Lennart Poettering composed on 2015-04-16 12:16 (UTC+0200):
Felix Miata wrote:
Zbigniew JÄdrzejewski-Szmek composed on 2015-04-15 18:11 (UTC):
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 13:31:38 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
This isn't the first time or the only system. This particular one is an
old
Lennart Poettering composed on 2015-04-16 12:32 (UTC+0200):
Felix Miata wrote:
Needing again to CAD on yet another machine (kt88b this time, kt400 earlier),
again encountering / going into RO state, I noticed this time the message
Ctrl-Alt-Del was pressed more than 7 times within 2s,
Lennart Poettering composed on 2015-04-16 12:40 (UTC+0200):
Felix Miata wrote:
I asked the following on freedesktop list a month ago and got no response. As
there was quite some time between this showing up in Fedora and Tumbleweed,
and Tumbleweed only lately upgraded systemd from 210 to
On Fri, 17.04.15 02:25, Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) wrote:
Lennart Poettering composed on 2015-04-16 12:16 (UTC+0200):
Felix Miata wrote:
Zbigniew JÄdrzejewski-Szmek composed on 2015-04-15 18:11 (UTC):
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 13:31:38 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
This
On 16/04/15 15:52, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
(I really think this dichotomy
needs to be removed, *especially* since it looks like code already
exists to try to use both metadata sources. This seems like it's just
asking for security screw-ups.)
Would it address this concern if there was an
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Groups *suck* as authentication scheme. If you add one group for each
privilege you want, then you'll have a huge number of groups, and
that's hardly desirable. It's pretty close to being unmanagable with
On Thu, 16.04.15 12:45, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net
wrote:
The ratio of complexity of capability code the kdbus folks have
already
On Thu, 16.04.15 12:30, Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net) wrote:
systemd itself checks CAP_SYS_KILL for clients asking to kill
arbitrary services (which means invoking kill() to all PIDs in the
service's cgroup).
Similar to this, logind checks CAP_SYS_KILL for clients asking to kill
Lennart Poettering wrote
We write the status output to /dev/console, see status_vprintf():
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/shared/terminal-util.c#n643
Usually the kernel will forward what is written to /dev/console to all
console= terminals listed on the kernel
Hi All,
Here is v4 of my pointstick set.
Changes since v3:
-Use the existing evdev matching rules
-Make setting the sensitivity part of the evdev builtin (which is called
keyboard for historical reasons)
Changes since v2:
-Fix numerous spelling / gramatical errors in commit messages
-Add a
The pointingstick of the Dell Latitude E6400 is somewhat slow by default,
whereas the pointingstick of the Dell Latitude D620 is much too fast by
default, set POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL for both of them to adjust for this.
---
hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb | 12
1 file changed, 12
There is quite a wide spread in the delta events generated by pointingsticks,
some generate deltas of 1-2 under normal use, while others generate deltas
from 1-20.
This commit adds a hwdb file which allows specifying a per model
POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL value which can be used by the userspace
Lenovo has changed the sensitivity of the trackpoint on the x240 / T440s / T540
generation of Thinkpads, making them somewhat insensitive by default, add a
hwdb entry to tweak the sensitivity setting.
The ThinkPad X200s is way way too slow by default and unless you push the
trackpoint quite hard
IBM / Lenovo trackpoints allow specifying a sensitivity setting through a
ps/2 command, which changes the range of the deltas sent when using the
trackpoint.
On some models with normal usage only deltas of 1 or 2 are send, resulting in
there only being 2 mouse cursor movement speeds, rather than
Hi,
I'm writing to see whether there's a best way to allow systemd to inherit
ownership of a process forked from a hand-crafted /sbin/init process before
that hand-crafted process turns over the keys to systemd by doing
exec(/lib/systemd/systemd) over the top of itself and allowing it to take
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:30:28PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
[...]
AFAICT this piece of kdbus code serves to enable a rather odd way to
write privilege-separated services to change the time and
On Fri, 17.04.15 03:29, Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) wrote:
When you see this message, then systemd will not bother with shuttding
down daemons cleanly anymore. However, it will still unmount all file
systems and sync things do disk. It will also pass control back to the
initrd,
On Fri, 17.04.15 15:54, Praveen kumar R (praveenrgo...@gmail.com) wrote:
I have a token passed on by command line argument on which I need to decide
to start the serial
On which command line? Kernel command line? What kind of token?
console or not. I plan to tweak the getty*ttyS0.service and
Hi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Daniel Drake dr...@endlessm.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:13 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice catch!
