On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:48:36 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 17.03.11 10:20, Mike Kazantsev (mk.frag...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:39:19 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Experiencing several reboots on a machine with
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:58:00 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 17.03.11 22:48, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Unfortunately, new rsyslog.service (and services using systemctl stop
directly) can affect such display, which I think shows the
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
Something like systemctl --enabled would certainly be much more
useful for such cases than the current systemctl --all, yet
there will still be a lot of oneshot stuff, which are supposed to be
dead, so a separate
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:52:21 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
Something like systemctl --enabled would certainly be much more
useful for such cases than the current systemctl --all, yet
there will
On Thu, 17.03.11 10:20, Mike Kazantsev (mk.frag...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:39:19 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 24.02.11 13:55, Mike Kazantsev (mk.frag...@gmail.com) wrote:
Something like systemctl --enabled would certainly be much more
On Thu, 17.03.11 22:48, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Unfortunately, new rsyslog.service (and services using systemctl stop
directly) can affect such display, which I think shows the flawed
assumption that enabled in systemd means should be active,
period (with the
On Thu, 17.03.11 09:52, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
I understand that there's already a looong TODO, but maybe it's possible
to cram such systemctl view option(s) somewhere in that list?
I was vaguely thinking about adding generic selection option to
replace current
On Thu, 17.03.11 12:52, Mike Kazantsev (mk.frag...@gmail.com) wrote:
--query Type=socket,dbus
The latter is probably the way to go as it can be used to implement
any custom query. And add better output format control of course :) It
just needs some proper, but not too complicated,
2011/3/17 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Hmm, I am not convinced we want to come up with our own matching syntax
there.
A different approach might be to just use awk here. awk has been
invented for this kind of matching. So it might be nicer to just have a
mode where we have an
On Thu, 24.02.11 13:55, Mike Kazantsev (mk.frag...@gmail.com) wrote:
Something like systemctl --enabled would certainly be much more
useful for such cases than the current systemctl --all, yet
there will still be a lot of oneshot stuff, which are supposed to be
dead, so a separate state for
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:39:19 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 24.02.11 13:55, Mike Kazantsev (mk.frag...@gmail.com) wrote:
Something like systemctl --enabled would certainly be much more
useful for such cases than the current systemctl --all, yet
there will
Good day,
With systemd on a non-desktop machine, I've stumbled upon such issue:
some services that should be running start and then exit with error
code 0 for some reason, usually unrelated to systemd (in my case it was
a bogus SIGTERM, sent to a wrong process group, but I believe I've
seen it
12 matches
Mail list logo
