Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2361 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.flatten needs to watch for the
unevaluated Mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2361
1>> 9*x/(4*(1 - y))
9*x/(4 - 4*y)
2>> d = Mul(4, 1 - y, evaluate
Comment #4 on issue 2307 by asmeurer: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and
as_coeff_Mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307
If you want to see it, see
https://github.com/asmeurer/sympy/tree/as_coeff_Mul-remove. I have done
everything for the merge (I converted as_coeff_Mu
Updates:
Cc: smi...@gmail.com
Comment #3 on issue 2307 by asmeurer: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and
as_coeff_Mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307
There's a difference with how the handle Real coefficients:
In [1]: (4.0*x).as_coeff_mul()
Out[1]: (1, (4.0, x))
Comment #2 on issue 2307 by asmeurer: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and
as_coeff_Mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307
as_coeff_mul() is used all over the place. as_coeff_Mul() is only used in
a few places.
The docstring of as_coeff_Mul only says that it is there to
Updates:
Labels: Polynomial
Comment #3 on issue 2306 by asmeurer: Duplicate implementation of factorial
in sympy/core/numbers.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2306
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Comment #2 on issue 2306 by asmeurer: Duplicate implementation of factorial
in sympy/core/numbers.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2306
You can try it at https://github.com/asmeurer/sympy/tree/ifactorial-remove.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #1 on issue 2306 by asmeurer: Duplicate implementation of factorial
in sympy/core/numbers.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2306
I can't figure out how to import
sympy.functions.combintorial.factorials.factorial in
sympy/polys/domains/groundtypes.py without gettin
Comment #9 on issue 1721 by asmeurer: Rename class 'Real'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1721
Ronan, can you redo this now?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-issues@goog
Comment #1 on issue 2304 by asmeurer: Remove Pure from top-level namespace
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2304
So is the issue just to remove Pure from __init__.py?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to th
Comment #16 on issue 2303 by asmeurer: Function to access the oeis database
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303
I like Vinzent's idea. Have it return the string by default, and oeis(seq,
open=True) will open it in the browser.
--
You received this message because you are su
Comment #26 on issue 1735 by asmeurer: Rename .func attribute (.args too?)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1735
What needs to be done here?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sy
Comment #2 on issue 543 by asmeurer: warnings on python setup.py build
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=543
This is still an issue:
package init file 'sympy/assumptions/tests/__init__.py' not found (or not a
regular file)
package init file 'sympy/concrete/tests/__init__.py' not
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #14 on issue 533 by asmeurer: credits: use alphabetical order +
automatic statistics
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=533
Not sure how I feel about this. I like having the authors in order in the
README. And the statistics are very u
Comment #2 on issue 2360 by asmeurer: Bug in geometry intersection
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2360
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/298.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send em
Issue 2360: Bug in geometry intersection
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2360
This issue is now blocking issue 2203.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2203
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because yo
Updates:
Labels: -PassedReview NeedsReview asmeurer
Blockedon: 2360
Comment #9 on issue 2203 by asmeurer: doctest does not test IPython
interactive sessions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2203
I have fixed the rest at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/298.
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #26 on issue 2217 by asmeurer: Patches tutorial
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2217
I have a patch removing the patches tutorial from the docs at
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/298.
--
You received this message becau
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #3 on issue 2358 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: keep_sign should be cached
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2358
Issue 2151 has just been fixed, so this is now irrelevant.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #20 on issue 2151 by asmeurer: BasicMeta.keep_sign
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2151
It's in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Geometry WrongResult
New issue 2360 by asmeurer: Bug in geometry intersection
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2360
I found a bug when fixing issue 2203. There is a doctest in
doc/src/modules/geometry.txt that
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview mattpap Ronan.Lamy
Comment #19 on issue 2151 by asmeurer: BasicMeta.keep_sign
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2151
It doesn't look like this was ever linked to here. The fix is at
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/296
--
You received th
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #10 on issue 1576 by asmeurer: Integral of strictly positive
function is zero
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1576
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/297.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #7 on issue 2150 by asmeurer: integrate gives wrong result
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2150
The fix is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/297.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #9 on issue 1892 by asmeurer: integrate(1/(x*(a+b*x)**3), x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1892
My patch from issue 1793 unfortunately makes the output of this a little
more complicated, but it is still correct:
In
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Printing
New issue 2359 by asmeurer: Should Pow(expr, S(1)/2) print as sqrt(expr)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2359
It's annoying to have sqrt(expr) print as expr**(1/2), because have to
always convert that
Comment #6 on issue 2150 by asmeurer: integrate gives wrong result
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2150
With Mateusz's auto keyword to div() commit, this now returns a result.
