... would be nice if someone could add a systemd-networkd section to
Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
Looks like all methods but systemd-networkd are covered.
Regards,
Brian
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:06 PM Brian Hutchinson
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:06 AM Brian Hutchinson
>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:06 AM Brian Hutchinson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:16 AM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
>> While I can't comment on the specifics of configuring systemd-networkd
>> to use ports through DSA (although the linked GitHub issue shows that
>> it can be done), I really d
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 13:09:43 +0200, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
> Ok, so for instance, on my debian, when I see:
>
> > user@1000.service
> │ │ ├─gvfs-goa-volume-monitor.service
> │ │ │ └─1480 /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-goa-volume-monitor
> │ │ ├─gvfs-daemon.service
> │ │ │ ├─1323 /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd
>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:06 AM Brian Hutchinson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:16 AM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
>> While I can't comment on the specifics of configuring systemd-networkd
>> to use ports through DSA (although the linked GitHub issue shows that
>> it can be done), I really d
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:16 AM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> While I can't comment on the specifics of configuring systemd-networkd
> to use ports through DSA (although the linked GitHub issue shows that
> it can be done), I really doubt you are going to be able to
> successfully bond any group of s
While I can't comment on the specifics of configuring systemd-networkd
to use ports through DSA (although the linked GitHub issue shows that
it can be done), I really doubt you are going to be able to
successfully bond any group of such ports, because they all have the
same MAC address. In your pro
Hi,
I have my device tree exposing two Microchip KSZ9567 switch ports. I need
to use them as individual NIC's.
I've tested the DSA driver as individual nics and they work fine. I do
this with:
ip addr add 192.168.0.4/24 dev lan1
ip addr add 192.168.2.4/24 dev lan2
ip link set eth0 up
ip link
Hello, thanks again for your answer (and for your patience ;-))
On 12/10/2020 19:48, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
Yes, but it is *not* a top level for *all* of the user's processes –
just for those that are managed through systemctl --user.
Ok, so for instance, on my debian, when I see:
user@100
