[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

Heya! Many many improvements, in particular in the area of containers, btrfs hookup, and networkd. Also, many bugfixes. Enjoy! http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-219.tar.xz Note that this version is not available in Fedora F22/F23 yet. The linker on ARM segfaults. Since the i386

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

В Mon, 16 Feb 2015 23:59:56 +0100 Lennart Poettering пишет: > > * When a .mount unit refers to a mount point on which multiple > mounts are stacked, and the .mount unit is stopped all of > the stacked mount points will now be unmounted until no > mount point

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Tue, 17.02.15 06:53, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > В Mon, 16 Feb 2015 23:59:56 +0100 > Lennart Poettering пишет: > > > > > * When a .mount unit refers to a mount point on which multiple > > mounts are stacked, and the .mount unit is stopped all of > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

Hello, Dnia poniedziałek, 16 lutego 2015 23:59:56 Lennart Poettering pisze: > > Note that this version is not available in Fedora F22/F23 yet. The > linker on ARM segfaults. Since the i386 and x86_64 versions built > fine, I decided to release 219 anyway. > I was able to build systemd v219 bot

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Tue, 17.02.15 17:13, Maciej Wereski (m.were...@partner.samsung.com) wrote: > Hello, > > Dnia poniedziałek, 16 lutego 2015 23:59:56 Lennart Poettering pisze: > > > > > Note that this version is not available in Fedora F22/F23 yet. The > > linker on ARM segfaults. Since the i386 and x86_64 ver

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

Hi Lennart, On 2015-02-16 23:59, Lennart Poettering wrote: > * journald now sets the special FS_NOCOW file flag for its > journal files. This should improve performance on btrfs, by > avoiding heavy fragmentation when journald's write-pattern > is used on COW

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

Lennart Poettering wrote on 17/02/15 10:08: >> > mount something-else /foo >> > systemctl start foo.mount > In this case the second line is a NOP, since the first line already > mounted something on /foo, and thus made foo.mount active. So, even if foo.mount (the actual unit file) specifies it's W

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > On 2015-02-16 23:59, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > * journald now sets the special FS_NOCOW file flag for its > > journal files. This should improve performance on btrfs, by > > avoid

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

В Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:14:44 +0100 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > > Hi Lennart, > > > > On 2015-02-16 23:59, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > * journald now sets the special FS_NOCOW file flag for its > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:22:38AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > В Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:14:44 +0100 > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > > > Hi Lennart, > > > > > > On 2015-02-16 23:59, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Tue, 17.02.15 23:30, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > Lennart Poettering wrote on 17/02/15 10:08: > >> > mount something-else /foo > >> > systemctl start foo.mount > > In this case the second line is a NOP, since the first line already > > mounted something on /foo, and thus made f

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Tue, 17.02.15 20:05, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > On 2015-02-16 23:59, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > * journald now sets the special FS_NOCOW file flag for its > > journal files. This should improve performance on btrfs, by > > a

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Wed, 18.02.15 06:22, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > В Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:14:44 +0100 > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > > > Hi Lennart, > > > > > > On 2015-02-16 23:59, Lennart Poettering wrote:

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

2015-02-18 12:07 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Wed, 18.02.15 06:22, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> btrfs checksumming theoretically allows you to transparently recover >> after media corruption if filesystem has redundancy (more than one copy >> of data). Journald checks

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Wed, 18.02.15 12:13, Joonas Sarajärvi (m...@iki.fi) wrote: > 2015-02-18 12:07 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > > On Wed, 18.02.15 06:22, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > > >> > >> btrfs checksumming theoretically allows you to transparently recover > >> after media corruption if

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

2015-02-18 12:19 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Wed, 18.02.15 12:13, Joonas Sarajärvi (m...@iki.fi) wrote: > >> 2015-02-18 12:07 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : >> > On Wed, 18.02.15 06:22, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> >> >> >> btrfs checksumming theoretically allows you

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:03:39AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Well it's the only logic that can work really, already since the same > device node is usually known to the kernel by a different name thatn > to userspace. Trying to always map that is really nasty, as one can > see with the GPT

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

Dnia wtorek, 17 lutego 2015 17:23:55 Lennart Poettering pisze: > On Tue, 17.02.15 17:13, Maciej Wereski (m.were...@partner.samsung.com) wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Dnia poniedziałek, 16 lutego 2015 23:59:56 Lennart Poettering pisze: > > > Note that this version is not available in Fedora F22/F23 ye

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

Hi Lennart On 2015-02-18 11:19, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 18.02.15 12:13, Joonas Sarajärvi (m...@iki.fi) wrote: > > > FS_NOCOW does no effect btrfs raid settings. If you want this kind of > data redundancy then it will continue to be available even though we > set FS_NOCOW now. Whitou

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Wed, 18.02.15 06:22, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidjaar at gmail.com ) wrote: >/В Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:14:44 +0100 />/Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > пишет: />//>/> On Tue, Feb 17,

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

On Wed, 03.05.17 22:57, Florian Kerle (flo.ke...@gmx.at) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > it's correct, that checksums are not suitable to recover a file; > BUT when using btrfs RAID, checksums are used to determine which copy of the > file is malformed. > (and restore it, if any redundant OK copy exist