Chris,
Sorry, I obviously had a previous copy cached... I've just downloaded a
fresh one and started re-reading it. As you say, it already is adapted
to syslog-protocol.
Let me raise one point without being completely through with it: -sign
now supports RFC 3164, 3195 and -protocol format. I see
Miao,
I am actually concerned about backward compatibility with existing code
*without* the need to upgrade any of that code. As you know, deployed
software tends to stick.
If we use just LF, existing, deployed technology (e.g. syslog-ng with
stunnel) would be able to understand a message sent fr
Hi, Rainer,
A new implementation could rely on byte-counting only and then delete LF
from the frame(appplication knows exactly where the LF is), it may not force
us to use escapes. For LF, I think it is difficult to get 100% compatibility
for a legacy implementation to comply TLS-transport witho
Hi,
When can we get an updated revision of syslog-sign?
Our current timeline calls for starting WGLC Aug 28. The changes sound
sufficiently large that we should definitely try to review the changes
before we start a last call on the document.
David Harrington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
This message officially starts the Syslog Working Group Last Call for
the following two documents:
draft-ietf-syslog-protocol:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-17.txt
draft-ietf-syslog-transport-udp:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-transpor
Hi Tom,
You're right; I didn't go far enough. I was looking for a framing
defined by the netconf protocol, not the separator of messages within
a transport. Unfortunately, Netconf uses a number of
transport-dependent schemes within the multiple transports it
supports, including both octet-counting
Hi All,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
Hi,
A general comment: syslog-sign is still based on rfc 3164 and has ist own
format definitions. It needs to be edited to utilize the new work in
syslog-protocol. It should now use structured data for ist signature blocks.
Alex has moved
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 8:20 AM
> To: Tom Petch
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] delineated datagrams
>
> Hi Tom and All,
>
> What I've seen discussed:
> - There is no character or character se
Hi Tom and All,
What I've seen discussed:
- There is no character or character sequence that cannot be used in the
syslog payload, which might confuse a parser looking to delineate
messages in a single packet based upon a character or character
sequence.
- Byte counting can provide assuranc
- Original Message -
From: "David Harrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 7:33 PM
Subject: [Syslog] timeline
>
> 1) whether draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls should use byte-counting,
> special character, or both, including which special chara
10 matches
Mail list logo
