Hi,
On Thu, 2025-08-14 at 10:29 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Just trying to update a few containers from Rocky 9 to 10 and there
> appears to be no systemd-networkd package any more.
>
> Googling can't find anything to suggest it's specific removal but
> also
> no one really complaining about
Hi,
On Wed, 2025-08-13 at 09:46 +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 8:22 AM Andrei Borzenkov
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 11:59 AM Silvio Knizek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, dem 12.08.2025 um 11:02 +0300 schrieb Andrei
> > > Borzenkov:
> > >
> > > I spent som
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:47 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Fr, 24.01.25 12:22, David White (dr.white...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have a stupid question about building systemd.
> >
> > I need a particular package rebuilt to test some changes. I only nee
zstd.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzstd.so.1 (0x7b16cff42000)
libpcre2-8.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-8.so.0
(0x7b16cfea5000)
libudev.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libudev.so.1 (0x7b16cfe6)
Thanks,
David.
S_DIRECTORY}/cryptsetup.pkcs11-pin)"'
ExecStartPre=/bin/bash -c 'echo "PINFILE HERE: $PINFILE"'
ExecStart=
ExecStart=/bin/bash -c "PIN=$(cat $PINFILE) /usr/bin/systemd-cryptsetup
attach os_crypt /dev/disk/by-uuid/c7dad40e-973a-4381-9bcb-6c4477429f95 none
luks,pkcs
LoadCredential=cryptsetup.pkcs11-pin:/path/to/unix/socket
Would that work? If not, how would I go about passing a pkcs11 pin to
cryptsetup.
I know I can manually do it like this:
PIN=4321 systemd-cryptsetup attach os-crypt /dev/sdb - pkcs11-uri=auto but
I want to use the generator with crypttab.
Thanks,
David.
Hi Andrei,
Thanks a lot, it worked! Sorry I didn't get it the first time.
David
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 8:05 AM David Elie-Dit-Cosaque
wrote:
> > That is what I told you already.
> >
> > mkdir /etc/systemd/system/crio-.scope.d
> > echo "[Unit]" > /e
> That is what I told you already.
>
> mkdir /etc/systemd/system/crio-.scope.d
> echo "[Unit]" > /etc/systemd/system/crio-.scope.d/order.conf
> echo "Before=myscript.service" >>
> /etc/systemd/system/crio-.scope.d/order.conf
Ah I see, I did not under
Type=oneshot
RemainAfterExit=true
ExecStop=/usr/local/bin/myscript.sh
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Is there a way to use wildcards in After= like After=*.scope or something
equivalent. I cannot hardcode the .scope names because they are random.
Thanks!
David
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 8:27 AM
Hi Dan and Andrei, thanks a lot for the explanation and code snippets, I
try it out.
Thanks,
David.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 10:13 AM Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 3:16 PM David Elie-Dit-Cosaque
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to creat
-before-shutdown
which seems to work, except I could not find any ways to control the
ordering/dependencies. I'll try again as you suggest,
Thanks,
David.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 5:45 PM Nils Kattenbeck wrote:
> You should probably just use an ExecStart= (not with the stop you are
> curr
]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
The script does run after shutdown is initiated but since it relies on
other services which are also shutting down, it fails. Is there a way to
order the shutdown so that myscript.sh is completed first before
continuing with the shutdown?
Thanks!
David.
lation did something that is causing systemd to start
a session, but not close it.
How can I get these 2 processes to shutdown?
Is this an issue with systemd or in the configuration of Chrome?
Trying to learn to be a better system admin,
David
*1 -
https://www.admin-magazine.com/Arch
xample?
Thanks,
--
Valentin David
m...@valentindavid.com
Systemd crashed on me the other day. I was writing up some Systemd units
and testing them out by daemon-reload every time I wanted to test them
out. Not the best way to go on about, I know. My bad abusing Systemd to
the point of crashing. Perhaps it was just a bit flip that caused this.
sys
flatpak to provide /run/udev/data to containers?
