Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.1 Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #5 on issue 2385 by asmeurer: Refactor Basic.sorted_key
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2385
So is it correct that your pull fixes the first four items (i.e.,
everything except replacing the old
Comment #13 on issue 2308 by smi...@gmail.com: Should we rename
primitive()? (and Expr.primitive() should call primitive())
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2308
Would 'kernel' be any better? The choicest or most essential or most vital
part of some idea or experience
--
Comment #14 on issue 2308 by asmeurer: Should we rename primitive()? (and
Expr.primitive() should call primitive())
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2308
If we were the mathematicians making up the names, that would be fine, but
unfortunately, that has already happened.
Comment #20 on issue 2307 by smi...@gmail.com: Duplicate methods:
as_coeff_mul and as_coeff_Mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307
as_coeff_mul could be .rat_mulargs and as_coeff_add could be .rat_addargs.
This would make it clear that you are getting a Rational, not slot
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #10 on issue 1592 by smi...@gmail.com: Pretty print Sum with a Sigma
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1592
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches
Comment #16 on issue 2308 by smi...@gmail.com: Should we rename
primitive()? (and Expr.primitive() should call primitive())
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2308
...oops, rat_gcd can't take the place of as_coeff_Mul, but as_coeff_Mul
could first call rat_gcd to get any
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr
New issue 2396 by smi...@gmail.com: RegularPolygon rotate is only spinning
the RP, not rotating it.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2396
see [
Comment #17 on issue 2308 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Should we rename
primitive()? (and Expr.primitive() should call primitive())
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2308
Well, if we have a clear docstring, I think primitive is fine. There are
contradictory definitions of words, so
Comment #20 on issue 1525 by smi...@gmail.com: No integration by
substitution
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1525
I wonder if f(g(x)).diff(g(x)) could be stored as D(f(u), u, {u:g(x)}) and
the subs method of Derivative would look for a substitution {u;g(x)} that
could be
Comment #14 on issue 2283 by smi...@gmail.com: Non-iterative 'in'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2283
Regarding comment 6, args_cnc splits the args up for you.
from sympy.abc import *
from sympy import *
var('n,m', commutative=False)
(n, m)
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr
New issue 2398 by smi...@gmail.com: remove msolve after 2 years of warning
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2398
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/333
--
You received this message
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr
New issue 2399 by smi...@gmail.com: use free_symbols in Integral.transform
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2399
To be safe the test for x in the solution obtained in the transform
Comment #1 on issue 2399 by smi...@gmail.com: use free_symbols in
Integral.transform
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2399
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/334
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #1 on issue 2398 by Vinzent.Steinberg: remove msolve after 2 years
of warning
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2398
Sorry, I thought this was already in. Thanks!
--
You received this message
Comment #18 on issue 2308 by asmeurer: Should we rename primitive()? (and
Expr.primitive() should call primitive())
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2308
Well, Chris inadvertently brought up a good point. (2*x/3 +
4*y/9).primitive() = (2/9, 2*y + 3*x) is wrong. It should
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium smichr NeedsReview
New issue 2400 by smi...@gmail.com: use deep in simplify's together call
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2400
see discussion at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/335
--
You
Comment #21 on issue 1525 by asmeurer: No integration by substitution
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1525
I'd rather not have workarounds. We should just fix issue 1620.
Derivative(f(x), g(x)) is wrong anyway.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #15 on issue 2283 by asmeurer: Non-iterative 'in'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2283
If you want to know where in is used, just comment out Basic.__contains__
and run the tests.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #11 on issue 2203 by asmeurer: doctest does not test IPython
interactive sessions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2203
This was pushed in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #26 on issue 1525 by smi...@gmail.com: No integration by
substitution
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1525
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/336; I just wrote factorial(x) as
gamma(x + 1) in the test and changed the other test
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer
Blockedon: 1620
Comment #13 on issue 2386 by asmeurer: gosper(...) is missing tests and
docstring
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2386
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/337 for the NotImplementedError.
--
You
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview smichr
Comment #17 on issue 1827 by smi...@gmail.com: log eval gives more standard
form
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1827
ok, log args are made square free of small factors with the additional
commit at
Comment #18 on issue 1827 by asmeurer: log eval gives more standard form
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1827
A few second sounds kind of long. How large is your factor limit?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To
23 matches
Mail list logo
