Hi, some time ago (about 3 years ago, first commit at Apr 9, 2014)
I created small project: systemd-swap.
https://github.com/Nefelim4ag/systemd-swap
Short description from README.md:
Script for manage swap on:
zswap - Enable/Configure
zram - Autoconfigurating
files - (sparse files for saving
parse get name of bdev from 10th column
Not tested while boot process, code in separate binary file working good.
From 97d259c38da3a32569e30bfaf7df56c062c570a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timofey Titovets
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:43:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Bootchart: use /proc/pid
2014-10-31 11:57 GMT+03:00 Karel Zak :
>
> somewhere in systemd code is mountinfo parser.. or see
> https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/blob/master/libmount/src/tab_parse.c#L124
>
> it seems you also want to read:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentati
2014-10-31 3:06 GMT+03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:45:53PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
>> Good time of day, list.
>> I have try to fix "Fixme" in svg.c:
>> /* FIXME: this works only in the simple case */
>>
>> By
v, &ptr[6], 3);
rootbdev[3] = '\0';
sprintf(filename, "block/%s/device/model", rootbdev);
fd = openat(sysfd, filename, O_RDONLY);
--
2.1.3
>From df889766a0dae0700cbc1378699e1abbad6b3f8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timofey
2014-10-29 16:20 GMT+03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:16:22PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
>> Why then developers use cmdline before?
>> Maybe cmdline allow determine disk when bootchart working from or in initrd?
> bootchart was merged into s
Why then developers use cmdline before?
Maybe cmdline allow determine disk when bootchart working from or in initrd?
2014-10-28 15:37 GMT+03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:56:32AM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
>> Good time of day, list.
>> I try to
ns.
From 4d14e78977df92e010ea488f97acd6a5e8e30e97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timofey Titovets
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:42:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Bootchart: allow parse LABEL, UUID, PARTUUID for svg info
---
src/bootchart/svg.c | 24
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletion
On 10/28/2014 03:45 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2014 at 03:30:13, Timofey Titovets wrote:
Good time of day, list.
I try to fix "Fixme" in svg.c:
/* FIXME: this works only in the simple case */
By default function try to get root=/dev/*
I write small function to
t can look more pretty.
May be i missed(reimplemented) some internal functional of systemd?
I also attach patch to email. Thanks.
From 896ef1c040a6395375e3adcd230bf2b766db633c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timofey Titovets
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:17:40 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Bootchart: allow p
when you send it inline!
>
> Lennart
>
> --
> Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
I attached it to the first message, well, this is not a problem, i
attach it again (below). =]
--
Have a nice day,
Timofey.
From 57b2655d2041d2bb2e9b25bef577ead9b27ce6ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timofey
2014-10-27 16:00 GMT+03:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Sun, 26.10.14 00:30, Timofey Titovets (nefelim...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Completed TODO: remove multi-seat-x
>
> Hmm, I don't remember the details of this, did X release a new version
> which makes this tool unnecess
Completed TODO: remove multi-seat-x
From 57b2655d2041d2bb2e9b25bef577ead9b27ce6ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timofey Titovets
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 00:17:24 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] login: remove multi-seat-x
---
Makefile.am | 14 --
TODO | 2
Good time of day list, i just want to hear your opinions - pro and con
Pre story:
Before i install bunch of systemd-{networkd,resolved} and
wpa_supplicant (for connecting to HotSpots)
After i spend some time to think about network handling by networkd
and resolved, about some cases and i have ide
Thanks for explanation, it thread can be closed.
2014-08-18 0:41 GMT+03:00 Dave Reisner :
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:25:00AM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
>> Good time of day, i just want to ask:
>> Systemd depend on util-linux mount command and in code we call him,
>>
Good time of day, i just want to ask:
Systemd depend on util-linux mount command and in code we call him,
may have a sense to import and cleanup code to systemd base, and just
call function in systemd, instead of using mount command?
But only benefit what i see:
it faster, when call external comma
2014-08-15 2:00 GMT+03:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Fri, 15.08.14 01:43, Timofey Titovets (nefelim...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> +int fail_if_symlink(const char *unit, const char* where) {
>> +assert(where);
>> +
>> +if (is_symlink(where) > 0
I just use:
./autogen.sh && ./configure && make
But did not matter, thanks for explanation, i think what this thread
can be closed.