(Also, snapd does it, oops)
--
Valentin David
m...@valentindavid.com
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 11:09 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mo, 05.06.23 10:41, Valentin David (valentin.da...@canonical.com)
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 9:56 AM Lennart Poettering <
> lenn...@poettering.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On So
I think that behavior was introduced by
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/48a09a8fff480aab9a68e95e95cc37f6b1438751
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:41 AM Valentin David
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 9:56 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
>> On So, 04.06.23
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 9:56 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On So, 04.06.23 14:25, Valentin David (valentin.da...@canonical.com)
> wrote:
>
> > I have been trying to create a root partition from initrd with
> > systemd-repart. The repart.d file for this partition is as follo
I have been trying to create a root partition from initrd with
systemd-repart. The repart.d file for this partition is as follow:
[Partition]
Type=root
Label=root
Encrypt=tpm2
Format=ext4
FactoryReset=yes
I am just using systemd-repart.service in initrd, without modification
(that is, it finds th
does this work if
Storage=volatile or Storage=none? Is a multiplication factor still applied? If
yes, then what "free disk space" is considered?
Thanks,
David Chamberlain
@.service units have "DefaultDependencies=no"
and no conflict on shutdown. Maybe this is missing then. "cryptsetup
attach" might be running.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:34 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Do, 05.01.23 14:18, Valentin David (valentin.da...@canonical.com)
> wrot
Hello,
In Ubuntu Core, we have some mounts that cannot be unmounted until we have
switched root.
To simplify, this looks like that:
/ mounts a ro loop devices backed by /some/disk/some/path/image.img
/some/disk mounts a block device (let's say /dev/some-block0p1)
In this case, /some/disk cannot
Yeah, so far we (tailscale) haven't found a good way to run on the Steam Deck
at bootup, and also survive the A/B OS updates. Systemd system extensions _can_
be activated during bootup, if you place the extension in one of the well-known
locations (/var/lib/extensions would be the one to use on
to change its
ordering behavior during shutdown.
Does this ring any bells?
Thank you!
Best regards,
David Gubler
--
David Gubler
System Engineer
VSHN AG | Neugasse 10 | CH-8005 Zürich
+41 44 545 53 00 | https://vshn.ch
l-session.target
David
y, or only issuing it once every few hundred detections?
Or if the problem is a client side problem is it possible to ID what it is and
get debian-transmission to fix their code?
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: Michael Biebl [mailto:mbi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 October 2020 15:05
T
mechanism similar to that
available in rsyslogd?
David
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: 19 October 2020 14:57
To: David C. Partridge
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Suppressing spam error messages in the s
is using DNS
that's triggering this?
Thanks
David
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
20 at 03:08, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Do, 06.08.20 13:59, David Cunningham (dcunning...@voisonics.com) wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm developing a service called product_routed which is managed by
> systemd.
> > The service can normally be stopped with "ser
duct/current/bin/routed
PIDFile=/var/run/product/routed.pid
Restart=on-abnormal
RestartSec=1
LimitSTACK=infinity
LimitNOFILE=65535
LimitNPROC=65535
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
--
David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
http://voisonics.com/
USA: +1 213 221 1092
New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:00 AM David J wrote:
Hello!
This is in regards to sd-bus function "sd_bus_open_system", where Valgrind
reports possible memory leak. See the following code:
mem_test.c:
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
sd_bus *bus = NULL
n 0 blocks
The question is am I doing anything wrong here? Why Valgrind thinks there "might" be
memory leak? The interesting part is if I use "sd_bus_open_system", Valgrind is all happy
and no warnings at all!
Thank you,
David J.
__
AM, Giacinto Cifelli wrote:
>
> hi Lennart,
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 2:14 PM Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Do, 09.04.20 14:12, David J (ema...@icloud.com) wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Systemd developers!
>>>
>>>
x27;", callback, userdata2);
>
> r = sd_event_loop(event);
> assert(r >= 0);
>
> bus = sd_bus_flush_close_unref(bus);
> slot = sd_bus_slot_unref(slot);
> event = sd_event_unref(event);
> }
>
> /*End =*/
>
> I appreciate your help and your time.
>
> Thank you,
> David J (ema...@icloud.com)
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
userdata2);
r = sd_event_loop(event);
assert(r >= 0);
bus = sd_bus_flush_close_unref(bus);
slot = sd_bus_slot_unref(slot);
event = sd_event_unref(event);
}
/*End =*/
I appreciate your help and your time.
Thank you,
David J (
Note that Debian 8 is very old. It runs systemd v215, which came out
in 2014. So, from upstream's perspective, unless it's a well-known
bug, the answer is probably "who knows? Use a more recent systemd."
