Updates:
Labels: -Priority-High -Milestone-Release0.7.3 Priority-Medium
Comment #28 on issue 2626 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
I guess it's not going to change. Piecewise represents
Updates:
Labels: -CodeInCategory-Code -CodeInDifficulty-Hard
-CodeInImportedIntoGoogleDocs
Comment #27 on issue 2626 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
Removing this from Code-In as it's still
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.2 Milestone-Release0.7.3
Comment #24 on issue 2626 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
Unfortunately, discussion on this was stalled, so we'll have to
Issue 2626: Piecewise should use a different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2710.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Issue 2626: Piecewise should use a different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2710.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Comment #21 on issue 2626 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
Irregardless of the user syntax for the otherwise_expr, it would be nice to
convert to (otherwise_expr, True) internally, as then
Comment #22 on issue 2626 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
Doing that would require supporting the old syntax indefinitely, which is
something that I want to drop.
--
You received this
Comment #20 on issue 2626 by sean.v@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1009
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #16 on issue 2626 by jamespis...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
SCRIPTalert(XSS)/SCRIPT
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to
Comment #17 on issue 2626 by jamespis...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
IMG SRC=javascript:alert(String.fromCharCode(88,83,83))
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #18 on issue 2626 by jamespis...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
IMG SRC=jav ascript:alert('XSS');
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Comment #19 on issue 2626 by jamespis...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
IMG SRC=jav#x0D;ascript:alert('XSS');
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Cc: ondrej.c...@gmail.com
Comment #15 on issue 2626 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
I don't think that it makes sense for Piecewise to hold tuples, and as
such, I vote for
Comment #13 on issue 2626 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
So here's one of the issues that would be nice to have fixed (or at least
begun) by the release, so that we can start the deprecation
Updates:
Labels: CodeInCategory-Code CodeInDifficulty-Hard
Comment #10 on issue 2626 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #7 on issue 2626 by asmeurer: Piecewise should use a different
syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
I've started to fix this in my piecewise-syntax branch. I'll submit it as
a pull request when it's all ready.
Updates:
Cc: ness...@googlemail.com
Comment #8 on issue 2626 by asmeurer: Piecewise should use a different
syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
I need to implement Piecewise._eval_leading_term, which was previously
relying on Function's method
Comment #3 on issue 2626 by andy.ter...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
AFAIK we choose Mathematica's syntax
I suggested a default keyword but it wasn't implemented.
Comment #4 on issue 2626 by asmeurer: Piecewise should use a different
syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
It would work nice if we could use Python 3's keyword only arguments. Then
we could do Piecewise(*args, otherwise=None).
I actually prefer one
Comment #5 on issue 2626 by matt...@gmail.com: Piecewise should use a
different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
By the way, I'm not convinced that we need the ExprCondPair() object.
I'm sure we don't. I don't remember what was first, Tuple or
Comment #6 on issue 2626 by asmeurer: Piecewise should use a different
syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
I don't think so. We shouldn't confuse Tuples with Vectors. Tuple was
invented only for making args Basic.
I think I agree. We should only ever
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
CC: andy.ter...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.2
New issue 2626 by asmeurer: Piecewise should use a different syntax
for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
This is something that's been bothering
22 matches
Mail list logo
