On 05/27/2016 09:43 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2016-05-27 17:14 GMT+02:00 Chris Friesen :
And the annoying thing is that if I turn off the new naming scheme there
seems to be less determinism than there used to be. I assume this is due to
the effort to extract more parallelism at boot, but it&#
On 05/27/2016 08:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 26.05.16 12:28, Chris Friesen (cbf...@mail.usask.ca) wrote:
So I've been playing with this a bit, but I've run into another snag. It
seems that on initial boot even with "net.ifnames=0" the ethernet interface
order
On 05/26/2016 01:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 01:49:07PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
The thing that makes this all confusing/annoying is that when I was using a
homebrew distro with a 3.10 kernel and sysV init the interface ordering was
completely repeatable on identical
On 05/26/2016 12:41 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Chris Friesen [2016-05-26 12:28 -0600]:
So I've been playing with this a bit, but I've run into another snag. It
seems that on initial boot even with "net.ifnames=0" the ethernet interface
ordering isn't consistent.
On 05/13/2016 08:54 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 05/13/2016 01:23 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 12.05.16 12:34, Chris Friesen (cbf...@mail.usask.ca) wrote:
I booted the kernel with "net.ifnames=0", which worked to turn off the
location-based naming.
I then created a set of
On 05/13/2016 01:23 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 12.05.16 12:34, Chris Friesen (cbf...@mail.usask.ca) wrote:
I booted the kernel with "net.ifnames=0", which worked to turn off the
location-based naming.
I then created a set of files, one per eth device that match based on M
On 05/12/2016 01:27 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 05/12/2016 12:50 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2016 18:28, "Chris Friesen" mailto:cbf...@mail.usask.ca>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone point me to the commit that removed s
On 05/12/2016 12:50 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2016 18:28, "Chris Friesen" mailto:cbf...@mail.usask.ca>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone point me to the commit that removed support for assigning
"ethX" names ba
On 05/12/2016 11:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 12.05.16 11:20, Chris Friesen (cbf...@mail.usask.ca) wrote:
Hi,
Could someone point me to the commit that removed support for assigning
"ethX" names based on MAC addresses?
Alternately, can someone suggest a way to get
On 05/12/2016 11:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.05.2016 um 19:20 schrieb Chris Friesen:
Could someone point me to the commit that removed support for assigning
"ethX" names based on MAC addresses?
Alternately, can someone suggest a way to get equivalent behaviour (the
ability to
Hi,
Could someone point me to the commit that removed support for assigning "ethX"
names based on MAC addresses?
Alternately, can someone suggest a way to get equivalent behaviour (the ability
to set "ethX" names based on MAC address) using the current infrastructure?
(Preferably as of RHEL
11 matches
Mail list logo