I suggest filing a bug with Debian and asking them for help. Debian 8
is still supported for a
Did you `systemctl enable rsync-Saruman.timer` to activate the timer?
Timers can be enabled and disabled just like services, you need to enable
it after creating.
- Dave
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 8:05 PM Kenneth Porter
wrote:
> I've created my service timer with the following:
>
> [Timer]
> # wai
Hi! This is the wrong list for your question. You should ask this on the
help list for your linux distro, it looks like they've configured Docker
incorrectly, or there's some extra required setup that you're missing. You
can also consult `journalctl -u docker.service` to find clues on why Docker
wo
I could be missing something, but I think there's a gap in the
functionality for timers for periodic tasks on battery-powered devices.
Basically, I want to generate a security report (SCAP style) approximately
weekly but avoid doing so on battery.
Here's what I've tried or looked at:
- If I use C
Signed-off-by: "David R. Piegdon"
systemd allows use of predictable netdev names. these currently do
not work for netdevs connected to USB platform busses, as the id
of the platform bus is not necessarily consistent across kernel
versions. this patch allows setting a suggested
been defined!
In the current master there are a few platforms that contain such
aliases, e.g. am33xx, dm814x or imx6qdl
Yours,
David
David R. Piegdon (2):
usb core: dts: allow suggesting usb bus number for platform busses
dt-bindings: allow suggesting usb bus number for usb platform b
Signed-off-by: "David R. Piegdon"
systemd allows use of predictable netdev names. these currently do
not work for netdevs connected to USB platform busses, as the id
of the platform bus is not necessarily consistent across kernel
versions. this patch allows setting a suggested
The practice will continue, however; TravisCI, CircleCI, and my own
GopherCI all have mechanisms for providing e.g a GITHUB_PASSWORD
environment variable for automated build publishing. No shock that a DevOps
engineer might make the mistake of applying the same principle with system
o reason for these non-privileged
users to have access to that, anyway.
Thanks for giving this some thought.
Regards,
-David
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:17 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Di, 13.11.18 07:49, David Parsley (pars...@linuxjedi.org) wrote:
>
> > I disagree; privacy of e
;m going to go ahead and update the Ansible role to
operate that way.
Regards,
-David
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:18 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mo, 12.11.18 17:41, aleivag (alei...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > You can define those secrets on /etc/robotsecret.txt, and then on your
> uni
els
operation of the dockerized version.
So, anybody know what API calls an unprivileged user can make to get that
information from the unit file? It'd be nice to test before and after to
make sure the measure is effective.
Regards,
-David
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:23 PM aleivag wrote:
>
dbus-daemon on
server systems?
Thanks,
-David
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
uld
just work.
Please let me know if I'm wrong, and otherwise - thanks for being my rubber
ducks!
- Dave
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:02 AM David Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm exploring systemd-boot and secure booting for an Arch Linux install.
> To get secure boot working
Hi,
I'm exploring systemd-boot and secure booting for an Arch Linux install. To
get secure boot working right, I need to build a unified kernel image that
I can sign. However, I also need to pass 2 initrd images into the boot
process (one for CPU microcode, and the proper OS iniramfs).
But, AFAIC
sage 1
Log message 2
Date corrected to be 2018:
Log message 3
Log message 1
Log message 2
Typically this is not how we want our log to behave. Is there any way to
show the log in sequential order?
Kind regards, David Weinehall
___
systemd-devel mailin
On 11/1/17, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:49 AM, David Henderson
> wrote:
>> On 11/1/17, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, David Henderson wrote:
>>>> Is there a place to just get the udev code instead of all of syst
On 11/1/17, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, David Henderson wrote:
>> Is there a place to just get the udev code instead of all of systemD?
>
> No.
>
>> I tried looking online, but it appears that the only solo versions are
>> old. I gues
On 11/1/17, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:04:19AM -0400, David Henderson wrote:
>> Good morning Lennart, thanks for the follow-up! At this point I am
>> only interested in building a particular program (udev) from the
>> systemD collection, not help building a
On 11/1/17, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 31.10.17 14:49, David Henderson (dhender...@digital-pipe.com) wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon all. So is there another place I can get help for
>> this problem?
