Thanks for the link Brian. Very valuable.
Have you discussed moving
cntvct-log
to systemd-analyze? IMHO, systemd can have better control when the target is
reached to record the wall time.
Umut
From: systemd-devel on behalf of
Brian Masney
Date: Thursday, 26 September 2024 at 03:07
To: dha
onDirectory=
> yet - no reason it can't there be one, just someone needs to implement
> it. PRs welcome!
>
> On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 17:04 +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> > It indeed worked as squashfs image. Thanks for that.
> >
> &
-19 at 16:09 +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> > Hi Luca, have you had time to help me out or do you think you could
> > help me
> > out? Thanks in advance.
>
> Works fine for me with systemd 249.5:
>
> $ tar xf ~/Downloads/portable.tar
> $ mksquashfs base/
Thanks for your reply.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:49 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mi, 13.10.21 13:38, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com)
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, we have been playing around more with the portable services and
> > lots of loose thoughts came
Hi Luca, have you had time to help me out or do you think you could help me
out? Thanks in advance.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:56 PM Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Hi again. I tried renaming (
> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/os-release.html) it but
> that didn
ile/d/1LoN_swR7jgvo5yxajWjYK5ck_e8kJs1W/view?usp=sharing
there should be a download button on the top right. Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Umut
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:46 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 14:59 +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> > Thanks and I would have never figured it ou
15 at 12:18 +, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> > Hi, following works for us (for reference, configuration is printed
> > at the end)
> >
> > portablectl --now attach --extension=./stackupper ./base stackupper
> >
> > However, if we move the cat from base/
Hi, following works for us (for reference, configuration is printed at the end)
portablectl --now attach --extension=./stackupper ./base stackupper
However, if we move the cat from base/usr/bin/cat to stackupper/bin/cat it is
not working. Seems like we cannot include any library/executable in th
Hi, we have been playing around more with the portable services and lots of
loose thoughts came up. Hopefully we can initiate discussions.
The PrivateUsers and DynamicUsers are turned off for the trusted profile in
portable services but none of the passwd/group and nss files are mapped to the
s
Hi,
On 2021-09-20, 5:19 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
On Mo, 20.09.21 11:24, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com)
wrote:
> Hi. Is there such thing as “pre-installed” portable services? If
> not, what is the best way to achieve it. One option can be to
Hi. Is there such thing as “pre-installed” portable services? If not, what is
the best way to achieve it. One option can be to place the files that “attach”
command creates on the distro but I am worried that the files might be outdated
depending on the systemd version the distro is shipped.
Th
On 2021-09-14, 3:43 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
On Di, 14.09.21 12:10, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com)
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We, at Axis, have a monolithic operating system backed by a
> platform. There are teams behind the
Hello,
We, at Axis, have a monolithic operating system backed by a platform. There are
teams behind the services making up the operating system and we have quite many
services. We have been investigating sandboxing these services and of course
systemd sandboxing directives are a way to go. Prob
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:49 AM Ulrich Windl <
ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
> >>> Greg KH schrieb am 02.06.2021 um 16:39 in
> Nachricht :
> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:48:41PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 02.06.21 um 07:04 schrieb Greg KH:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021
Hi. Really good initiative!
Also wanted to inform about connectedhomeip project which has an
abstraction layer for OpenSSL and Mbed TLS. Probably the layer is far from
being ready for systemd to use though.
Umut
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:51 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya!
>
> Currently, s
We had a similar problem and we solved it by using grouping for critical
services and then using startup cpu shares for services that should be
responsive within that group.
Even if you use startup cpu shares and create a target for everything you
would want to boot, some unnecessary services will
I am curious Zbigniew of how you find out if the coredump was on a starved
process?
This is common for our embedded devices. I didn't think it is common for
desktop too.
It is really useful for getting coredumps on deadlocked applications. For
that reason I don't think it is good to remove this f
Back then, this is something we have tried and it works. Not with bind
mount though. We also have SD-card as primary storage. As soon as the
storage service mounted the SD-Card, we have created a symbolink link
under /var/log to the persistent and triggered journald flush. It
worked just fine!
