On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> 2011/10/9 Cliff Brake :
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Cliff Brake wrote:
>> However, it does not work for subsequent NIC insertions. It appears
>> that stop is not getting executed when the device is removed, as
>> network@eth0.servic
On Fri, 07.10.11 17:24, Cliff Brake (cliff.br...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to customize systemd to start/stop network interfaces in an
> embedded system (OpenEmbedded/Angstrom). Angstrom has some support
> for systemd and its working fairly well so far. Are there any
> examples I c
On Sat, 08.10.11 00:39, Koen Kooi (k...@beagleboard.org) wrote:
>
>
> Op 7 okt 2011, om 23:24 heeft Cliff Brake het volgende geschreven:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm trying to customize systemd to start/stop network interfaces in an
> >embedded system (OpenEmbedded/Angstrom). Angstrom has some support
On Sat, 08.10.11 11:09, Cliff Brake (cliff.br...@gmail.com) wrote:
> ENV{key} Match against a device property value.
>
> And from systemd documentation:
>
> systemd.device: SYSTEMD_WANTS= Adds dependencies of type Wants from
> this unit to all listed units. This may be used to activate arbitrary
On Sat, 08.10.11 23:34, Cliff Brake (cliff.br...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Cliff Brake wrote:
> >> and a service file like this:
> >>
> >> cat networl@.service:
> >> [Service]
> >> Type=oneshot
> >> RemainAfterExit=yes
> >> ExecStart=/sbin/ifup %i
> >> ExecStop=/sbin
On Thu, 06.10.11 15:03, Clyde E. Kunkel (clydekunkel7...@cox.net) wrote:
> >We have got a bit further along using netconsole to see the kmsg
> >after systemd turns off syslog.
> >
> >
> >The obvious difference between a reboot that works and one that
> >fails is that I see these lines in the g
On Thu, 06.10.11 15:56, Barry Scott (barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk) wrote:
> We can reproducably get an F15 system in a state that it fails to
> complete a reboot.
>
> Becuase all the logging, network and getty's has been stopped all
> we can see is the kernel messages on the console.
>
> What we nee
On Wed, 05.10.11 22:31, Thomas Jarosch (thomas.jaro...@intra2net.com) wrote:
> Detected by "cppcheck" (actually it detected a file descriptor leak)
Thanks! Applied both changes. (after fixing some indentation issues)
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
On Thu, 06.10.11 13:14, Albert Strasheim (full...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29, Albert Strasheim wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Albert Strasheim wrote:
> >>> Hello all
> >>> I have the followin
On Tue, 04.10.11 14:22, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> Hi
>
> would it be possible to backport "PathExistsGlob" for F15
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734435
>
> this means we can not make a backport-rebuild for F15 without
> reverting this patch currently :-(
I
On Mon, 03.10.11 11:50, Barry Scott (barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk) wrote:
> This means that section headers must be used inside of
> a .include file otherwise all the lines are ignored.
Thanks! applied both with some changes (i.e. changed "env var" to
"environment variable").
Lennart
--
Lennart Po
On Sun, 02.10.11 20:07, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
> Make would choke on missing rules for man/systemd.1
Hmm, I think this is a misunderstanding:
The original idea here was to require xsltproc when you build from git,
but ship the pre-generated man pages in the tarball so that
On Fri, 30.09.11 11:54, Paolo Bonzini (bonz...@gnu.org) wrote:
> When enabling readahead on my system (which has a 5400rpm hard drive)
> "systemd-analyze blame" output is like this:
>
> 19507ms udev.service
> 18336ms fedora-storage-init.service
> 13254ms var-lock.mount
> 12960ms v
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:17, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 02.10.11 20:07, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
>
>> Make would choke on missing rules for man/systemd.1
>
> Hmm, I think this is a misunderstanding:
>
> The original idea here was to require xsltproc when you build f
On Fri, 30.09.11 16:26, Paolo Bonzini (bonz...@gnu.org) wrote:
>
> On 09/30/2011 03:39 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >Sure. I just think that this is not what we really want in the end.