>
> Sorry, but this isn't really the right forum for h
Good afternoon all. So is there another place I can get help for this problem?
Thanks,
Dave
On 10/30/17, David Henderson wrote:
> Good morning all! Just following up with this!
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
>
> On 10/26/17, David Henderson wrote:
>> On 10/26/17, David He
Good morning all! Just following up with this!
Thanks,
Dave
On 10/26/17, David Henderson wrote:
> On 10/26/17, David Henderson wrote:
>> So I am using the compile flags as suggested, however, I have noticed
>> two errors. I tried passing '--enable-static' to '
On 10/26/17, David Henderson wrote:
> So I am using the compile flags as suggested, however, I have noticed
> two errors. I tried passing '--enable-static' to 'configure' and end
> up with:
>
> checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
> chec
So I am using the compile flags as suggested, however, I have noticed
two errors. I tried passing '--enable-static' to 'configure' and end
up with:
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries...
On 10/26/17, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 18:26 David Henderson
> wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon all! I have been looking for the udev source code to
>> compile the library and utilities and it appears it is bundled in the
>> systemd software. I have r
simple as:
builder -n udev -a i64
Dave
On 10/26/17, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 18:26 David Henderson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Good afternoon all! I have been looking for the udev source
Good afternoon all! I have been looking for the udev source code to
compile the library and utilities and it appears it is bundled in the
systemd software. I have run autoreconf to generate a configure
script (using version 233 since I don't have meson), but could not see
a way to just compile th
This is the first public release of dbus-broker.
Git Tag: v3
Archive:
https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/archive/v3/dbus-broker-v3.tar.gz
The dbus-broker project is an implementation of a message bus as
defined by the D-Bus specification. Its aim is to provide high
performance and relia
> Fixed here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=commit;h=c48149cf80c6582c2369bc7f8a33d794021d9dae
Looks good and works for me - thanks Peter.
Cheers, David
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Thanks for the feedback, Lennart...
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:38:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 05.07.17 13:01, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
>
> > Ceph relies on by-partuuid symlinks, in order to locate the journal
> > partition from a given OSD part
Ceph relies on by-partuuid symlinks, in order to locate the journal
partition from a given OSD partition. For details, see
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19489.
---
rules/60-persistent-storage.rules | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rul
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:47:24AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 07:45 +0000, David Härdeman wrote:
>> April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote:
>>>
>>> It's not clear that the GNOME side was implemented correctly yet
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:21:19PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:45AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>>No, it does not. sd-bus was inconsistent. See, there are 3 things
>>involved in the Object-Manager:
>>
>>Signal: InterfacesAdded
>>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:45AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
>>> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces
>>> reported at al
Hey
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 25.04.17 09:54, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces
>> >> reported at all times. The GetManagedObjects() ca
April 25, 2017 9:54 AM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>
>> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>>
>&g
Hi
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>> On Thu,
April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 16:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>>>> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces
>>
April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> I'm implementing
April 24, 2017 4:51 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
> On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces reported by
>> sd-bus should match what gdbus does? (assuming, of course, that gd
Hi
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>>On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectM
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager using the
>> sd-bus API and there seems to be some differences between ho
Hey
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager using the
> sd-bus API and there seems to be some differences between how gdbus and
> sd-bus implements the API.
>
> I implemented a simple O
at gdbus does? (assuming, of course, that gdbus
can be considered the "reference" implementation).
Regards,
David
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Hi
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Manuel Reimer
wrote:
> On 03/25/2017 05:16 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So far I did this by creating an empty file with the same name in
>>>> /etc/udev/rules.d which works well, but for no reason the name was
>
I did this by creating an empty file with the same name in
>> /etc/udev/rules.d which works well, but for no reason the name was
>> changed some time ago which overrides my empty file and reactivates
>> the problematic rule.
> That's the only way. Tags cannot be unset.
> But I don't want to wait for those services to shutdown.
Then there's no reason to interact with systemd if you want to force an
immediate, unclean reboot. You just want something like the reboot syscall
with LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART.
___
systemd-devel
This failure is not from systemd; systemd is only the messenger:
> Mar 07 11:08:09 3CX systemd[1]: 3CXPhoneSystemMC01.service start
operation timed out. Terminating.
Someone needs to troubleshoot why 3CXPhoneSystemMC01.service is hanging
when it tries to start, and this list can't answer that. Yo
s.
