Hi,
can someone please review my pu branch at github? It contains the
following patches:
$ git shortlog master..pu
Ondrej Certik (7):
test_sage: Use S() instead of sympify()
atan2(y, x) can now be converted to/from Sage
mpmath: test for sage_utils.bitcount
test_sage.py: a
I am testing your branch now. I also left some comments on your github.
Does the test_sage patch require sage to test? If it does, I won't be able to
review that one, as I don't have sage installed.
Aaron Meurer
On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone please
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
> I am testing your branch now. I also left some comments on your github.
>
> Does the test_sage patch require sage to test? If it does, I won't be able
> to review that one, as I don't have sage installed.
It does. Seems like noone was a
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
>> I am testing your branch now. I also left some comments on your github.
>>
>> Does the test_sage patch require sage to test? If it does, I won't be able
>> to review that one, as
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
I am testing your branch now. I also left some comments on your github.
Does the test_sage patch require sage to test? If it does, I won't be able to
review that one, as I don't have sage installed.
It does. Seem
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Toon Verstraelen
wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Aaron S. Meurer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am testing your branch now. I also left some comments on your github.
>>>
>>> Does the test_sage patch require sage to test? If it does, I
