Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: Looking for known memory leaks triggered by stress testing add/remove/up/down interfaces

2021-02-19 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 19.02.21 08:44, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote: > >>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 18.02.2021 um 19:30 > in > Nachricht : > ... > > entry instead of asking for new memory again. This allocation cache is > > a bit quicker then going to malloc() all the time, but

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: Looking for known memory leaks triggered by stress testing add/remove/up/down interfaces

2021-02-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.02.21 um 08:44 schrieb Ulrich Windl: Lennart Poettering schrieb am 18.02.2021 um 19:30 in Nachricht : ... entry instead of asking for new memory again. This allocation cache is a bit quicker then going to malloc() all the time, but means if you just watch the heap you'll assume

[systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: Looking for known memory leaks triggered by stress testing add/remove/up/down interfaces

2021-02-18 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 18.02.2021 um 19:30 in Nachricht : ... > entry instead of asking for new memory again. This allocation cache is > a bit quicker then going to malloc() all the time, but means if you > just watch the heap you'll assume there's a leak even though there > isn't