Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: matt...@gmail.com
Labels: Polynomial Milestone-Release0.7.0 NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2484 by matt...@gmail.com: Create Poly by coefficients
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2484
Pull request is here: https://g
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2485 by smi...@gmail.com: multiset_partitions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2485
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/416 fixes the returning of None from
multiset_partitions.
--
You received this message becaus
Comment #9 on issue 1797 by asmeurer: fix isympy for upcoming ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
Issue 2487 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this group,
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.1 Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #10 on issue 1797 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I changed the milestone, we need to fix this *before* this release.
Otherwise
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #5 on issue 2077 by smi...@gmail.com: classify_ode() doesn't catch
a 1st_linear/separable ode
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2077
see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/418
--
You received this message because you are subs
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 1858 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars doesn't supply
symbols when none are given
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1858
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/419
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #4 on issue 1782 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars(((1 + 2*x +
x**2)*exp(y**2))/(x*y + y), [x, y], dict=True) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1782
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/419
--
You received this mes
Updates:
Cc: elliso...@gmail.com
Labels: -Priority-High Priority-Critical Testing
Comment #11 on issue 1797 by asmeurer: fix isympy for upcoming ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I understand the need, but how quickly can this be fixed? From what
Comment #12 on issue 1797 by elliso...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
The next version of IPython will be released quite soon (in the next month)
and will have many new features that users will want to upgrade quickly
f
Comment #13 on issue 1797 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I agree with Aaron. I think 0.7.0 shouldn't try to support something that
hasn't been released yet, but nothing prevents us from releasing a 0.7.1
i
10 matches
Mail list logo