On Thu, 10.04.14 10:21, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
> Am 10.04.2014 03:35, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >> Simply try:
> >> int func(...) {
> >> static bool network_namespace_warning = false;
> >> ...
> >>
> >> if (!network_namespace_warning) {
> >> netw
'Twas brillig, and Tollef Fog Heen at 10/04/14 07:53 did gyre and gimble:
> ]] Lennart Poettering
>
>> Maybe we shouldn't bother too much with making this one-time. Maybe
>> instead we should print it all the time, but simply at debug log level,
>> so that this isnt too visible...
>
> It's just
Am 10.04.2014 03:35, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>> Simply try:
>> int func(...) {
>> static bool network_namespace_warning = false;
>> ...
>>
>> if (!network_namespace_warning) {
>> network_namespace_warning = true;
>> log_warn("...");
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Zbyszek
]] Lennart Poettering
> Maybe we shouldn't bother too much with making this one-time. Maybe
> instead we should print it all the time, but simply at debug log level,
> so that this isnt too visible...
It's just when starting services, isn't it? I think we should log it
each time at a visible pr
On Thu, 10.04.14 01:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 09.04.14 11:21, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 09.04.14 11:21, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> > Several units now utilize the Priv
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 09.04.14 11:21, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > Several units now utilize the PrivateNetwork parameter, which requires
>> > network namespace support.
>
> BTW
On Wed, 09.04.14 11:21, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > Several units now utilize the PrivateNetwork parameter, which requires
> > network namespace support.
BTW, this really sounds like something where we should have graceful
deg
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Several units now utilize the PrivateNetwork parameter, which requires
> network namespace support.
Applied. Thanks!
Cheers,
Tom
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Several units now utilize the PrivateNetwork parameter, which requires
network namespace support.
---
README | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/README b/README
index fc13e10..cecbcbf 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
create additional sym
10 matches
Mail list logo
