Are there any plans to propose projects for GSoC 2013? I've mentored
before on behalf of Drupal.
--
David Strauss
| da...@davidstrauss.net
| +1 512 577 5827 [mobile]
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.f
2013/3/6 David Strauss :
> Log Viewer (gnome-system-log) is a basic, graphical log file viewer
> bundled with GNOME desktops and useful for anyone with GTK+.
>
> Is there any interest in adding (optional) journal support to this
> program? Are there other up-and-coming log viewers that would be
> b
Has CEE seen any widespread deployment? It would be straightforward to
add the following to the journal:
* Optional conversion of non-binary fields to CEE for forwarding to syslog
* Conversion of CEE to journal fields within the systemd syslog server
* Conversion of CEE to journal fields when a
Log Viewer (gnome-system-log) is a basic, graphical log file viewer
bundled with GNOME desktops and useful for anyone with GTK+.
Is there any interest in adding (optional) journal support to this
program? Are there other up-and-coming log viewers that would be
better to focus on?
The application
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:24:27PM -0800, Nathaniel Chen wrote:
> SMACK is the Simple Mandatory Access Control Kernel, a minimal
> approach to Access Control implemented as a kernel LSM.
>
> The kernel exposes the smackfs filesystem API through which access
> rules can be loaded. At boot time, we
SMACK is the Simple Mandatory Access Control Kernel, a minimal
approach to Access Control implemented as a kernel LSM.
The kernel exposes the smackfs filesystem API through which access
rules can be loaded. At boot time, we want to load the access rules
as early as possible to ensure all early boo
2013/3/5 Holger Winkelmann
>
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>
> 2013/3/5 Holger Winkelmann
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:52 PM, David Strauss wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Holger Winkelmann
>> wrote:
>> >> Or is there a special journal socke
On Mar 5, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> 2013/3/5 Holger Winkelmann
> Hi David,
>
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:52 PM, David Strauss wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Holger Winkelmann
> > wrote:
> >> Or is there a special journal socket to write to?
> >
> > Yes, and the P
On 05/03/13 21:03, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> My general suggestion is that applications should generally die if their
> display goes away (libX11 already enforces this...).
Right, but that only happens for GUI applications. One of the original
rationales for D-Bus was that it was a way to avoid
On Tue, 05.03.13 21:01, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
>
> On 05/03/13 20:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Well, D-Bus would need to learn about this new [user] bus, and determine the
> > socket in $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR automatically, and also fallback from the
> > session to
2013/3/5 Holger Winkelmann
> Hi David,
>
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:52 PM, David Strauss wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Holger Winkelmann
> wrote:
> >> Or is there a special journal socket to write to?
> >
> > Yes, and the Python module's use of the C library wraps all of that.
> >
>
On Tue, 05.03.13 21:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:11:28PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > From the GNOME perspective I am pretty sure
> > multiple-sessions-per-local-user is out of scope.
> That would be really sad. The multi-sessio
Hi David,
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:52 PM, David Strauss wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Holger Winkelmann
> wrote:
>> Or is there a special journal socket to write to?
>
> Yes, and the Python module's use of the C library wraps all of that.
>
> Auke is also correct that you can write t
On Mon, 18.02.13 20:13, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
>
> On 18/02/13 19:08, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Simon McVittie
> > wrote:
> >> It looks as though the intention is [...]
> >> I have one XDG_RUNTIME_DIR, one 'systemd
> >> --user' in
On 05/03/13 20:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Well, D-Bus would need to learn about this new [user] bus, and determine the
> socket in $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR automatically, and also fallback from the
> session to the user bus if the session bus is not reachable otherwise...
Do you really want to suppor
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Holger Winkelmann wrote:
> Or is there a special journal socket to write to?
Yes, and the Python module's use of the C library wraps all of that.
Auke is also correct that you can write to stderr/stdout from a
service running in systemd. That does not support str
Hi,
hoe is het met je?
Stef
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:11:28PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> From the GNOME perspective I am pretty sure
> multiple-sessions-per-local-user is out of scope.
That would be really sad. The multi-session stuff is really cool, and
the whole stack should support logging in more than once.
Zbys
On Tue, 05.03.13 22:05, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 18.02.13 11:08, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
> >> For each login, you'd have an instance service (e.g.
> >> gnome-session@:0.service)
On Tue, 05.03.13 11:59, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 18.02.13 11:08, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
> >
> >> I believe that the DBus bits are properly in place to have one single
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 18.02.13 11:08, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
>>> For each login, you'd have an instance service (e.g.
>>> gnome-session@:0.service) to serve that
On Tue, 05.03.13 14:32, Daniel Wallace (danielwall...@gtmanfred.com) wrote:
> implement 1883552c3d8 from bash completion in zsh-completion
Thanks, applied!
> ---
> shell-completion/systemd-zsh-completion.zsh | 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/shell-completion
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 18.02.13 11:08, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
>> For each login, you'd have an instance service (e.g.
>> gnome-session@:0.service) to serve that display.
>
> Well, I am not convinced it is necessary to instanti
On Tue, 05.03.13 11:46, Nathaniel Chen (nathaniel.c...@intel.com) wrote:
Thanks! Applied!
> this addresses the bug at:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
>
> hostnamectl is supposed to allow a range of special characters for
> the 'pretty' hostname:
> $ hostnamectl set-host
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 18.02.13 11:08, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
>
>> I believe that the DBus bits are properly in place to have one single
>> user bus per user session.
