Before of this patch, this calculation returned an AssertionError
(see issue #1051).
Adopted approach is to not use the assumptions framework for this
calculation. This is faster, but also, since we are slowly moving
the assumption system out of the core, this will have to be how
things are done
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Fabian Seoane wrote:
>
> Before of this patch, this calculation returned an AssertionError
> (see issue #1051).
The new version is worse, IMO. Instead of just asking whether the
argument is negative, it now needs to worry about details about the
evalf implementat
Yep, now it's +1, thanks!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Fabian Seoane wrote:
>
> Before of this patch, this calculation returned an AssertionError
> (see issue #1051).
>
> Adopted approach is to not use the assumptions framework for this
> calculation. This is faster, but also, since we are s
Did anyone try the module ? I'm quite curious to hear from the group,
because this is my first real contribution to sympy.
On Mar 12, 8:40 pm, Akshay Srinivasan
wrote:
> I've been hacking around with sympy for the past few weeks and I've
> managed to put together a Boolean algebra module. The m
Not yet, but I will try it later today and let you know. Thanks for
your contribution!
Ondrej
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Akshay Srinivasan
wrote:
>
> Did anyone try the module ? I'm quite curious to hear from the group,
> because this is my first real contribution to sympy.
>
>
> On Mar 1