Issue 2693 in sympy: Comparable issue in sympy/core/numbers.py

2011-09-19 Thread sympy
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2693 by hjansen...@gmail.com: Comparable issue in sympy/core/numbers.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2693 The Python Multibody (Dynamics) software PyMbs uses Sympy for symbolic preprocessing of equation

Issue 2694 in sympy: Pretty print of -I*oo

2011-09-19 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: someb...@bluewin.ch Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Printing New issue 2694 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Pretty print of -I*oo http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2694 The pretty printing of -I*oo is seriously broken: In [27]: -I*oo Out[27]: -oo*I In [28]: ppri

Re: Issue 2693 in sympy: Comparable issue in sympy/core/numbers.py

2011-09-19 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: Matrices Comment #1 on issue 2693 by asmeurer: Comparable issue in sympy/core/numbers.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2693 Do you think you could give a short bit of code the reproduces this? Also, am I correct that this is in Rational.__eq__? --

Re: Issue 447 in sympy: Better unicode square root

2011-09-19 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #23 on issue 447 by asmeurer: Better unicode square root http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=447 This was pushed in. I think there's nothing left to do here. If you use the right font and terminal, the unicode printing for standard math (p

Re: Issue 2681 in sympy: Don't pretty print atan2 as atanâ‚‚

2011-09-19 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Started Comment #1 on issue 2681 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Don't pretty print atan2 as atanâ‚‚ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2681 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sy

Re: Issue 2654 in sympy: lambdify() does not convert abs()

2011-09-19 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Started Comment #4 on issue 2654 by someb...@bluewin.ch: lambdify() does not convert abs() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2654 The built-in abs(.) is not an ufunc. It works in principle/most of the time. (I don't know if it really works always. And

Re: Issue 2643 in sympy: Create a root() function

2011-09-19 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Started Comment #2 on issue 2643 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Create a root() function http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2643 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues"