Re: [systemd-devel] cryptsetup vs. swapon/fsck (some kind of race condition)

On 16/05/14 16:31, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 16.05.14 03:20, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote: > "Minimal" configurations? Are you kidding? > > If you want something "minimal", then just use devtmpfs, and don't > involve userspace at all in creating device nodes. This is not a

Re: [systemd-devel] Unit swap.target & Unit boot.mount has failed.

This is one solution. Déjà vu. systemd-212-13.git8891f69.20140518.fc21.x86_64 /etc/dracut.conf.d/omit_dracut-module-systemd.conf # dracut modules to omit omit_dracutmodules+=" systemd " # dracut --kver 3.15.0-0.rc5.git2.9.fc21.x86_64 -vf Executing: /sbin/dracut --kver 3.15.0-0.rc5.git2.9.fc21.x

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Fix a few compiler warnings

--- src/journal/test-journal-stream.c | 2 +- src/libsystemd/sd-login/sd-login.c | 2 +- src/shared/util.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/journal/test-journal-stream.c b/src/journal/test-journal-stream.c index 8e1d08d..4f56edb 100644

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] core/cryptsetup: Add WantsMountFor option to enable fallback to password request for crypt mounts.

Combined into one ptach. I see it is not clear how this patch is related to the cryptsetup password timeout. Note the cryptsetup timeout is done by the cryptsetup service. Thus it will occur only if the cryptsetup is reached and the key is not valid. But that is true only for the key file on ac

Re: [systemd-devel] timed out waiting for device dev-disk-by\x2duuid

On May 17, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > No, the system definitely does not attempt to mount it if there's a missing > device. Systemd never executes /bin/mount at all in that case. A prerequisite > for the mount attempt is this line: > > [1.621517] localhost.localdomain syste

Re: [systemd-devel] Unable to override systemd-udevd.service

В Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:07:37 +0200 David Gstir пишет: > [Resend to mailing list, because my client somehow swallowed half the Cc > fields - sorry about that.] > > Hi! > > I encountered the same issue, running version 195-13.45.1 from opensuse in a > container: > > On 23.04.2014, at 19:26, And

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-notify --ready is not reliable

On Thu, 24.04.14 23:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:50:34PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 23.04.14 15:15, Eelco Dolstra (eelco.dols...@logicblox.com) wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've noticed that the command "syst

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] analyze: read host and system information from remote

On Wed, 23.04.14 23:03, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote: > This makes "systemd-analyze plot" read host information from remote. > > While we are it show if this is a virtualized system. > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76498 Merged both patches! Sorry for the delay! T

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] build: Honour SUID_CFLAGS and SUID_LDFLAGS

On Sun, 18.05.14 11:47, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote: > OK, Let's try the attached patch instead. Thanks, applied! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http:/

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] core: Filter by state behind the D-Bus API, not in the systemctl client.

On Mon, 28.04.14 12:08, da...@davidstrauss.net (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote: > From: David Strauss Thanks! Applied! (I do wonder though whether we should try harder to keep the client tools compatible with the server side, so that systemctl -M and systemctl -H continue to work, when server an

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] build: Honour SUID_CFLAGS and SUID_LDFLAGS

El 18/05/14 06:47, Lennart Poettering escribió: > On Sat, 17.05.14 12:39, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote: > >> This is the standard* way used to pass special linker/compiler >> flags such as -fPIE and -pie >> >> * "Standard" in the sense it is understood by many other >> packa

Re: [systemd-devel] Spelling fix: privilege

On Sun, 18.05.14 15:49, Nis Martensen (nis.marten...@web.de) wrote: > The spelling police is on guard :) > > Patch attached. Thanks! Applied! > >From 935238b9af1580464b95021a2bddc55036984546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Nis Martensen > Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 15:43:18 +0200 > Subject: [PATC

[systemd-devel] Spelling fix: privilege

The spelling police is on guard :) Patch attached. >From 935238b9af1580464b95021a2bddc55036984546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nis Martensen Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 15:43:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fix spelling of privilege --- NEWS |2 +- README

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] build: Honour SUID_CFLAGS and SUID_LDFLAGS

On Sat, 17.05.14 12:39, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote: > This is the standard* way used to pass special linker/compiler > flags such as -fPIE and -pie > > * "Standard" in the sense it is understood by many other > packages and commonly used by distributions. I really don't

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] build: Honour SUID_CFLAGS and SUID_LDFLAGS

Am 17.05.2014 22:02, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez: > El 17/05/14 14:56, Dave Reisner escribió: >> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:39:47PM -0400, Cristian Rodríguez >> wrote: >>> This is the standard* way used to pass special linker/compiler >>> flags such as -fPIE and -pie >>> >>> * "Standard" in the s

[systemd-devel] Unit swap.target & Unit boot.mount has failed.

Unit swap.target & Unit boot.mount has failed. systemd-212-12.git342aea1.20140517.fc21.x86_64 # journalctl ... [0.00] kernel: Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.15.0-0.rc5.git2.9.fc21.x86_64 root=UUID=... debug initrd=/initramfs-3.15.0-0.rc5.git2.9.fc21.x86_64.img ... [1.68

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: note that entire sections can now be ignored

Applied. Thanks! -t On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Michael Marineau wrote: > Prefixing a section name with "X-" will cause it and all of its contents > to be silently ignored as of commit 342aea19. > --- > man/systemd.unit.xml | 10 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)