-Medium Comment #1 on issue 1592 by asmeurer: Pretty print Sum with a Sigma http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1592 We should also improve the pretty printing of RootSum to print a Sigma. Maple does something like this: