Comment #10 on issue 3691 by khageshp...@gmail.com: Add determinant to
matrix expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3691
I have send a pull request for this.Now should I concentrate on determinant
simplification provided in section 1.1 matrix cookbook.
--
You receive
Comment #11 on issue 3691 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Add determinant to matrix
expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3691
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1911
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this addre
Comment #5 on issue 3710 by smi...@gmail.com: shallow expansion feature/bug
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3710
There is epath, too.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notificat
Comment #1 on issue 3357 by ivan.sa...@gmail.com: Functions clear variables
in SymPy Live
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3357
I guess ''def'' doesn't work as expected...
Is this something specific to app engine?
--
You received this message because this project is configure
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3711 by gra...@gmail.com: probability() should handle union
and intersection of conditions as well as point conditions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3711
Currently,
from sympy.stats import Die, P,
Comment #6 on issue 3710 by smi...@gmail.com: shallow expansion feature/bug
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3710
There is only function 'use' in the simplify.simplify.traversaltools.py
file. And this is how it can be used to give the shallow processing of an
expression:
e
Comment #7 on issue 3710 by asmeu...@gmail.com: shallow expansion
feature/bug
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3710
What's the motivation for this specific level of expansion?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to
Comment #2 on issue 3330 by papiredd...@gmail.com: Taylor expansion wrong
for this expression?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3330
why does f.taylor_term(0,x) returns 1 where
def taylor_term(cls, n, x, *previous_terms):
"""General method for the taylor term.
Comment #4 on issue 3221 by khageshp...@gmail.com: Matrix.charpoly() should
include minus sign for odd order matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3221
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1919
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
is
Comment #1 on issue 3711 by julien.r...@gmail.com: probability() should
handle union and intersection of conditions as well as point conditions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3711
You are using the wrong syntax to represent the (in)equalities:
1) `X = 2` used in the call to
Comment #5 on issue 3221 by matt...@gmail.com: Matrix.charpoly() should
include minus sign for odd order matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3221
Doesn't the sign depend on the definition of characteristic polynomial? To
me the result is correct assuming `charpoly(M) =
Comment #6 on issue 3221 by khageshp...@gmail.com: Matrix.charpoly() should
include minus sign for odd order matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3221
Yes det(t*I-M) will always give monic polynomial but which definition is
used by sympy.Some authors support det(M-t*I) o
Comment #7 on issue 3221 by matt...@gmail.com: Matrix.charpoly() should
include minus sign for odd order matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3221
In berkowitz() and related methods we use det(t*I - M) (see the docstring)
(charpoly() is an alias to berkowitz_charpoly()).
Comment #2 on issue 3357 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Functions clear variables
in SymPy Live
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3357
It likely has to do with the way we store things between sessions using
pickling.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
Comment #3 on issue 3380 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove deprecated
Integral.transform(inverse=True)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3380
No, it was just barely deprecated.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this
Updates:
Labels: Plotting
Comment #1 on issue 3705 by asmeu...@gmail.com: set_zlim
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3705
What version of matplotlib do you have?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this addre
Comment #8 on issue 3221 by khageshp...@gmail.com: Matrix.charpoly() should
include minus sign for odd order matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3221
Then you should close this issue and there is also no point of this patch.
--
You received this message because this proj
Comment #9 on issue 3221 by khageshp...@gmail.com: Matrix.charpoly() should
include minus sign for odd order matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3221
Then you can close this issue and there is also no point of this patch.
--
You received this message because this project
Updates:
Status: Valid
Comment #2 on issue 3705 by matt...@gmail.com: set_zlim
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3705
I'm getting this too. I'm using version 1.0.1.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this ad
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #10 on issue 3221 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Matrix.charpoly() should
include minus sign for odd order matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3221
I didn't realize that it was defined the other way. According to
http://en.wikipedia.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
