Can someone (Brian?) review the [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/125
] and [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/128 ]? These have had no
comments in 2 weeks. I'm happy to commit them but am not the best one
to review them.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #40 on issue 1923 by smi...@gmail.com: count_ops doesn't return a
count (by default)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1923
This is in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To
Updates:
Labels: lazovich NeedsReview
Comment #4 on issue 2186 by asmeurer: X, Y, Z gates should be hermitian as
well as unitary
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2186
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Comment #31 on issue 2225 by mrock...@gmail.com: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
OK, given what has been said on the comments I'm going to shift the default
behavior of my branch back to Frobenius.
Given the simplicity of computing the Frobenius mat
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #11 on issue 1980 by smi...@gmail.com: has, has_any_symbols,
has_all_symbols unified
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1980
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Comment #30 on issue 2225 by pr...@goodok.ru: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
A detected the old issue 821 about max's improving, remarking that now
name-token is `Max` for this function in core since far. And this function
is placed in:
sympy/fun
Comment #29 on issue 2225 by pr...@goodok.ru: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
Thanks, Vinzent, for me I do not know exactly speciality for all kinds of
norms.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patch
Comment #28 on issue 2225 by pr...@goodok.ru: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
About `Max()` function improving, yes, I pro.
But my opinion is that it is separated (but little) issue though.
About `Norm(matrix)` object and `norm(matrix)` function: it is
Comment #27 on issue 2225 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
After looking at the Wikipedia article I agree that Frobenius is a sane
default. It is not really an approximation of the 2-norm, sorry for the
confusion.
The nice thi
Comment #26 on issue 2225 by pr...@goodok.ru: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
With a view to do not hung this issue, but remarking that I have not
observed logical grounds for consideration the Frobenius as "imitation",
remarking that it is simple n
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #4 on issue 511 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Plot has no docstring
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=511
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
Updates:
Labels: sean.v.775 NeedsReview
Comment #2 on issue 2220 by asmeurer: Bug with Matrix.is_symbolic and
Matrix.is_upper
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2220
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #25 on issue 2225 by asmeurer: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
I think Norm(matrix) is suggested to be an object, which is unevaluated by
default.
Usually stuff evaluates by default, if it can. If it can't do it, or if
you explicitly call
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview hector1618
Comment #6 on issue 1360 by asmeurer: "integrate" doesn't allow the use of
functions as the variable of integration.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1360
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message bec
Comment #24 on issue 2225 by mrock...@gmail.com: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
Regarding Frobenius vs Spectral/2-norm
Mathematically the spectral/2-norm is "the" standard norm just like the
euclidian/2-norm is standard for vectors. Vector norms hav
Comment #23 on issue 2225 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
The Frobenius is norm is a (numerically motivated) approximation of the
hard to calculate 2-norm. So I'm not sure if it makes sense as a symbolical
default.
I think we
Comment #22 on issue 2225 by pr...@goodok.ru: Enhancing Matrix Norm
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2225
And about `Norm(matrix)`, sorry, I have thought more. And, yes,
`Norm(matrix)` might be considered as operator, but I suppose that it is
not the question for this issue ri
17 matches
Mail list logo
