Comment #8 on issue 1435 by renato.c...@gmail.com: f(x, y).diff(x, y) -
f(x, y).diff(y, x) should simplify to zero
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1435
Although the fix above is satisfactory for me, I thought that sorting args
could confuse people. In master `f(x,
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: matt...@gmail.com
Labels: NeedsReview Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #2 on issue 2441 by matt...@gmail.com: sympify() should recognize
and convert mpmath types
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2441
Pull request is here:
Status: Accepted
Owner: vlada.pe...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2472 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
This is what I get in current master when
Comment #1 on issue 2472 by matt...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
I tested all supported Python versions on 32/64-bit and got no test
failures. Can you run the following code:
In [1]: var('r')
Out[1]: r
Comment #2 on issue 2472 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
Nope, i=0 on py26, works on 27 (didn't test more).
Are you testing with gmpy or without? I'm without.
--
You received this message
Comment #9 on issue 1435 by asmeurer: f(x, y).diff(x, y) - f(x, y).diff(y,
x) should simplify to zero
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1435
Hmm. I'm not sure what the best way would be. By the way, another option
would be to have it as it is now but make it so
Comment #3 on issue 2472 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
And yes, I just tested - it works with gmpy.
Cool error, huh? I suppose that it at least shows the value of tox.
--
You received this
Comment #4 on issue 2472 by matt...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
I tested both with and without gmpy. All work properly. I even run tests on
2.6/64 100x in a loop and there was no failure. Does this
Comment #5 on issue 2472 by matt...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
Can you run those tests with/without cache?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Comment #6 on issue 2472 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
Every time so far; I tried it without cache and it still doesn't work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #7 on issue 2472 by matt...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
Do you have to run whole test suit to trigger the failure or is it
sufficient to run test_rootoftools.py?
--
You received this message
Comment #8 on issue 2472 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
It's enough to run the test file. I'm also running it with your code, and
it gives me 0 every time.
--
You received this message
Comment #9 on issue 2472 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
Well then, this is what I get:
a = RootSum((x - 7)*f**3, g)
b = log(7*x) + 3*RootSum(f, g)
a.args
⎛ ⎛ 3
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-High Testing
New issue 2473 by asmeurer: Print whether the tests are running in 32-bit
or 64-bit
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2473
This should be printed right before the ground types when testing. You
Comment #1 on issue 2473 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Print whether the tests
are running in 32-bit or 64-bit
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2473
Another way to do this is:
import platform
platform.architecture()
('64bit', 'ELF')
This also tells which SO you are using.
--
Comment #2 on issue 2473 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Print whether the tests
are running in 32-bit or 64-bit
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2473
Actually, I just realized what I said is wrong. If you run python 32-bits
in a 64-bits environment, platform.architecture is going
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2474 by krastano...@gmail.com: bug in current pyglet
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2474
Described in Ubuntu LaunchPad
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyglet/+bug/786516
The new version of
Comment #1 on issue 2474 by krastano...@gmail.com: bug in current pyglet
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2474
Fixing issue 2144 (making pyglet external dependency) is also a solution.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Comment #10 on issue 2472 by asmeurer: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
On IRC, we got down to
In [1]: var('r')
Out[1]: r
In [2]: f = x**3 + x + 3
In [3]: g = Lambda(r, log(r*x))
In [4]: a = RootSum((x - 7)*f**3, g)
Comment #11 on issue 2472 by asmeurer: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
See my DMP__hash__ branch, where I've done that. If this works for
everyone, I will clean it up (i.e., add comments explaining why we do that
Comment #12 on issue 2472 by asmeurer: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
I think that fix is no good, because L can appear in the rep with
symbolic coefficients (like EX(Symbol(L))).
--
You received this message
Updates:
Labels: Polynomial
Comment #13 on issue 2472 by asmeurer: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
So I think the best way woud be to create a dmp_to_tuple function in
densebasic.py and a corresponding method
Comment #14 on issue 2472 by asmeurer: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
An easy way to do this would be to take the string of the rep and parse it
to replace the [ with ( and ] with ). You would also need to parse it
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2403 by smi...@gmail.com: simplify could accept more
symbol containers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2403
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 2420 by asmeurer: Refactor EPath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2420
See the rather extensive discussion at the two above pull requests. To
summarize: we are going to leave things the way they are in master. A
patch has
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview -Milestone-Release0.7.0 NeedsBetterPatch
Milestone-Release0.7.1 mattpap
Comment #3 on issue 2441 by asmeurer: sympify() should recognize and
convert mpmath types
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2441
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #15 on issue 2472 by asmeurer: Regression in
sympy/polys/tests/test_rootoftools.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2472
OK, I fixed it. See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/405. I
Issue 2144: Make Pyglet plotting an external dependency
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2144
This issue is now blocking issue 2474.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2474
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Updates:
Labels: Plotting
Blockedon: 2144
Comment #2 on issue 2474 by asmeurer: bug in current pyglet
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2474
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Issue 2196: Document assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2196
This issue is now blocking issue 2165.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2165
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Updates:
Blockedon: 2196
Comment #7 on issue 2165 by asmeurer: Pow.is_bounded could handle more cases
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2165
Regarding documentation, see issue 2196.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #73 on issue 1766 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars should use
expand [was: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive]
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
changes related to comment #72 have been fixed. There are so many issues
here
Comment #3 on issue 2077 by smi...@gmail.com: classify_ode() doesn't catch
a 1st_linear/separable ode
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2077
this works in master, now. Did you want to write a test for this or just
close it, Aaron?
--
You received this message because you
Comment #2 on issue 1782 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars(((1 + 2*x +
x**2)*exp(y**2))/(x*y + y), [x, y], dict=True) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1782
This works now, but a test for this was not added:
separatevars(((1 + 2*x + x**2)*exp(y**2))/(x*y +
Comment #4 on issue 2077 by asmeurer: classify_ode() doesn't catch a
1st_linear/separable ode
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2077
Let's write a test for it. Having all the classifiers in classify_ode()
work correctly is a tricky thing, and it's good to have it well
Comment #3 on issue 1782 by asmeurer: separatevars(((1 + 2*x +
x**2)*exp(y**2))/(x*y + y), [x, y], dict=True) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1782
Let's test it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Comment #1 on issue 2475 by asmeurer: primitive should use Add, not
_new_rawargs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2475
Pull 322 may make this irrelevant, but we should still document this gotcha
in the _new_rawargs docstring, and also it might be a good idea to double
Updates:
Labels: Documentation
Comment #2 on issue 2475 by asmeurer: primitive should use Add, not
_new_rawargs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2475
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
38 matches
Mail list logo
