Status: Accepted
Owner: skr...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2407 by skr...@gmail.com: Rsolve introduces unknown symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2407
These commands were executed:
from __future__ import division
from sympy import *
x, y, z, t =
Comment #1 on issue 2407 by skr...@gmail.com: Rsolve introduces unknown
symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2407
Discard this issue, I made a mistake.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group,
Status: Accepted
Owner: skr...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2408 by skr...@gmail.com: Error in rsolve
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2408
These commands were executed:
from __future__ import division
from sympy import *
x, y, z, t = symbols('x y z
Comment #1 on issue 2408 by skr...@gmail.com: Error in rsolve
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2408
Sorry, the last 2 lines should read:
The expected answer is f(0)*2**(n-1)*n
f(n) = (2*n/(n-1))*f(n-1) =
Comment #26 on issue 1491 by matt...@gmail.com: Use nice ordering in
printing
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1491
I fixed bugs related to non-commutative symbols in ordering functions and
improved ordering of certain classes of expressions when fixing doctests.
Fixed all
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-High Priority-Critical NeedsReview
Comment #27 on issue 1491 by matt...@gmail.com: Use nice ordering in
printing
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1491
Pull request is here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/344
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 1271 by smi...@gmail.com: Implement rsolve
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1271
This no longer appears in the codebase.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post
Updates:
Summary: examples/advanced/relativity.py stopped working (issue identified
at comment 11)
Comment #13 on issue 2180 by smi...@gmail.com:
examples/advanced/relativity.py stopped working (issue identified at
comment 11)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2180
(No
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2409 by smi...@gmail.com: variable undefined
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2409
The following error popped up while testing:
File C:\Documents and
Updates:
Status: NeedsDecision
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #1 on issue 2406 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: improve Tuple constructor
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2406
We should try to resolve this before the release, because it would be too
much of a
Comment #2 on issue 2406 by renato.c...@gmail.com: improve Tuple constructor
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2406
I see. In fact, there's no way this would work like builtin tuple because
tuple() only accepts a single argument. I'm +1 on your suggestion.
--
You received this
Comment #23 on issue 1827 by asmeurer: log eval gives more standard form
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1827
Now you've got me wondering just how lucky it was. Given a number n,
what's the probability that the second largest factor is greater than or
equal to k (if I
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #2 on issue 2407 by asmeurer: Rsolve introduces unknown symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2407
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Labels: Solvers Polynomial
Comment #2 on issue 2408 by asmeurer: Error in rsolve
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2408
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Comment #1 on issue 2409 by asmeurer: variable undefined
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2409
How do you reproduce this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to
Comment #3 on issue 2406 by renato.c...@gmail.com: improve Tuple constructor
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2406
I implemented the sympification of the args in
https://github.com/renatocoutinho/sympy/commit/a7db82ff88baab2b21768d5cfa652eb69b998702
I had to do it in
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: matt...@gmail.com
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #2 on issue 2409 by matt...@gmail.com: variable undefined
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2409
In [3]: groebner([x**2 + 2.0*y], x, y)
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #4 on issue 2406 by asmeurer: improve Tuple constructor
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2406
Not only that, but there would be an inconsistency for nested Tuples:
Tuple((1, 2, 3)) (i.e., Tuple(tuple([1, 2, 3])))
Tuple(1, 2, 3)
Comment #5 on issue 2406 by renato.c...@gmail.com: improve Tuple constructor
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2406
Another point I just noticed is that sympify(tuple()) - tuple(), not a
Tuple. So this is happening (in my branch):
Tuple((1, x), 3).subs(x, 0)
...
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #16 on issue 2265 by andy.ter...@gmail.com: cse requires
subexpressions to be in the exact same order
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2265
Sorry for not getting back to you. Thanks for pushing this in!
--
You received this message
Status: Accepted
Owner: skr...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 2412 by skr...@gmail.com: Sketch of Sister Celine's algorithm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2412
Based on the algorithm explained in the book A=B (Chapter 4)
21 matches
Mail list logo