>
> That I agree with, but good is the enemy of perfect...
Here's my recommendation how to achieve the same effect
On Tue, 11.10.11 01:36, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:17, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 02.10.11 20:07, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
> >
> >> Make would choke on missing rules for man/systemd.1
> >
> > Hmm, I think this is a m
On Fri, 30.09.11 16:52, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 09/30/2011 03:39 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >>
> >> Sure. I just think that this is not what we really want in the end.
> >
> > That I agree with, but good is the enemy of p
On Mon, 03.10.11 13:06, Stephan Kulow (co...@suse.de) wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 16:52:01 schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 09/30/2011 03:39 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > >> Sure. I just think that this is not what we really wa
On Fri, 30.09.11 20:56, c...@endlessnow.com (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
> The idea that separate / from /usr is archaic or wrong is
> incorrect. Just saying... Think about it for a bit... Because if you
> still believe that to be true...then it is /usr that must go away.
The thing one cannot und
On Fri, 30.09.11 09:07, Nick Urbanik (ni...@nicku.org) wrote:
>
> Dear Folks,
> On 29/09/11 21:21 +1000, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> >Dear Michal,
> >
> >Thank you for your helpful response.
> >
> >On 29/09/11 12:19 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> >>Since ssh login works, you can get some debug informat
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:59, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 11.10.11 01:36, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
> Fix xsltproc? Hmm? What do you mean? What should it to differently? I
> mean, if it isn't installed it can't do anything differently, can it?
It's kinda broken when run
On Thu, 29.09.11 14:29, Daniel Drake (d...@laptop.org) wrote:
> sysrq-T (show task state) shows the following userspace processes running:
> systemd, udevd (several threads/instances), systemd-stdout-,
> systemd-kmsg-sy, plymouthd. (they are all epolling stuff)
>
> Can you confirm that at this po
On Tue, 27.09.11 20:51, Miklos Vajna (vmik...@frugalware.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See the attached patch, one less compat define. :)
Awesome. Thanks a ton. Applied.
I wished I could do similar patches for Fedora, too...
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
_
On Mon, 26.09.11 09:25, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
Thanks a lot. Applied!
> ---
> src/sd-login.h |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/sd-login.h b/src/sd-login.h
> index 7102eb8..0cb0bf0 100644
> --- a/src/sd-login.h
> +++ b/src/sd-
On Sat, 24.09.11 12:04, Ran Benita (ran...@gmail.com) wrote:
> It's documented in the --help, but not in the manpage.
Thanks. Applied!
> ---
> man/systemctl.xml |7 +++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/man/systemctl.xml b/man/systemctl.xml
> index 468
On Tue, 20.09.11 09:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> s/siedzenie/stanowisko/: they both translate to seat in English, but
> 'stanowisko'
> is a place where you work, while 'siedzenie' is like a chair.
>
> s/podłączanie/podłączenie/: we are doing it now, now sometime i
Hi all,
It seems plymouth-quit.service hasn't ever been activated on my Fedora15:
systemctl status plymouth-quit.service
plymouth-quit.service - Terminate Plymouth Boot Screen
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/plymouth-quit.service)
Active: inactive (dead)
CGroup: name=systemd:/system/plym
On Tue, 11.10.11 10:35, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems plymouth-quit.service hasn't ever been activated on my Fedora15:
> systemctl status plymouth-quit.service
> plymouth-quit.service - Terminate Plymouth Boot Screen
> Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/plymouth-quit.s
You are thinking of a scenario that you believe is the most important...
Nothing wrong, just saying your making some general assumptions.
- Reply message -
From: "Lennart Poettering"
To: "c...@endlessnow.com"
Cc:
Subject: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] readahead: read /usr files last for
ro
On 10/11/2011 02:07 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Any such logic in splitting the boot phase into two phases for read
ahead is very arbitrary I'd claim. Why just two phases, and why
precisely place the delimiter of the two phases at basic.target?
Because udev.service, network.target and local-f
30 matches
Mail list logo