>
> Nope, we never finished that. However, you currently c
this addresses the bug at:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
hostnamectl is supposed to allow a range of special characters for
the 'pretty' hostname:
$ hostnamectl set-hostname --pretty "Nathaniels Desktop !@#$%"
..however, it rejects apostrophes, double quotes, and backslash
On Mon, 18.02.13 11:08, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
> I believe that the DBus bits are properly in place to have one single
> user bus per user session.
Nope, we never finished that. However, you currently can invoke
"dbus-daemon --session" in a per-user rather than per-sess
On Mon, 18.02.13 12:38, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
Heya!
(Sorry for the late reply, still fighting against my mail queue after a
week of confs).
> I've recently been researching systemd's current support for user
> sessions, with the goal of sorting out any remaining
implement 1883552c3d8 from bash completion in zsh-completion
---
shell-completion/systemd-zsh-completion.zsh | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/shell-completion/systemd-zsh-completion.zsh
b/shell-completion/systemd-zsh-completion.zsh
index 46e29b2..77b26f6 100644
---
On Mon, 04.03.13 19:00, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
>
> On 04/03/13 14:31, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > So here's how to do this, it's very simple: every char outside of the
> > A-Za-z0-9 range is escaped as "_XY" where XY is the numeric code of the
> > char, as 2 char
On Tue, 05.03.13 08:16, Holger Winkelmann (h...@travelping.com) wrote:
>
> I Like the idea as well to have direct DBus access to systemd.
>
> Regarding your example of the journal wrapper. Anybody knows the API
> to write to the journal without using the C library? Is this DBus
> transport as we
On Tue, 05.03.13 15:56, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> This allows switch-root to work correctly if a unit is active both before and
> after the switch-root, but its dependencies change. Before the patch, any
> dependencies added to active units by switch-root will not be pulled, in
> parti
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Holger Winkelmann wrote:
> I Like the idea as well to have direct DBus access to systemd.
>
> Regarding your example of the journal wrapper. Anybody knows the API to write
> to the journal without using the C library? Is this DBus transport as well?
> Or is there
Am 05.03.2013 02:05, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Mon, 04.03.13 10:43, Harald Hoyer (har...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
>
>> +if (initrd) {
>> +char _cleanup_free_ *mu = NULL, *name = NULL;
>> +/* Skip generation, if unit alrea
On Tue, 05.03.13 03:36, systemdki...@yopmail.com (systemdki...@yopmail.com)
wrote:
>
> Thank you Lennart. I wonder how your tip compares to our result? Our
> method employs getty.target and local-fs.target. It works but we prefer
> the Right Thing (tm). Would systemd-user-sessions.service be bet
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> 2013/3/5
>>
>> Thank you Lennart. I wonder how your tip compares to our result? Our
>> method employs getty.target and local-fs.target. It works but we prefer
>> the Right Thing (tm). Would systemd-user-sessions.service be better for
>> any
2013/3/5
> Thank you Lennart. I wonder how your tip compares to our result? Our
> method employs getty.target and local-fs.target. It works but we prefer
> the Right Thing (tm). Would systemd-user-sessions.service be better for
> any reason? Here's our unit as it sits. Thanks for your input.
>
>
Am 05.03.2013 07:56, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> This allows switch-root to work correctly if a unit is active both before and
> after the switch-root, but its dependencies change. Before the patch, any
> dependencies added to active units by switch-root will not be pulled, in
> particular filesystems
Am 05.03.2013 07:28, schrieb har...@redhat.com:
> From: Harald Hoyer
>
> only checks for /run/systemd/generator/*.mount
> ---
> src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c | 15 +++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
> b/src/fstab-ge
Am 05.03.2013 07:28, schrieb har...@redhat.com:
> From: Harald Hoyer
>
> ---
> src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c | 11 ++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
> b/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
> index fade
Am 05.03.2013 10:07, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Am 05.03.2013 09:56, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>> Am 05.03.2013 09:17, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>>> Am 05.03.2013 08:33, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
For me the sysroot-usr.mount is not mounted in my testsuite unless I patch
it
like mentioned above.
>>
Am 05.03.2013 09:56, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Am 05.03.2013 09:17, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>> Am 05.03.2013 08:33, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>>> For me the sysroot-usr.mount is not mounted in my testsuite unless I patch
>>> it
>>> like mentioned above.
>>
>> switch_root:/# ls /sysroot/usr/
>> switch_root
Am 05.03.2013 09:17, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Am 05.03.2013 08:33, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>> For me the sysroot-usr.mount is not mounted in my testsuite unless I patch it
>> like mentioned above.
>
> switch_root:/# ls /sysroot/usr/
> switch_root:/# systemctl status sysroot-usr.mount
> sysroot-usr.mo
Am 05.03.2013 08:33, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> For me the sysroot-usr.mount is not mounted in my testsuite unless I patch it
> like mentioned above.
switch_root:/# ls /sysroot/usr/
switch_root:/# systemctl status sysroot-usr.mount
sysroot-usr.mount - /sysroot/usr
Loaded: loaded (/sysroot/e
Am 05.03.2013 08:32, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> Am 05.03.2013 07:56, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
>>> This allows switch-root to work correctly if a unit is active both before
>>> and
>>> after the switch-root, but its dependencies change. Before the
45 matches
Mail list logo
