I'm going to set a high bar for you here:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Poelzleithner
wrote:
>
> I'm currently implementing a dynamic linux kernel optimizer called
> ulatencyd [1]. In my opinion the desktop experience (which applies to
> servers as well) can be much improved by dynamic
Dnia wtorek, 19 kwietnia 2011 o 13:22:06 Stef Bon napisał(a):
> Well, your email suprises me, really.
> Yes I read some sort of apologies, but he is expecting someone is
> dissapointed he's not reacting. If that's not arrogant, I'm a marsian.
There is a difference between ‘it might sound disappoin
Well, your email suprises me, really.
Yes I read some sort of apologies, but he is expecting someone is
dissapointed he's not reacting. If that's not arrogant, I'm a marsian.
I will raise a fund to support all of those who are dissapointed by
him not reacting... Yek
Much better would be just: I c
On 04/18/2011 11:04 PM, Stef Bon wrote:
2011/1/17 Lennart Poettering:
possible is via xattr support in procfs and cgroupfs.
Anyway, as mentioned, I am not really ready to discuss this now. Sorry
of that might sound disappointing.
Why do think anyone is disappointed, by you not reacting? Do y
2011/1/17 Lennart Poettering :
> possible is via xattr support in procfs and cgroupfs.
>
> Anyway, as mentioned, I am not really ready to discuss this now. Sorry
> of that might sound disappointing.
>
Why do think anyone is disappointed, by you not reacting? Do you
really think that
I'snt it
On Thu, 13.01.11 18:29, Daniel Poelzleithner (poe...@poelzi.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently implementing a dynamic linux kernel optimizer called
> ulatencyd [1]. In my opinion the desktop experience (which applies to
> servers as well) can be much improved by dynamically adjusting the the
> k
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for getting in touch.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Daniel Poelzleithner wrote:
> What is currently unknown on the other hand is the current active X
> window in use. This could be done by connecting tho X and reacting to
> events there, but I think a cleaner approach would
Hi,
I'm currently implementing a dynamic linux kernel optimizer called
ulatencyd [1]. In my opinion the desktop experience (which applies to
servers as well) can be much improved by dynamically adjusting the the
kernel. Having a very fair scheduler is a very good thing, but this is
not the best ex
