Nice patch, it's in, thanks!
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Vinzent Steinberg
vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Here is an improved patch.
Vinzent
2009/8/13 Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz
thanks!
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Vinzent
Steinbergvinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com
Here is an improved patch.
Vinzent
2009/8/13 Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz
thanks!
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Vinzent
Steinbergvinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Jochen, any progress on this? Your patch is ready to merge in my opinion,
if
you don't have have time to fix
thanks!
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Vinzent
Steinbergvinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Jochen, any progress on this? Your patch is ready to merge in my opinion, if
you don't have have time to fix the docstrings, I'll do this trivial stuff.
:)
Vinzent
2009/5/20 Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Vinzent Steinberg
vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/15 Jochen Voß jochen.v...@googlemail.com
Hi,
I'll be travelling for a few days and will be able to send a new patch
only sometimes next week. What I suggest to do is:
1) Remove the more
Hello, thanks for the patch!
Just a comment, see below:
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 19:54:18 Jochen Voss wrote:
The new method is slower than Matrix.LUsolve, but should be more stable.
The commit also fixes a closeby comment and adds a new docstring.
This fixes issue #907 from the issue
Hi Riccardo,
2009/5/14 Riccardo Gori goricca...@gmail.com:
+ # back substitution to solve R*x = y:
+ # We build up the result backwards in the vector 'x' and reverse
it + # only in the end.
+ x = []
+ n = R.lines
+ for j in range(n-1, -1, -1):
+ tmp = y[j,:]
Why do you use y[j,:]
Hi,
I'll be travelling for a few days and will be able to send a new patch
only sometimes next week. What I suggest to do is:
1) Remove the more stable wording from the QRsolve docstring.
2) Add warnings to the both the LUsolve and the QRsolve docstrings,
stating that these functions should
