On Mon, 26.03.12 21:25, Marti Raudsepp (ma...@juffo.org) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 21:07, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Marti, sorry for changing my mind on this: would be great if you could
> > prep a patch for this for systemd itself.
>
> D'oh, I already prepared a patch for kexec,
On Mon, 26.03.12 18:24, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
> > Opinions? Is this kind of overloading ugly? I am tempted to say it's
> > pretty OK, what do you say?
>
> My OCD says otherwise, but I think this seems like a reasonable
> solution, since the options end up being mutually exclus
On Thu, 22.03.12 12:36, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
> > I have now commited a patch to git that might fix your issue. Please
> > test:
> >
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=75c8e3cffd7da8eede614cf61384957af2c82a29
> >
> > I assume this fixes your proble
On Thu, 22.03.12 13:07, Frederic Crozat (fcro...@suse.com) wrote:
> > > Normally, when the pam session close hooks are called logind responds to
> > > this by killing the main process of the session if it still
> > > exists. This is probably the source of the problem here.
> >
> > I have now comm
On Thu, 22.03.12 12:11, Christian Hesse (l...@eworm.de) wrote:
> > > Do you have audit enabled in the kernel and are using pam_loginuid?
> > >
> > > Normally, when the pam session close hooks are called logind responds to
> > > this by killing the main process of the session if it still
> > > exi
On Thu, 22.03.12 08:48, Koen Kooi (k...@beagleboard.org) wrote:
> > I tried adding this line as suggested, to almost every file in /etc/pam.d,
> > but it seems to silently not have any effect at all:
> >
> >> session required pam_systemd.so create-session=1 kill-user=0 kill-session=0
> >
> > It
Hi,
why is /media a tmpfs? I think that violates user expectations that
/media will be persistent across reboots, in particular any directories
created and such.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
___
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> why is /media a tmpfs? I think that violates user expectations that
> /media will be persistent across reboots, in particular any directories
> created and such.
It is expected that /media will contain directories for mountpoin
]] Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > why is /media a tmpfs? I think that violates user expectations that
> > /media will be persistent across reboots, in particular any directories
> > created and such.
>
> It is expected th
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 16:21, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>>
>> why is /media a tmpfs? I think that violates user expectations that
>> /media will be persistent across reboots, in particular any directories
>> created and such.
>
>
On Tue, 27.03.12 15:36, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> why is /media a tmpfs? I think that violates user expectations that
> /media will be persistent across reboots, in particular any directories
> created and such.
/media is where deaemons such as udisks dynamically mount
On Tue, 27.03.12 16:53, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
> ]] Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > why is /media a tmpfs? I think that violates user expectations that
> > > /media will be persistent across reb
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 16:53, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > why is /media a tmpfs? I think that violates user expectations that
>> > /media will be persistent across reboots, in particul
]] Lennart Poettering
> On Tue, 27.03.12 16:53, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
>
> > ]] Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > why is /media a tmpfs? I think that violates user expectations that
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Lennart Poettering
>
>> On Tue, 27.03.12 16:53, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
>>
>> > ]] Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> >
>> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > why
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 26.03.12 21:25, Marti Raudsepp (ma...@juffo.org) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 21:07, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > Marti, sorry for changing my mind on this: would be great if you could
> > > prep a p
16 matches
Mail list logo