On
You need to do some bit analysis - https://shapeshed.com/unix-exit-codes/
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:29 PM prashantkumar dhotre
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In my journal log, I see ;
>
> 1199473 Mar 01 15:46:03 evo-qfx-01 systemd[1]: ifmand.service: Main process
> exited, code=exited, status=251/n/a
>
>
>
Also checkout systemd generators
(https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.generator.html).
A generator can overlay the /etc and generators should run before
systemd starts scanning the unit files.
Umut
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:07 PM Matt Schuckmann
wrote:
>
> Thank you all for
Thanks to you all. I wasn't aware of the stable branches. Nice to see them.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:06 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:34 AM Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are on systemd 239 and we would li
Hello,
We are on systemd 239 and we would like to patch following CVEs
without jumping to 240.
CVE-2018-16864
CVE-2018-16865
CVE-2018-16866
Can someone please help us out and point the commits that we need to
back-port since 239 was tagged?
Thanks
Umut
__
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 5:52 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Fr, 04.01.19 14:23, Sebastian Jennen (sebastian.jen...@gmx.de) wrote:
>
> > Hello systemd team,
> >
> > there is a pull request currently on systemd, which adds a .clang-format
> > support, which you can find here:
> > https://github.
Hello,
Do you know any statistics collection application for embedded
environment that has fairly working systemd and journald plugins.
There are few I can find but surprisingly none of them have deep
systemd support.
Thanks
Umut
___
systemd-devel mail
Thanks. We will prepare a patch.
Umut
On 2018-11-20, 15:51, "systemd-devel on behalf of Lennart Poettering"
wrote:
On Di, 20.11.18 12:50, Christopher Wong (christopher.w...@axis.com) wrote:
> ?Hi guys,
>
>
> We plan to place an abstraction service over systemd-time
Hey,
How come the root slice's memory accounting is not matching (or close
to) with what I see in the /sys/fs? Do we do some other special
accounting?
systemctl 239 (default-hierarchy=hybrid)
a@b:memory$ pwd
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory
a@b:memory$ systemctl show -p MemoryCurrent -- -.slice
MemoryCurr
Hi,
I am turning on PrivateDevices and as a result getting a minimal /dev
tree for my service. Then I would like to add some selected devices
with DevicePolicy=auto & DeviceAllow=/dev/cam0. As a result, I don't
see the device /dev/cam0 in the /dev tree and since the mount space is
RO, I cannot cre
Hello,
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:37 AM, Stanislav Angelovič
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Suppose we have a server whose methods may take relatively long time and I
> would like to process them asynchronously within the server, so while a
> client is waiting for reply to his time-consuming call, other c
Hello Zbigniew,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> systemd-238 has been tagged.
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/archive/v238/systemd-238.tar.gz
>
> CHANGES WITH 238:
>
> * The MemoryAccounting= unit property now defaults to on. After
>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mo, 26.02.18 08:09, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > Daemons can choose to send additional variables. However, it is recommended
>> > to prefix variable names not listed above with X_.
>> > So naturally i tried
>> >
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fr, 10.11.17 11:11, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Sa, 28.10.17 22:01, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.c
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sa, 28.10.17 22:01, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to have cpu controller on v1 and memory controller on
>> unified but it is not working the way
Hello,
I am trying to have cpu controller on v1 and memory controller on
unified but it is not working the way I am expecting. When I enable
CONFIG_MEMCG, cgroup is popping up in /proc/cgroups and
mount_cgroup_controllers() is mounting it very early. Once it is
mounted in v1, it becomes unavailabl
Hello Jason,
Just wanted to remind you that clients set a timeout for the method reply.
Don't remember off the top of my head but different implementations have
different default timeouts. Consider this when delaying the reply.
Umut
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:36 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> O
Hello,
I would like to make a method call on a remote machine with busctl
where the method returns UNIX_FD (h), type unix domain socket.
I am guessing the FD stops on stdio-bridge without any other magic
bridging the UDS to an another socket on the host. Is that the case?
Can there be any magic t
Hello,
Even though this is not a systemd problem, I believe systemd mailing
list is a good place to discuss.
