Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: mattpap
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High
New issue 1276 by ondrej.certik: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
In [1]: solve(-1 + x**2 + 0.111*(
Updates:
Owner: fabian.seoane
Comment #1 on issue 1276 by fabian.seoane: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
It can be traced down to this:
In [1]: poly_factors(2.0*x, x)
-
Updates:
Owner: ---
Cc: -mattpap
Comment #2 on issue 1276 by fabian.seoane: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
I'm concentrating on series now, so leaving this unassigned i
Updates:
Labels: EasyToFix
Comment #3 on issue 1276 by fabian.seoane: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#float.as_integer_ratio
could b
Comment #4 on issue 1276 by fab...@fseoane.net: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
function nsimplify could be used to transform float's into fractions.
--
You received this message becau
Comment #5 on issue 1276 by smichr: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
In 1766 it works like this:
solve(-1 + x**2 + 0.111*(1.00 +
2.00*x)**2,x)
[-
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0 Polynomial Solvers
Comment #6 on issue 1276 by mattpap: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
A little update on this issue (polys11):
In [1]
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #7 on issue 1276 by Vinzent.Steinberg: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Comment #8 on issue 1276 by smichr: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
Do you think solve should make reals rational by default or should that be
left to the user?
Perhaps a "behind t
Updates:
Cc: mattpap
Comment #9 on issue 1276 by asmeurer: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
So is this issue completely fixed in the new polys, Mateusz?
--
You received this me
Comment #10 on issue 1276 by mattpap: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
Yes, this was fixed completely.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sy
Updates:
Blockedon: 2133
Comment #11 on issue 1276 by asmeurer: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #12 on issue 1276 by smi...@gmail.com: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message be
13 matches
Mail list logo