2014-08-15 1:57 GMT+03:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Fri, 15.08.14 01:11, Timofey Titovets (nefelim...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Good
Just complete TODO:
* refuse mounting on symlinks
I not add this TODO, but i think what it avoid potential security
{and/or} bug issues
v2 -> v3:
Rebase on latest git
Add message : Mount on symlink not allowed.
if systemd try mounting entry from fstab on symlink, user get:
$ systemctl status
Good time of day, when i compile systemd i get ton of warning like:
may be used uninitialized in function...
May be i can spend some time and create patches with fixes of that warnings?
As example declare it by default to 0 or something like that.
Or this is not a bug, just feature? %)
--
Have
21.07.14 15:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:38:57AM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
>> > Just completed TODO:
>> > * readahead: use BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE instead of BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG
>>
>> This is
Okay, i will rebase and resend, and add warning
But what i must do with message:
"symlink.mount failed to run 'mount' task: Too many levels of symbolic links"?
Just leave and add additional massage error or replace?
2014-08-14 20:31 GMT+03:00 Timofey Titovets :
> Okay, i
Just completed TODO:
* readahead: use BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE instead of BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG
ioctl, with START_IO
commit d3fc81bd6a5a046b22600ac1204df220c93d2c15 refs/tags/v30
Author: Lennart Poettering
Date: Wed Jun 15 15:39:10 2011 +0200
update TODO
i no add this todo in TODO list (recur
Just complete TODO:
* refuse mounting on symlinks
I not add this TODO, but i think what it avoid potential security
{and/or} bug issues
if systemd try mounting entry from fstab on symlink, user get something
systemctl status symlink.mount
● symlink.mount - /symlink
Loaded: loaded (/etc/fs
Zbyszek, i research problem and i found what in btrfs.h
struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args not defined
This acceptable if i add it in missing.h like:
/* btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args now 21.07.2014
* not defined in btrfs.h and duplicated from /fs/btrfs/ctree.h
*/
#ifdef HAVE_LINUX_BTRFS_H
stru
2014-07-21 17:11 GMT+03:00 Lennart Poettering :
> That would follow our usual coding style very closely...
I know >_<, i do bad looking error codes >_<
Lennart, thanks for explanation, i will fix it and resend patch.
--
Best regards,
Timofey.
___
syste
Just completed TODO:
* refuse mounting on symlinks
I not add this TODO, but i think what it avoid potential
security{and/or} bug issues
If systemd try mounting entry from fstab on symlink, user get something
like that:
Jul 19 15:49:38 beplan.lan systemd[1]: Mounting /var/tmp/symlink...
Jul 1
Zbyszek, thanks for comment, i will work on fixing what you say and
resend patch.
>> Just completed TODO:
>> * readahead: use BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE instead of BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG
>
> This is still not an explanation. What is the difference between the
> two?
I can't explain it, because no i add thi
I resend patch as v2 with fixed todo
2014-07-21 9:16 GMT+03:00 Timofey Titovets :
> 2014-07-21 5:21 GMT+03:00 Andrey Borzenkov :
>> В Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:27:20 +0300
>> Timofey Titovets пишет:
>>
>>> Just completed TODO:
>>> * readahead: use BTRFS_IOC_D
Just completed TODO:
* readahead: use BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE instead of BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG
//i save BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG as fallback, because BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE
not working (as i know) on several old kernels
v1 -> v2
Fixed spelling in TODO
TODO | 1 -
src/rea
2014-07-21 5:21 GMT+03:00 Andrey Borzenkov :
> В Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:27:20 +0300
> Timofey Titovets пишет:
>
>> Just completed TODO:
>> * readahead: use BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE instead of BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG
>>
>
> It would be helpful to give explanation "why&q
Just completed TODO:
* readahead: use BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE instead of BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG
TODO | 1 -
src/readahead/readahead-collect.c | 22 +-
src/shared/missing.h | 15 +++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 dele
Just completed TODO:
* refuse mounting on symlinks
If systemd try mounting entry from fstab on symlink, user get something
like that:
Jul 19 15:49:38 beplan.lan systemd[1]: Mounting /var/tmp/lol1...
Jul 19 15:49:38 beplan.lan systemd[1]: var-tmp-lol1.mount Refuse mount
on symlink: Operation no
33 matches
Mail list logo
