Issue 2383 in sympy: sqrt(-2*x*neg) gives wrong expansion

Status: Accepted Owner: smi...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr New issue 2383 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(-2*x*neg) gives wrong expansion http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2383 While working on 1847 I noticed this error. I'll include this with the

Re: Issue 2205 in sympy: Name for Undefined functions

Comment #21 on issue 2205 by pr...@goodok.ru: Name for Undefined functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2205 UndefinedFunction is somthing ambiguous. First of all, it imply that exist so called DefinedFunction (which remains by Function now?). But it is not so. E.g. sin(x)

Re: Issue 2303 in sympy: Function to access the oeis database

Comment #17 on issue 2303 by matt...@gmail.com: Function to access the oeis database http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303 @Aaron: That was the long term plan. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches group. To post to this

Re: Issue 527 in sympy: guessing what functions, like integrate, roots, factor, apart (and many more), should do with the given expression

Comment #12 on issue 527 by matt...@gmail.com: guessing what functions, like integrate, roots, factor, apart (and many more), should do with the given expression http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=527 Pull request is here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/317 -- You

Re: Issue 2178 in sympy: A singleton object for the identity function

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 2178 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: A singleton object for the identity function http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2178 It's in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches group. To

Re: Issue 2179 in sympy: Lambda refactoring

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #9 on issue 2179 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Lambda refactoring http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2179 It's in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 527 in sympy: guessing what functions, like integrate, roots, factor, apart (and many more), should do with the given expression

Comment #14 on issue 527 by matt...@gmail.com: guessing what functions, like integrate, roots, factor, apart (and many more), should do with the given expression http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=527 Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2307 in sympy: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and as_coeff_Mul

Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch -asmeurer NeedsReview smichr Comment #16 on issue 2307 by asmeurer: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and as_coeff_Mul http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307 See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/313 for Chris's removal branch. -- You

Re: Issue 2307 in sympy: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and as_coeff_Mul

Comment #17 on issue 2307 by asmeurer: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and as_coeff_Mul http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307 See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/313 for Chris's removal branch. Chris, Mateusz, others: which option do you think would be the cleanest? I

Re: Issue 2283 in sympy: Non-iterative 'in'

Updates: Labels: asmeurer Comment #12 on issue 2283 by asmeurer: Non-iterative 'in' http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2283 See https://github.com/mattpap/sympy/pull/1 and the original pull request. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2383 in sympy: sqrt(-2*x*neg) gives wrong expansion

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 2383 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(-2*x*neg) gives wrong expansion http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2383 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2377 in sympy: expand(log=True) could use a force option

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2377 by smi...@gmail.com: expand(log=True) could use a force option http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2377 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1766 in sympy: separatevars should use expand [was: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive]

Updates: Summary: separatevars should use expand [was: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive] Comment #71 on issue 1766 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars should use expand [was: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive] http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766 I'm just

Re: Issue 1847 in sympy: Powsimp returns wrong result

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #22 on issue 1847 by smi...@gmail.com: Powsimp returns wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1847 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches

Re: Issue 2307 in sympy: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and as_coeff_Mul

Issue 2307: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and as_coeff_Mul http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307 This issue is now blocking issue 2308. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2308 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this