Unfortunately, it is wrong! (in master)
In [1]: integrate(1/(x**2 + y**2), x)
Out[1]:
⎛ⅈ⋅y
Comment #14 on issue 1077 by christian.muise: ask(pi, exp(rational), etc.,
Q.algebraic) should return False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
Well if anyone is putting in changes to the new assumption system, it can
be done as follows:
If new predicate is being introduc
Comment #17 on issue 1028 by asmeurer: Sum().doit() doesn't do it
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1028
You are correct in that the summation algorithms are similar to the
integration algorithms (for example, the Karr algorithm has been called the
counterpart to the Risch algo
Comment #13 on issue 1077 by asmeurer: ask(pi, exp(rational), etc.,
Q.algebraic) should return False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
Yeah. Adding those predicates should make some trivial ones work, like
ask(oo, Q.algebraic).
And we should add Q.transcendental which
Comment #25 on issue 2217 by asmeurer: Patches tutorial
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2217
That's a bug with the GitHub wiki. We are just using the ".. contents::
Table of Contents" reStructuredText directive.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: Polynomial
Comment #2 on issue 2357 by asmeurer: bugs in PythonRationalType
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2357
Another problem with PythonRationalType:
In [16]: S(PythonRationalType(2, 3))
Out[16]: 0.667
It should
Comment #5 on issue 2354 by asmeurer: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments
correctly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2354
I gues what I meant wasy, why don't the monomials support reverse orderings?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #16 on issue 1028 by skr...@gmail.com: Sum().doit() doesn't do it
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1028
OK, I will use the issue tracker then.
Oh, I assumed integration by parts was implemented .
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
Comment #12 on issue 1077 by christian.muise: ask(pi, exp(rational), etc.,
Q.algebraic) should return False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
This related to issue 2019?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To
Comment #11 on issue 1077 by christian.muise: ask(pi, exp(rational), etc.,
Q.algebraic) should return False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
This related to Issue 2019?
- http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2019
--
You received this message because you are sub
Comment #15 on issue 1028 by asmeurer: Sum().doit() doesn't do it
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1028
Feel free to edit the wiki however you like, though be aware that if you
want something to never be lost, the issue tracker is the best place to put
it.
By the way, what l
Comment #3 on issue 2355 by matt...@gmail.com: Should we .gitignore .patch
and .rej files?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2355
tags -> vim / ctags
dist -> setup.py dist
my -> ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" gr
Updates:
Summary: ask(pi, exp(rational), etc., Q.algebraic) should return False
Labels: Polynomial Assumptions
Comment #10 on issue 1077 by asmeurer: ask(pi, exp(rational), etc.,
Q.algebraic) should return False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1077
From the pul
Comment #2 on issue 2355 by asmeurer: Should we .gitignore .patch and .rej
files?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2355
To me, anything in .gitignore should be something that you wouldn't mind
deleting with ./setup.py clean or make clean (i.e., they can just be
regenerated)
Comment #24 on issue 2217 by tlora...@gmail.com: Patches tutorial
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2217
Links in the table of contents
(https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Development-workflow) don't work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: matt...@gmail.com
Cc: -matt...@gmail.com
Labels: mattpap
Comment #4 on issue 2354 by matt...@gmail.com: isympy -o doesn't parse bad
arguments correctly
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2354
Yes, it should be done b
Comment #1 on issue 2357 by matt...@gmail.com: bugs in PythonRationalType
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2357
Several bugs mentioned here are actually design decisions, e.g.:
print PythonRationalType(3)
3/1
PythonRationalType is meant for internal purpose of sympy.polys, not
Comment #4 on issue 2352 by smi...@gmail.com: Remove
Ellipse.distance_to_center()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2352
If someone is going to do more than a 1-off calculation they should really
have the formula and just do the subs, I suppose. I'm ok with removal.
--
You r
Comment #3 on issue 2352 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Remove
Ellipse.distance_to_center()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2352
But how can anybody understand that e.distance_to_center(1) means that,
unless they know what the translation is? That operation is so specialised
tha
Comment #2 on issue 2352 by smi...@gmail.com: Remove
Ellipse.distance_to_center()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2352
Here is a direct comparison:
h[4] >>> e
Ellipse(Point(1, 2), 3, 4)
>>> t = Symbol('t')
>>> Point.distance(e.center,e.arbitrary_point(t.name)
Comment #1 on issue 2358 by smi...@gmail.com: keep_sign should be cached
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2358
see also issue 2151
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-issues
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr
New issue 2358 by smi...@gmail.com: keep_sign should be cached
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2358
see http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/t/a9b5fa5d37795473
The change discussed th
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2357 by mario.pe...@gmail.com: bugs in PythonRationalType
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2357
Hi,
there are a few bugs in PythonRationalType
from sympy import *
from sympy.polys.domains.pythonrationaltype im
Comment #14 on issue 1028 by skr...@gmail.com: Sum().doit() doesn't do it
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1028
I already submitted some changes.
I think one alternative is the one you mention, to have some heuristics,
and is the most doable in th short term. Other alternative
49 matches
Mail list logo