Our kernel has CONFIG_MEMCG enabled. As soon as we set
DefaultMemoryAccounting=yes, our system wide memory usage increased 11
MB. The increase is mostly on kmalloc-* slab memory with the p
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Zbigniew, Lennart, all,
>
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2016-10-20 4:00 +]:
>> Open bugs with v232 milestone [1]:
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20milestone%3Av232%20-lab
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wonder why we have the following aliases/symlinks
>
> dbus-org.freedesktop.hostname1.service -> systemd-hostnamed.service
> dbus-org.freedesktop.import1.service -> systemd-importd.service
> dbus-org.freedesktop.locale1.s
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Michael Biebl [2016-05-16 4:24 +0200]:
>> Any ideas, why simple tools like loginctl, busctl, hostnamectl require 300K+
>> ?
>> Could we move more common functionality into a shared, private library
>> to counter the constant growth?
>
> Buil
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 5:43 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>
> 24.04.2016 19:24, Renjith Vijayan пишет:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am trying to make journal logs persistent across reboots in my platform.
>> Currently /var/log is mounted on volatile partition in the platform.
>> I have a non-volatile partit
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> We are using systemd to supervise our NoSQL database and are generally
> happy.
>
> A few things will help even more:
>
> 1. log core dumps immediately rather than after the dump completes
>
> A database will often consume all memory on the mach
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Martin Townsend
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I wouldn't really call this system stripped down, it
> has an nginx webserver, DHCP server, postgresql-server, sftp server, a few
> mono (C#) daemons running, loads quite a few kernel modules during boot,
> d
Hi,
src/shared & src/basic have very useful code that upstream have been static
linking to most binaries. My understanding is that we haven’t been feeling
comfortable about the API to make these paths a standalone library (or include
them in libsystemd).
Now that we started duplicating the cod
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 12.02.16 23:12, Mikhail Kasimov (mikhail.kasi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> 12.02.2016 22:57, Lennart Poettering пишет:
>> > On Fri, 12.02.16 22:28, Mikhail Kasimov (mikhail.kasi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >
>> >>> TimeoutStopSec=
I think so :) Better than giving wrong information.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2015-11-19 11:17 GMT+01:00 Umut Tezduyar Lindskog :
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:13 AM, David Herrmann
>> wrote:
>
>>> * systemd will now bump the
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:13 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hey!
>
> We just tagged a new release, slightly delayed due to the conference.
> It includes several new features, some old cruft removed, and many
> bugfixes!
>
> CHANGES WITH 228:
>
> * A number of properties previously only setta
Hey,
bus_event_loop_with_idle seems very useful function in terms of
shutting down services race free and it is both for kdbus/dbus-daemon.
Any plans making it public?
Umut
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> On 3 November 2015 at 06:27, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> journalctl --list-boots seems great actually but wouldn't work for us.
>> We cannot keep lots of logs in our products.
>>
>
> You shouldn
This is due to both services (getty@tty1.service and remote-fs.target)
having [Install] section.
I do not know why these services are not shipped without the [Install]
section like the rest of the other systemd services.
Umut
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Johan x Lundin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> O
me to a file and the file gets preserved over reboot.
Umut
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 02.11.15 15:46, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We would like to implement a feature to keep track of accumulate
Hi,
We would like to implement a feature to keep track of accumulated
values of uptimes in our products. Tracked time will give us the total
usage time of our product not just since last reboot (/proc/uptime).
Is upstream interested in having such implementation?
Umut
___
I am not sure if automount is really the right way to go. In the end,
your automount path will fail if your device is not plugged in.
You could always use udev rules (ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}='media-ext.mount')
to mount the volume.
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.device.html
Umu
Fantastic! Tried to purchase a ticket but seems like PayPal is the
only supported payment. Is this a glitch?
Umut
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya!
>
> The first systemd conference, systemd.conf, will take place on
> November 5th-7th, 2015 at betahaus in Berlin-K
For the reference, this problem is tracked @
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/406
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 18.06.15 17:33, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:20:04PM +0200, Lennart Poette
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 11:30 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> IMPORTANT: Man page says "This interface is private to systemd and
>> should not be used in external projects." for /run/systemd/private. I
>> am not
You can use PID 1's DBUS API -
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/dbus/. Particularly
you should be interested in NJobs and Progress property.
