Updates:
Summary: Code Quality (was crlf)
Cc: asmeurer ondrej.certik
Comment #1 on issue 1702 by smichr: Code Quality (was crlf)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1702
There are a few things that I would like to see in the testing process to
verify a patch:
1) a c
Comment #2 on issue 1702 by smichr: Code Quality (was crlf)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1702
Issue 1714's check on indentation would be good, too. (But I wouldn't want
to see it
enforced on continuation lines which are sometimes conveniently indented to
show the
structure
Comment #3 on issue 1702 by asmeurer: Code Quality (was crlf)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1702
Maybe if there were a more streamlined way to check the coverage, like we
have for the docstrings coverage. I am +1
for coverage day. Maybe we should do it over the summer like w
