Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #20 on issue 2712 by ness...@gmail.com: Merge gsoc-2 and gsoc-3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2712
Merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #12 on issue 459 by ness...@gmail.com: simple double integration
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=459
gsoc-3 was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #19 on issue 841 by ness...@gmail.com:
integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x), (x, -oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the
integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
gsoc-3 was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #18 on issue 1304 by ness...@gmail.com: Integrate sqrt(x**2 + y**2)
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1304
gsoc-3 was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 1388 by ness...@gmail.com: integrate(exp(-x)*x**n, x)
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1388
gsoc-3 was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 1394 by ness...@gmail.com: integrate(x*sqrt(1+2*x), x)
can't do it yet
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1394
gsoc-3 was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 1638 by ness...@gmail.com: integrate (sin(x)/x, (x,
-oo, oo)) returns Integral (fails)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1638
gsoc-3 was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 2903
Comment #1 on issue 2904 by ness...@gmail.com: Better documentation for
g-function formulae
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2904
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #1 on issue 2903 by ness...@gmail.com: Better documentation for
g-function formulae
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2903
Issue 2904 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High
Comment #32 on issue 2307 by asmeu...@gmail.com: as_coeff_mul()[0] !=
as_coeff_Mul()[0] when the coeff is Number (not Rational)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Comment #6 on issue 2964 by asmeu...@gmail.com: S.One.is_prime gives True
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2964
Well, I disagree. is_prime is very explicit, and I don't see any reason
why it shouldn't call isprime(). To me, if the assumptions system can
return True or False
Comment #7 on issue 2964 by asmeu...@gmail.com: S.One.is_prime gives True
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2964
Also, isprime() doesn't really seem that expensive to me (unlike
factorint()).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #15 on issue 1893 by ness...@gmail.com: integrate(log(x) * x**(k-1)
* exp(-x) / gamma(k), (x, 0, oo)) hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1893
A test for this was commited to master.
--
You received this message because you are
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2988 by smi...@gmail.com: invalid expansion of Mul bases in Pow
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2988
There is still a problem with invalid expansion of bases lurking in the
core:
(-2*x*y**y)**3.2
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr
New issue 2989 by smi...@gmail.com: Segment is not correctly ordering args
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2989
Segment((0,1),(0,2))
Segment(Point(0, 2), Point(0, 1))
The Point(0, 1) should be
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #4 on issue 2061 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(-1.0*x) gives infinite
recursion
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2061
The result above is not correct: if x == -1, sqrt(-1.*x) should give 1.0.
Instead, expanding the result as
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2990 by smi...@gmail.com: Float is not pulled out of Mul base
when exponent is Integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2990
(2*B*C)**3
8*(B*C)**3
(2.*B*C)**3
(2.0*B*C)**3
The second expression
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2991 by smi...@gmail.com: commutative factors are not pulled out
of a Mul base
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2991
(-2*x*y*A*B)**2
4*(x*y*A*B)**2
(-2*x*y)**2
4*x**2*y**2
The first expression
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: -NeedsReview -smichr
Comment #4 on issue 2981 by krastano...@gmail.com: document the check
option of solve()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2981
It was a typo but a typo in the other direction (I think). sin(x)/x is
equal
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Solvers
New issue 2992 by krastano...@gmail.com: in solve: check=False produces
wrong answers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2992
I may have misunderstood the idea behind check=False. In this case just
mark
Updates:
Status: NeedsDecision
Comment #5 on issue 2981 by krastano...@gmail.com: document the check
option of solve()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2981
Maybe I have misunderstood the idea behind check=False. In this case issue
2992 should be marked as WontFix.
Comment #6 on issue 2981 by smi...@gmail.com: document the check option
of solve()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2981
I'm busy at the moment but will try to update this and make a pull request
when it is ready.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Comment #7 on issue 2981 by krastano...@gmail.com: document the check
option of solve()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2981
Thanks! I can add it myself if you agree that it makes sense / is correct /
etc.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #19 on issue 2872 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Issues with the SymPy Live
mobile interface
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2872
Actually, they weren't. But they are fixed now:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy-live/pull/47.
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #4 on issue 2865 by krastano...@gmail.com: str(Matrix(...)) should
give Matrix(...)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2865
There was some work done for this here:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/819
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #14 on issue 2597 by krastano...@gmail.com: Import all public
functions and classes into Sphinx
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2597
It seems like it's fixed. All Code-in tasks are closed.
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 2528 by krastano...@gmail.com: Update SymPy's Wikipedia
article
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2528
The task in Code-in is closed. Marking as fixed...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #10 on issue 2770 by krastano...@gmail.com: Update stuff that SymPy
can do on the homepage
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2770
It was done in GCI. Marking as fixed...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #8 on issue 2800 by krastano...@gmail.com: Flesh out the SymPy
Papers wiki page
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2800
Done for Code-in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 2795 by krastano...@gmail.com: Investigate a robust way
to have translated documentation
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2795
I think this is already done. Marking as fixed...
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 2771 by krastano...@gmail.com: Write a document showing
the difference between SymPy and other mathematical systems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2771
All task in Code-in are closed. Marking as fixed.
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 2806 by krastano...@gmail.com: Add more tips to the
tips page
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2806
All task in Code-in are closed. Marking as fixed...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #11 on issue 1817 by krastano...@gmail.com: SymPy Cheat Sheet
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1817
This was nicely done during Code-in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Comment #6 on issue 2845 by krastano...@gmail.com: Integrating the new
plotting module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2845
Also the cheat sheet, comparisons with other CASs, wiki page and so on
should get new screenshots...
--
You received this message because you are
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Solvers
New issue 2993 by krastano...@gmail.com: nsolve does not return sympy
objects
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2993
The matrices that are returned are sympy.mpmath.matrices.matrices.matrix.
Number are
Comment #1 on issue 2993 by krastano...@gmail.com: nsolve does not return
sympy objects
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2993
It's not float it's sympy.mpmath.ctx_mp_python.mpf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2994 by krastano...@gmail.com: evalf() does not play well with
sympy.mpmath.matrices.matrices.matrix
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2994
In [14]: r2.evalf(subs={y : 1.2})
Out[14]: root2(y) # not as
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Physics
New issue 2995 by smi...@gmail.com: skipped secondquant doctest passes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2995
The doctest of has_q_annihilators has passed for some time...I wonder if it
was just copied and
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2996 by smi...@gmail.com: collect doesn't collect power with
numerical base
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2996
collect(a*y**(2*x)+b*y**(2*x),y**(x))
(a + b)*(y**2)**x
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2997 by smi...@gmail.com: collect mishandles power rules
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2997
collect(a*y**(2*x)+b*y**(2*x),y**(x))
(a + b)*(y**2)**x
y**(2*x) is not always the same as (y**2)**x:
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Simplify
New issue 2998 by smi...@gmail.com: collect doesn't process powers with
float coeff in exponent
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2998
collect(a*y**(2.*x)+b*y**(2.*x),y**(x))
a*y**(2.0*x) + b*y**(2.0*x)
Updates:
Labels: Simplify
Comment #1 on issue 2997 by smi...@gmail.com: collect mishandles power rules
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2997
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2999 by smi...@gmail.com: expand(trig=True) could process Floats
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2999
The following is unchanged
sin(2.*x).expand(trig=True)
sin(2.0*x)
while the Integer variant is
43 matches
Mail list logo