Since it is too late to wait for DBus to come up you need to connect
to systemd directly (instead of going through dbus-daemon). The socket
y
Hi,
We recently have reimplemented a central component of our software
stack with sd-bus and the results are very satisfactory. Though, we
have some feedback to discuss.
The reimplemented component is a glib based application. For this
reason, we have integrated GMain with sd-event (using Tom's s
Hi,
I have noticed that glib vs sd-bus have different hierarchy in terms
of how objects are stacked. I don't have any argument why one or the
other one would be better but I was wondering what the reason for this
difference.
"/com/a/b" registered with sd_bus_add_object_vtable
Introspection:
└─/co
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-May/032473.html
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Michael Olbrich
wrote:
> ---
> src/shared/random-util.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/shared/random-util.c b/src/shared/random-util.c
> index 88f5182508e7..b
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:12 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> As of today we've disabled git-push to fd.o. The official development
> git repository is now at github [1]. The old repository will still be
> back-synced, but we had to disable push-access to avoid getting
> out-of-sync with github.
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 29.05.15 00:24, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
> wrote:
>
>> On 28 May 2015 at 18:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > On Thu, 28.05.15 16:42, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
>> > wrote:
>> >
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 28.05.15 13:56, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduya
---
src/shared/random-util.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/random-util.c b/src/shared/random-util.c
index 88f5182..b230044 100644
--- a/src/shared/random-util.c
+++ b/src/shared/random-util.c
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#ifdef HAVE_SYS_AUX
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
>>>> > On May 28, 2015 2:28 PM, wrote:
>>>> >> I'm working on an embedded system, and I ran into a situation where
>>
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Thu, 28 May 2015 17:21:14 -0700
> aaron_wri...@selinc.com пишет:
>
>> Brandon Philips wrote on 05/28/2015 05:10:33 PM:
>> > Access to the system dbus is controlled by dbus policies. You will
>> > need to write a policy for giving this u
---
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/sd-bus.c | 26 +++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/sd-bus.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/sd-bus.c
index edc27ae..a6096f9 100644
--- a/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/sd-bus.c
+++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/sd-bus.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> On 28 May 2015 at 12:56, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>>&g
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduya
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked
>> service?
>
> Well, so far our thinking wa
Hi,
The for (;;) loop in server_process_datagram might prevent journal
from feeding the watchdog if there is always something to receive in
the syslog socket. Potentially journald is restarted, applications
stall if the syslog socket is staying full
I thought about fixing it by checking the w
Hi Charles,
We have done something similar to this with the cpu accounting. The
option is --cpu=TYPE (There is also hidden key '%' on the tty output
which toggles between different display modes). If this patch will be
taken I think we should be consistent. Maybe something like --io=TYPE
or --memo
Hi,
I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked service?
Vendor default masked service has advantages like:
- systemctl start won't work
- dbus activation won't work
It is common that an embedded system doesn't use packages, rather it
ships everything in monolithic image.
Allowed interface name is relatively small. Lets not make
users go in to the source code to figure out what happened.
--machine=debian-tree conflicts with
--machine=debian-tree2
ex: Failed to add new veth \
interfaces (host0, vb-debian-tree): File exists
---
src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 2 +-
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
> and I am experiencing different problem in the same device logic.
>
> I am at 219 + 628c89cc + 496068a8 + 5259bcf6
>
> I have 2 m
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 19.05.15 10:23, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a better fix now.
>>
>> > So the problem is that this tentative → dead transition only works if
>> > a device is referenced once, but causes
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 18.05.15 15:59, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
>> and I am experiencing different problem in
Hi,
There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
and I am experiencing different problem in the same device logic.
I am at 219 + 628c89cc + 496068a8 + 5259bcf6
I have 2 mounts (one is bind mount) on mapper device.
