On 09/10/2013 06:46 AM, David Strauss wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> Linux Foundation is looking into it. Right now they don't have space, but
>> they
>> are trying to find something for us. We should know early/mid next week.
>
> Any word on this?
>
They res
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 06.09.13 14:53, Robert Schiele (rschi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> I was choosing the interface described above since according to my
>> observation this seems closest to how interfaces were constructed in
>> this area before. I
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 02:34:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 06.09.13 14:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think we should remove all recommendations to use -x for bug
> > reports. Generic explanations are not useful one you know the b
On Tuesday 2013-09-10 02:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>On Fri, 06.09.13 14:53, Robert Schiele (rschi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>One possibility might be to add a new extended mount option (i.e. as
>listed in fstab's fourth column) that systemd
>would interpret. i.e. "x-systemd.yesfsck" or so. That s
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:40:32PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 2013-09-10 02:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >On Fri, 06.09.13 14:53, Robert Schiele (rschi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >One possibility might be to add a new extended mount option (i.e. as
> >listed in fstab's fourth c
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:40:32PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 2013-09-10 02:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >On Fri, 06.09.13 14:53, Robert Schiele (rschi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >
>> >One possibility might be to add a new
On Tuesday 2013-09-10 13:52, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> the FUSE program knows
>> nothing about the systemd-specific "nofail" or "x-*".
>
>This should only be a problem if you directly use the FUSE mount helper.
>If you instead invoke mount with -t fuse.$fusetype, then this isn't an
>issue. mount(8) *
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 2013-09-10 13:52, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>> the FUSE program knows
>>> nothing about the systemd-specific "nofail" or "x-*".
>>
>>This should only be a problem if you directly use the FUSE mount helper.
>>If you instead invoke mou
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:45:01 +0200,
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:23 PM, MUNEDA Takahiro
wrote:
Ok, I found out another problem.
Even if I have a following udev rules and 'remove' event happens, no
systemd service will be called.
ACTION=="add|remove", TAG+="systemd", ENV{SY
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 02:25:19 +0200,
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 09.09.13 17:23, MUNEDA Takahiro (muneda.takah...@jp.fujitsu.com) wrote:
Ok, I found out another problem.
Even if I have a following udev rules and 'remove' event happens, no
systemd service will be called.
ACTION=="add|
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:14 PM, MUNEDA Takahiro
wrote:
>> Udev still does all what did before systemd. It was never really able
>> to run or start long-running tasks. Udev can only reliably handle
>> synchronously started and very short-living programs, and that was
>> always the case.
>
>
> Ahh
On Tue, 10.09.13 12:23, Robert Schiele (rschi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 06.09.13 14:53, Robert Schiele (rschi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> I was choosing the interface described above since according to my
> >> observa
On Wed, 28.08.13 19:27, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Applied! Thanks!
(Added a longer comment though)
> ---
> TODO | 2 --
> src/core/service.c | 4
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
> index fe305ec..3527970 100644
>
On Fri, 30.08.13 10:56, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> if we get BlockIOReadBandwidth="", we should only remove the
> read-bandwidth-entries in blockio_device_bandwidths list.
Thanks! Applied, though with one change:
> +read = streq("BlockIOReadBandwidth", lvalue);
> +
>
On Fri, 30.08.13 10:56, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> This patch adds the support for setting up BlockIORead/WriteBandwidth
> in bus_cgroup_set_property.
Thanks!
Applied!
> ---
> src/core/dbus-cgroup.c | 101
> +
> 1 file changed, 1
On Fri, 30.08.13 10:56, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> This patch allows user to set up BlockIOReadBandwidth and
> BlockIOWriteBandwidth
> for unit through systemctl. Such as
>
> systemctl set-property sshd.service BlockIOReadBandwidth="/dev/sda 10"
> systemctl set-property sshd.
Hi Shawn,
thank you for attacking this, and sorry for the long delay in answering.
I think that the approach of copying working code from elsewhere for this
is right, but I think it should go into its own file, so that two coding
styles are not mixed.
Also, can those new functions replace normal e
On Tue, 27.08.13 13:36, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> This patch allows user to set up BlockIODeviceWeight for unit
> through systemctl. Such as
Thanks!
Applied!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
systemd-devel mailing li
On Fri, 23.08.13 15:09, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> ---
> src/core/mount.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/mount.c b/src/core/mount.c
> index c7d29b0..7838e60 100644
> --- a/src/core/mount.c
> +++ b/src/core/mount.c
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @
On Monday 2013-09-09 01:17, Shawn wrote:
>ping
Lennart was away in (what seems to be) South America,
systemd progress is resuming now. :)
>> This version counts all multibyte characters as 1 width, not taking into
>> account double width cjk characters and zerowidth characters
_
Hi all,
when trying to disable network access to the PHP-FPM service I noticed
that the service was no longer able to call back to systemd using
Type=notify. Systemd then kills the service when reaching the timeout.
It seems this could be a limitation by design in which case we might
want to warn
On Fri, 23.08.13 15:09, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> This means we can use default dependencies on mount units without having to
> get them automatically
> ordered before the filesystem targets.
Looks good. But before we merge this, Harald, can you comment? Any issue
with this?
>
> Re
On Mon, 26.08.13 13:48, Chengwei Yang (chengwei.y...@intel.com) wrote:
Hmm, can you elaborate on this one? libsystemd-login should be mostly
passive, why would it need to change labels? What's the missing link
here precisely?
