Hi,
The TLS transport draft now is ready for your comments and recommodations.
Some issues are identified in the documents, which should be discussed in
the mailing list. I list the issues here.
[Issue 0]: Do we need a Syslog TCP port for TLS transport? The
security community had debates
Miao,
thanks for the great (and quick) work. I can not review it fully right
now, but I have seen one issue that I would like to comment immediately
on. More comments follow later.
>[Issue 3] The problem of CR LF is it can not process binary data
>well. How to process Syslog signature/ce
Thanks for your quick response!
Comments inline!
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:56 PM
> To: Miao Fuyou
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Preliminary syslog-transport-tls
> document - issue 3
>
>
Hi,
This is an issue that we need to discuss. I've had some discussions with
various people on this subject who's opinions I trust. They also suggest
that we do have 2 options as Rainer states. Let me describe this in a bit
more detail:
The consensus from all is that syslog-protocol shoul
Hi,
Just FYI - The article is about the US NIST's effort to standardize event
message formats. The link to the NIST workshop is:
http://csrc.nist.gov/CLIX/
Thanks,
Chris
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:40:37 -0800
From: Jian Zhen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