/proc/self/mountinfo:
47 37 254:0 / /var/spool/storage/SD
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Simon McVittie
> wrote:
>> On 29/04/15 15:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>>> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
>
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:08:50PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
>> using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. Fo
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Simon McVittie
wrote:
> On 29/04/15 15:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
>> using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon.
> ...
>> gdbus.c
>> -
Hi,
We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. For this reason, we have high
interest in using sd-bus. What are the plans in terms of making sd-bus
API public?
Details of the test [2]:
gdbus.c
- g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()
It is not uncommon that file systems have the same volume label,
especially on flash drives. disk/by-label udev rule in
60-persistent-storage.rules generates a symb link to the device. 2
devices might have the same label link if they have same label.
After 628c89cc, this becomes very visible with
My two cents is feature can be implemented as long as we get support
from the application. For example sd-event has the builtin support to
quit when it is idle. Systemd can pass the exit-on-idle timeout to the
application via env variables so the event loop can configure itself
to quit.
I am not s
Hi,
I would like to pass the time it was spent in bootloader to systemd.
Is there a kernel command line to pass this information on non EFI
bootloader? Or is there an another way?
Umut
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
h
Getting inspiration from what you are proposing, you can already forward
messages to a datagram socket (syslog). You could implement a program to
empty out the datagram socket and only write the messages you want. Syslog
format doesnt know anything about FIELD though. One down side of this
implemen
ur patch solves this problem too. Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
>> What does this fix Jeff, could you please explain?
>
> Here's the relevant part of a pkg-config file
What does this fix Jeff, could you please explain?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Generate pkg-config files during configure as God (Havoc) intended. This fixes
> all of systemd's pkg-config files when cross-compiling (and possibly other use
> cases).
>
> (Note: I might've m
systemd-cgtop --dept=1 -b -n 10 -d 0.1 | cat
Assertion 'new_length >= 3' failed at src/shared/util.c:3 \
595, function ellipsize_mem(). Aborting.
Aborted (core dumped)
---
src/cgtop/cgtop.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c
i
Hi,
How do I add a slice that is inside the system.slice?
Following slice gets nested to -.slice where I want to nest it inside
system.slice (just like instantaneous service slices).
hello.slice
[Unit]
Description=hello slice
I tried following which produced the correct output with "systemctl
s
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 04.03.15 18:51, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> If i run a transient scope on the user systemd instance like:
>>
>> $ systemd-run --user --scope true
>>
>> Then the scope seems to live past the end of the process
Hi Marko,
On Sunday, March 1, 2015, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran into a use case where the activation phase of a service takes
> significantly longer than the desired watchdog period (Activating:
> 10-20secs, Watchdog: 1-5secs).
>
> I found out that the watchdog features start
Otherwise every daemon reload prints out warnings like:
systemd[1]: Unit type .busname is not supported on this system.
systemd[1]: Unit type .swap is not supported on this system.
---
src/core/manager.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/core/manager.c b/src/
Hi Susant,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Susant Sahani wrote:
> This patch adds support for RFC 5424 syslog format to journald. Journald
> can now forward logs to a multicast UDP group.
>
> RFC 5424 format:
> VERSION SP TIMESTAMP SP HOSTNAME SP APP-NAME SP PROCID SP MSGID SP
> [SD-ID]s SP MSG
For the reference, LTO doesn't work with systemd 218 on mips:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-December/026326.html
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> LTO may be unreliable, does not work properly in several archs
> It may crash or produce wrong c
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info "Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s" is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
This also optimizes the startup tiny bit since we have udev
rules running on network devices a
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:50:01PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
>> info "Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s" is
>> vis
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info "Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s" is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
src/sysctl/sysctl.c | 32
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info "Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s" is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
src/sysctl/sysctl.c | 34 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions
Hi,
What you have figured out is so far the only way if you want to have
dynamic targets.
If you do not use "--no-block" to start your second target, first
target will never finish.
Other caveat of your way is that systemd doesn't know about your final
target until it receives "systemctl start des
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 26.01.15 14:00, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> condition_test_needs_update() wants the timestamp of /usr to be newer
>> than what is being checked.
>&g
1 - 100 of 396 matches
Mail list logo