> ---
> Makefile.am |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> di
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:36:26 +0200,
Kay Sievers wrote:
Udev still does all what did before systemd. It was never really able
to run or start long-running tasks. Udev can only reliably handle
synchronously started and very short-living programs, and that was
always the case.
Ahh, you are corr
On Thu, 22.08.13 14:47, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Thanks!
Applied!
> ---
> man/tmpfiles.d.xml | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/man/tmpfiles.d.xml b/man/tmpfiles.d.xml
> index 6a2193d..30e1314 100644
> --- a/man/tmpfiles.d.xml
> +++ b/man/tmpfiles.d
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 23.08.13 15:09, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
>> ---
>> src/core/mount.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>.
>> diff --git a/src/core/mount.c b/src/core/mount.c
>> index c7d29b0..7838e60 100644
>
On Fri, 23.08.13 15:09, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> This moves reduces redundancy between systemd core and the fstab-generator, by
> improving and relying on the DefaultDependencies logic.
Commented on two patches. The others look good, please commit those!
> Functional changes:
>
>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 23.08.13 15:51, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
>
>>
>> First, thanks for working on this, most of these patches look sane to
>> me.
>>
>> On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 15:09 +0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>
>> > +if (pat
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 28.08.13 13:12, Michael Marineau (michael.marin...@coreos.com)
> wrote:
>
> > This enables a getty on active kernel consoles even when they are not
> > the last one specified on the kernel command line and mapped to
> > /dev/cons
On Mon, 26.08.13 11:19, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> Hi
>
> The SYSTEMD.CGROUP(5) said if MemoryLimit=bytes is set for unit, it
> implies MemeoryAccounting=true for this unit.
>
> But seems systemd didn't implement this hint. CPUShares & BlockIO have
> the same problem, this is a s
'Twas brillig, and Tom Gundersen at 10/09/13 18:54 did gyre and gimble:
> I'm not too keen on a blacklist. It would work for the simple case of
> course, but I have seen lots of fancy/complicated stuff being mounted
> in the initrd for people doing live media/install discs, which I
> really don't t
On Fri, 23.08.13 15:51, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
>
> First, thanks for working on this, most of these patches look sane to
> me.
>
> On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 15:09 +0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
> > +if (path_equal(m->where, "/") ||
> > +path_equal(m->where, "/u
On Mon, 26.08.13 13:06, Chengwei Yang (chengwei.y...@intel.com) wrote:
> build systemd-gpt-auto-generator only if have blkid, otherwise, it will
> fail.
Tahnks! Already fixed now, with a pretty much identical patch from Marcel.
> ---
> Makefile.am |2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
On Wed, 28.08.13 13:12, Michael Marineau (michael.marin...@coreos.com) wrote:
> This enables a getty on active kernel consoles even when they are not
> the last one specified on the kernel command line and mapped to
> /dev/console. Now the order "console=ttyS0 console=tty0" works in
> addition to
On Tue, 27.08.13 13:36, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> We can use systemctl show unitname to show the BlockIODeviceWeight
> of unit.
Applied! Thanks!
> ---
> src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 18 ++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemc
On Sun, 25.08.13 09:01, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@inai.de) wrote:
Thanks!
Applied!
> This includes regularly-submitted corrections to comma setting and
> orthographical mishaps that appeared in man/ in recent commits.
>
> In this particular commit:
> - the usual comma fixes
> - expand contraction
'Twas brillig, and Tom Gundersen at 10/09/13 13:45 did gyre and gimble:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 2013-09-10 13:52, Dave Reisner wrote:
the FUSE program knows
nothing about the systemd-specific "nofail" or "x-*".
>>>
>>> This should only be
On Tue, 27.08.13 13:36, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> This patch adds the support for setting up BlockIODeviceWeight
> in bus_cgroup_set_property. most of the codes are copied from
> the case that sets up DeviceAllow.
Thanks!
Applied!
> ---
> src/core/dbus-cgroup.c | 85
> +++
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 18:47 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I'd actually prefer having an explicit blacklist for this, so that we
> don't have to trust the initrd too much that...
But nowadays it's systemd running in the initrd, what's not to trust?
> However, I'd really like to see this blac
On Sep 10, 2013 6:41 PM, "Jan Engelhardt" wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 2013-09-10 17:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >On Wed, 28.08.13 13:12, Michael Marineau (michael.marin...@coreos.com)
wrote:
> >
> >> This enables a getty on active kernel consoles even when they are not
> >> the last one specified
On Tuesday 2013-09-10 17:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>On Wed, 28.08.13 13:12, Michael Marineau (michael.marin...@coreos.com) wrote:
>
>> This enables a getty on active kernel consoles even when they are not
>> the last one specified on the kernel command line and mapped to
>> /dev/console. Now t
On 09/10/2013 11:50 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 26.08.13 11:19, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The SYSTEMD.CGROUP(5) said if MemoryLimit=bytes is set for unit, it
>> implies MemeoryAccounting=true for this unit.
>>
>> But seems systemd didn't implement this hint
On 09/10/2013 11:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 30.08.13 10:56, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>
>> if we get BlockIOReadBandwidth="", we should only remove the
>> read-bandwidth-entries in blockio_device_bandwidths list.
>
> Thanks! Applied, though with one change:
>
>> +
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:02:55PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 26.08.13 13:48, Chengwei Yang (chengwei.y...@intel.com) wrote:
>
> Hmm, can you elaborate on this one? libsystemd-login should be mostly
This error occurs while building dbus with systemd support like below
$ make
make
44 matches
Mail list logo
