Re: Issue 2369 in sympy: __init__.py import order is not correct

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 2369 by tanglewish: __init__.py import order is not correct http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2369 it works fine in CPython, when i used it in PythonXY -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post

Re: Issue 821 in sympy: multiple arguments for max and other improvements

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #53 on issue 821 by asmeurer: multiple arguments for max and other improvements http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=821 Vinzent, why did you mark this as blocking on the release? Is it important, or can it be postponed? -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2369 in sympy: __init__.py import order is not correct

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer Comment #5 on issue 2369 by asmeurer: __init__.py import order is not correct http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2369 Why do you append python2.6 to your sys.path? I really don't know how to solve this. The ast_parser_python2.4 is

Re: Issue 2369 in sympy: __init__.py import order is not correct

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 2369 by asmeurer: __init__.py import order is not correct http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2369 See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/304. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this

Re: Issue 2369 in sympy: __init__.py import order is not correct

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #7 on issue 2369 by tanglewish: __init__.py import order is not correct http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2369 It doesn't matter whether testing in python27 or python26. Here is the log in python27: - IronPython 2.7 (2.7.0.40) on .NET 4.0.30319.225 Type help,

Re: Issue 2369 in sympy: __init__.py import order is not correct

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #8 on issue 2369 by asmeurer: __init__.py import order is not correct http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2369 But I mean why do you do it at all? Does IronPython not work if you don't do that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2369 in sympy: __init__.py import order is not correct

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #9 on issue 2369 by tanglewish: __init__.py import order is not correct http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2369 sympy is installed in the path of C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages, not in the path of C:\Program Files (x86)\IronPython 2.7\Lib\site-packages. So appending

Re: Issue 2369 in sympy: __init__.py import order is not correct

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #10 on issue 2369 by tanglewish: __init__.py import order is not correct http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2369 IronPython 2.7 (2.7.0.40) on .NET 4.0.30319.225 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import sys sys.path ['.',

Re: Issue 2353 in sympy: Warnings printed in the geometry tests

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2353 by pr...@goodok.ru: Warnings printed in the geometry tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2353 Why don't to define special function e.g. warning_raises like the existing `raises` function (which is defined in sympy/utilities/pytest.py) ? It will

Re: Issue 2353 in sympy: Warnings printed in the geometry tests

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 2353 by ness...@googlemail.com: Warnings printed in the geometry tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2353 This was merged: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/commit/fd4e251e3f5aded527b10d64f404f9cac4475db7 -- You received

Re: Issue 2205 in sympy: Undefined functions

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #17 on issue 2205 by ness...@googlemail.com: Undefined functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2205 This was merged: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/commit/34e99f4588b788aa1db4155fcd672d56fef0426b -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 2325 in sympy: w32 geometry test error

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2325 by smi...@gmail.com: w32 geometry test error http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2325 Thanks, it's in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this group,

Re: Issue 2368 in sympy: AttributeError: 'Tuple' object has no attribute 'as_coeff_add' with .replace(Wild expression, Wild expression)

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 2368 by smi...@gmail.com: AttributeError: 'Tuple' object has no attribute 'as_coeff_add' with .replace(Wild expression, Wild expression) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2368 So Integral needs its own replace method just like it has its own subs

Re: Issue 2205 in sympy: Name for Undefined functions

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Summary: Name for Undefined functions Status: NeedsDecision Comment #18 on issue 2205 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Name for Undefined functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2205 We still need to find a good name for these objects. -- You received this

Re: Issue 1847 in sympy: Powsimp returns wrong result

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #18 on issue 1847 by smi...@gmail.com: Powsimp returns wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1847 Øyvind, are you still around? I put a pull request for this issue using your patch. I modified it to also allow for the exponent being an integer and added a test

Re: Issue 1119 in sympy: Implement global equations solver in sympy:

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #5 on issue 1119 by smi...@gmail.com: Implement global equations solver in sympy: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1119 See http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyinterval for the implementation discussed in the paper cited. I don't know if that's what was being cited in

Re: Issue 821 in sympy: multiple arguments for max and other improvements

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.0 Milestone-Release0.7.1 Comment #54 on issue 821 by Vinzent.Steinberg: multiple arguments for max and other improvements http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=821 It can be postboned (medium priority means it is no show stopper in my

Re: Issue 2327 in sympy: sqrt(I) should return sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2*I by default

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #4 on issue 2327 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(I) should return sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2*I by default http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2327 I could see trying to automatically remove the complex number from the denominator as we do with radicals so 1/(1+I) goes to 1/2 - I/2