There's indeed a small race between handling inotify and queuing up
the change-event. We need to re-loop there. One day we
I have a token passed on by command line argument on which I need to decide
to start the serial
console or not. I plan to tweak the getty*ttyS0.service and add the script
which validates the token
and starts the console.
Is this the right approach or is there any better way of handling it ??
On Thu, 16.04.15 12:52, Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com) wrote:
It's easy to construct similar examples, for example for timedated,
where setting the system clock is subject to CAP_SYS_TIME, exactly
like the underlying system call. Using timedated instead of the system
call gives
On Fri, 17.04.15 13:57, Frank Steiner (fsteiner-ma...@bio.ifi.lmu.de) wrote:
Lennart Poettering wrote
We write the status output to /dev/console, see status_vprintf():
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/shared/terminal-util.c#n643
Usually the kernel will forward
On Fri, 17.04.15 09:00, Matt Hoosier (matt.hoos...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing to see whether there's a best way to allow systemd to inherit
ownership of a process forked from a hand-crafted /sbin/init process before
that hand-crafted process turns over the keys to systemd by doing
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 00:07 +0200, Stefan Tatschner wrote:
On Di, 2015-04-14 at 21:56 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
Failed to get machine PTY: Message did not receive a reply (timeout
by message bus)
I get a notification on the machine itself that it started container
getty and then
Hello all,
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2015-04-16 23:42 +]:
Hm, I'd go even further and add a check:
if (arg_offset arg_type != NULL arg_type != CRYPT_PLAIN)
log_warning(offset= ignored with type %s, arg_type);
if (arg_skip arg_type != NULL arg_type != CRYPT_PLAIN)
On Apr 17, 2015 4:53 AM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:30:28PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
[...]
AFAICT this piece of kdbus code serves to enable a rather
On Apr 17, 2015 5:42 AM, Simon McVittie
simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On 16/04/15 15:52, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
(I really think this dichotomy
needs to be removed, *especially* since it looks like code already
exists to try to use both metadata sources. This seems like it's just
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:00:49AM -0500, Matt Hoosier wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing to see whether there's a best way to allow systemd to inherit
ownership of a process forked from a hand-crafted /sbin/init process before
that hand-crafted process turns over the keys to systemd by doing
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:23:45PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Now, to put together a more complex scenario for you: consider a small
web UI that can be used to set the system time. It should realy run at
minimal privileges, after all it has a surface to the web. Hence you
write it as
Hi
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:23:45PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Now, to put together a more complex scenario for you: consider a small
web UI that can be used to set the system time. It should realy run at
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 04:19:47PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
Am 2015-02-16 14:16, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 16.02.15 14:13, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
Not quite. While you can use drop-in snippets to amend
orderings/depends, it's (unfortunately) not possible to
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 06:00:04PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:23:45PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Now, to put together a more complex scenario for you: consider a small
web UI
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
On Fri, 17.04.15 09:00, Matt Hoosier (matt.hoos...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing to see whether there's a best way to allow systemd to
inherit
ownership of a process forked from a hand-crafted
Hi,
I'm investigating why systemctl stop gdm; Xorg usually fails. The
new X process complains that X is still running.
Here's what I think is happening:
1. systemd sends SIGTERM to gdm to stop the service
2. gdm exits - it has a simple SIGTERM handler which just quits the
mainloop without
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Matt Hoosier matt.hoos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 17.04.15 09:00, Matt Hoosier (matt.hoos...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing to see whether there's a best way to allow
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 18:40 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 00:07 +0200, Stefan Tatschner wrote:
On Di, 2015-04-14 at 21:56 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
Failed to get machine PTY: Message did not receive a reply (timeout
by message bus)
I get a notification on
On Apr 17, 2015 6:05 AM, Cristian Rodríguez crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Groups *suck* as authentication scheme. If you add one group for each
privilege you want, then you'll have a huge number of groups,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Matt Hoosier matt.hoos...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 17.04.15 09:00, Matt Hoosier
--text follows this line--
Hi,
I am having trouble with socket-activated containers, where the socket
is first opened outside the container, on an interface/IP address that
is then passed in to the container.
In short, when I try to ssh to the IP address of the container, the
container is
39 matches
Mail list logo