>
> BTW, since the implementation seems to think the data is unreliable,
> perhaps it would be prudent to say so in hostnamectl documentation, so
> the consumers of the data might be more thoughtful about what to use it
> for?
Turned into a github PR [1]. Can we continue the discus
nd systemd
> are supposed to fit together in the future.
>
> If I understood David correctly, bus1 is not meant as a drop-in
> replacement for dbus-daemon, but rather provide some simpler, lower
> level communication primitives.
Yes!
> In an earlier talk by Lennart, he mentioned
For what it's worth, I try to encourage projects to identify their bindings
as simply for systemd, even if the journal support is the first (and only)
set of APIs available. It's just so easy to support the other APIs once the
journal is already supported, and daemons that want to use the journal
s
you break bsearch() and
lookup performance would drop.
A much easier solution would be to use multiple virtual tries: Prefix
your generic matches with "test-generic:*foobar*" and your specific
ones with "test-specific:*foobar*" and then always lookup both. This
obviously only works if the number of levels is static.
As a hack, I think you can use "**", "***", ... to change the ordering
to your needs.
We could also say each hwdb-source gets its own virtual trie and
they're searched in alphabetical order. This would break ABI, but
would make it a lot more powerful.
Not sure. Maybe Kay has some comments?
David
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016, 19:07 Kai Hendry wrote:
> I would love to see that 10 lines of shell you claimed, but I think you
> might be underestimating the fine work that went into Dokku!
>
It's not so much underestimating the work in Dokku as much as leveraging
what systemd and a tool like haproxy p
Dokku would be about a 5-10 lines of shell script with services running in
systemd.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016, 20:41 Kai Hendry wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016, at 07:56 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Is that possible by just using systemd, or is a load balancer like
> > HAProxy or a special NGINX configura
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:07 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Ultimately it's really a design decision: tabular file formats have
> the benefit of being a lot more dense, but are neither particularly
> extensible nor self-explanatory (as you need to know what each column
> means). Unit files are a b
You either need a load balancer (less elegant) or need to make use of the
Linux kernel's SO_REUSEPORT option so the new application can bind to the
same port as the old one (at which point the old application should unbind
the port and shut itself down).
There could be a (potentially socket-activated) service that handles
requests for image downloads.
On Tue, May 31, 2016, 11:06 Brandon Philips wrote:
> Hello Everyone-
>
> The rkt container engine wants to run with different permissions pre-start
> and start. In pre-start it needs to fetch/downl
e it as is, as a seriously
safety-concerned service then just must not be allowed to use this
feature (by disabling NotifyAccess).
Viele Grüße,
David
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
=30s
Granting any possible change would diminish safety expected from a
watchdog mechanism. At least IMHO.
David
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
From: Bob Ham
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:58:12 +0100
> On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 15:46 -0700, Stefan Agner wrote:
>
>> Or in other words: Is this a Kernel or systemd issue?
>
> From what I recall, both; an issue with the FEC driver, and issues in
> systemd/udevd's handling of link-level settings.
T
From: Stefan Agner
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:46:08 -0700
> What is the expectation/definition when link configuration should be
> possible? Only after the network device got opened or before?
Only after it is open. Drivers almost always have the entire chip in
powerdown state when it is not ope
there is no way to remove tags with libudev. It also seems to be impossible
>> to set an ACL rule to deny access for everyone. Any other suggestions?
>
> There isn't any concept of ownership in udev, and I am pretty sure
> there shouln't be.
>
> input does know one h
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 1:36 PM Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> There's a third way:
>
> ExecStart=/usr/bin/strace -D -ff -o /tmp/myservice.trace
> /usr/bin/myservlce --foo
>
Do you know if that would pass through file descriptors for socket
activation?
___
Rebooting an old thread now that we're finally testing this out.
> "strace" should do the job. It should give you a pretty good idea of all
syscalls a process uses. That's what I used when testing SyscallFilters=.
This turns out to be less useful than it seems.
There are two major ways to invoke
stom-man.xsl line 27 element import
> xsl:import : unable to load
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
> Makefile:22089: recipe for target 'man/bootup.7' failed
Do you have the required stylesheets installed? In particular,
d
1 - 100 of 1237 matches
Mail list logo