Re: Issue 1766 in sympy: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch Comment #69 on issue 1766 by smi...@gmail.com: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/306 All tests pass when I use the force=True option in risch (which I

Re: Issue 2205 in sympy: Name for Undefined functions

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #19 on issue 2205 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Name for Undefined functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2205 I like AbstractFunction. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Issue 1847 in sympy: Powsimp returns wrong result

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #19 on issue 1847 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Powsimp returns wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1847 Did you try it with '--amend' instead of '--ammend'? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to

Re: Issue 1847 in sympy: Powsimp returns wrong result

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #20 on issue 1847 by smi...@gmail.com: Powsimp returns wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1847 that works :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Issue 2087 in sympy: solver treats a nonlinear expression as linear and mis-solves a true nonlinear system; fixed in polys11 but slow

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2087 by smi...@gmail.com: solver treats a nonlinear expression as linear and mis-solves a true nonlinear system; fixed in polys11 but slow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2087 see issue 2362 -- You received this message

Re: Issue 2362 in sympy: subs or N has an issue with quartic root

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2362 by smi...@gmail.com: subs or N has an issue with quartic root http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2362 this error was documented in issue 2087, too -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post

Issue 2370 in sympy: Create a warning_raises() function for testing warnings

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Testing New issue 2370 by asmeurer: Create a warning_raises() function for testing warnings http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2370 See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2353#c3. -- You received

Re: Issue 2353 in sympy: Warnings printed in the geometry tests

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #5 on issue 2353 by asmeurer: Warnings printed in the geometry tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2353 I made a new issue for warning_raises. See issue 2370. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to

Re: Issue 2327 in sympy: sqrt(I) should return sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2*I by default

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: NeedsDecision Comment #5 on issue 2327 by asmeurer: sqrt(I) should return sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2*I by default http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2327 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2362 in sympy: subs or N has an issue with quartic root

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #4 on issue 2362 by smi...@gmail.com: subs or N has an issue with quartic root http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2362 If the answer is expanded with complex=True, zero is also obtained after substitution: eq.subs(u,ans[3]).n() .0e-90 + 8.02995128223089*I

Re: Issue 357 in sympy: trigonometric rewriting

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #7 on issue 357 by jrez...@gmail.com: trigonometric rewriting http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=357 Guys, it very good and useful feature, please implement it. Fox example Maple has function 'combine', which try to decrease power of trigonometric expressions, it used

Re: Issue 1119 in sympy: Implement global equations solver in sympy:

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 1119 by smi...@gmail.com: Implement global equations solver in sympy: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1119 Vinzent, what is it about the solver you like? Finding roots in a range without a good guess? -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2205 in sympy: Name for Undefined functions

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #20 on issue 2205 by asmeurer: Name for Undefined functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2205 I don't mind UndefinedFunction. How about FunctionSymbol, since they are kind of the function analogues of Symbols? -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 1847 in sympy: Powsimp returns wrong result

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #21 on issue 1847 by asmeurer: Powsimp returns wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1847 I've done that before. That's why I always use tab completion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to

Re: Issue 2369 in sympy: __init__.py import order is not correct

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #11 on issue 2369 by asmeurer: __init__.py import order is not correct http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2369 That issue was also mentioned in issue 60. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this

Re: Issue 2347 in sympy: Basic sums not solved

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2347 by asmeurer: Basic sums not solved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2347 Instead of commenting out failing tests, can you put them under tests with the XFAIL decorator? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2347 in sympy: Basic sums not solved

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #4 on issue 2347 by asmeurer: Basic sums not solved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2347 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2347 in sympy: Basic sums not solved

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Comment #5 on issue 2347 by skr...@gmail.com: Basic sums not solved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2347 Ok, no problem, thanks for the tip. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Issue 2371 in sympy: Completely untested modules in sympy.polys

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: matt...@gmail.com Comment #1 on issue 2371 by asmeurer: Completely untested modules in sympy.polys http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2371 I think at least some of this (like the sparse stuff) is WIP code that isn't finished yet. -- You received this

Re: Issue 2371 in sympy: Completely untested modules in sympy.polys

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: Polynomial Comment #2 on issue 2371 by asmeurer: Completely untested modules in sympy.polys http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2371 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1769 in sympy: cos(oo) should return nan

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 1769 by sapta.ii...@gmail.com: cos(oo) should return nan http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1769 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/308 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1769 in sympy: cos(oo) should return nan

2011-05-13 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: sapta.iitkgp Comment #2 on issue 1769 by asmeurer: cos(oo) should return nan http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1769 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group.