Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-05-31 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer CC: mattpap Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview New issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 As the first part of my Google Summer of Code project, I undertook to write doctests for

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2012-09-13 Thread sympy
Issue 1949: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2010. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2010 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or b

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2012-09-13 Thread sympy
Issue 1949: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2010. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2010 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or b

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2012-09-27 Thread sympy
Issue 1949: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:294. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=294 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or bec

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2012-09-27 Thread sympy
Issue 1949: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This issue is now blocking issue sympy:294. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=294 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or bec

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-06-14 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 1949 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 Did you actually review polys9, Aaron? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-06-14 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 No, polys9 is not ready to go in (test failures for one). This will have to wait at least until that. My main reason for putting this up was so Mateusz look it over an

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-07-15 Thread sympy
Issue 1949: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This issue is now blocking issue 294. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=294 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because y

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-07-15 Thread sympy
Issue 1949: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This issue is now blocking issue 1587. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1587 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-07-22 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: Polynomial Documentation Comment #3 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 So I noticed that polys11 contains changes that are going to be a major headache in merging this branch over it. Namely,

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-07-24 Thread sympy
Comment #4 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 I noticed that you are starting to integrate it. Thanks a lot! I tried merging polys11 into my branch to see if it would work, but even after a lot of work I was forced

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-07-24 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Started Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0 Comment #5 on issue 1949 by mattpap: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This is what I do, I'm cherry-picking your commits, fixing what's wrong and commiting with your data

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-07-25 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 Yeah. I noticed that you created a string printer for gmpy (which was the only reason I did that). I guess I just took the lazy way out in what I did, and I am +1 on y

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-08-06 Thread sympy
Comment #7 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 Just a warning. You can't use Header == in any docstring that gets imported by Sphinx, because it causes the build to fail (do cd doc; make html). This is basicall

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-08-15 Thread sympy
Comment #8 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 A question on your changes. Why have you replaced all the hyphens (-) with en dashes (--)? I think this is grammatically incorrect for most of the cases where it has b

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-08-15 Thread sympy
Comment #9 on issue 1949 by mattpap: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 #7: As I recall, Sphinx uses relative sections, so if we use in docstrings then we have to modify rst files in which particular docstrings are imported, e.g. use dou

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-08-16 Thread sympy
Issue 1949: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This issue is now blocking issue 2010. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2010 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-09-01 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: asmeurer mattpap Comment #10 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 Well, if you can figure out how to make work, that would be super, because that looks much better in the source code imho.

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-12-29 Thread sympy
Comment #11 on issue 1949 by mattpap: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This issue is not related strictly to ground types, but a bit was said about this here, so lets summarize recent changes in polys11 related to ground types. Previously

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-12-29 Thread sympy
Comment #12 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 Nice. I think this will simplify things, not having to worry about Fraction or sympy ground types. How were you able to make PythonFraction faster than Fraction? I t

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2010-12-29 Thread sympy
Comment #13 on issue 1949 by mattpap: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 How were you able to make PythonFraction faster than Fraction? Fraction is implemented in pure Python using ABCs and is very, very generic, so it's not that hard to wri

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2011-01-04 Thread sympy
Comment #14 on issue 1949 by asmeurer: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 Concerning comments 7, 9, and 10, I tried building the docs in polys12 using Sphinx 1.0.5, and perhaps it is a new feature, but I the docs still built despite all the "

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2011-01-04 Thread sympy
Comment #15 on issue 1949 by mattpap: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 I didn't work on documentation yet, so let me look into this tomorrow. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group.

Re: Issue 1949 in sympy: Doctests for polynomials module

2011-04-29 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #16 on issue 1949 by matt...@gmail.com: Doctests for polynomials module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1949 This was fixed at some point. Now grepping for '*' in sympy/polys doesn't give an