Re: Issue 2282 in sympy: doctests broken by the commit edabb89c5006a7

Comment #5 on issue 2282 by gdrummo...@gmail.com: doctests broken by the commit edabb89c5006a7 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2282 Inradius should be positive? This negative result is because the area calculation for a polygon is dependent on the ordering of the points.

Re: Issue 2282 in sympy: doctests broken by the commit edabb89c5006a7

Comment #6 on issue 2282 by gdrummo...@gmail.com: doctests broken by the commit edabb89c5006a7 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2282 Simplified inradius example as per Ronan's request. This is also in pull request 212. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/212 -- You received

Re: Issue 2282 in sympy: doctests broken by the commit edabb89c5006a7

Comment #7 on issue 2282 by gdrummo...@gmail.com: doctests broken by the commit edabb89c5006a7 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2282 Also just noticed that this issue duplicates 2258. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2258 -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 2258 in sympy: doctest fails in master

Comment #9 on issue 2258 by gdrummo...@gmail.com: doctest fails in master http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2258 This error appears to be system dependent. It has also been raised in issue 2282. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2282 Following Chris's suggestion,

Issue 2288 in sympy: Triangle.inradius incorrect

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2288 by gdrummo...@gmail.com: Triangle.inradius incorrect http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2288 The inradius for 3-4-5 triangle should be 1. Triangle(Point(0, 0), Point(4, 0), Point(4, 3)).inradius 1/2 Easy

Re: Issue 2282 in sympy: doctests broken by the commit edabb89c5006a7

Updates: Cc: elliso...@gmail.com Comment #8 on issue 2282 by asmeurer: doctests broken by the commit edabb89c5006a7 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2282 Issue 2258 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2258 in sympy: doctest fails in master

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2282 Comment #10 on issue 2258 by asmeurer: doctest fails in master http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2258 See also issue 2282, which is a duplicate of this one. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2217 in sympy: Patches tutorial

Comment #21 on issue 2217 by asmeurer: Patches tutorial http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2217 The Pushing patches page is fairly recent. Someone created it based on some notes I left someone who had just obtained push access. I guess we never actually linked to it in any

Re: Issue 2287 in sympy: factorization of rationals

Updates: Cc: matt...@gmail.com Labels: Polynomial Simplify Comment #1 on issue 2287 by asmeurer: factorization of rationals http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2287 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 1916 in sympy: Plotting fails: Window initialization failed: Unable to share contexts

Comment #18 on issue 1916 by keith.ku...@gmail.com: Plotting fails: Window initialization failed: Unable to share contexts http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1916 i still have the problem even after testing the os.environ call on sympy-0.6.7. I also tested the example script