On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:11:47 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
That'd make all the systems with currently enabled services
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:35:35 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:11:47 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:34:19 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
But what about the other direction? We definitely want network.target in
the boot transaction if NM or network.service is part of it
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:11:47 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
That'd make all the systems with currently enabled services in
network.target.wants misconfigured - network should fail on these
unless
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 16.03.11 14:39, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
Or is rsyslog expected to provide a symlink in syslog.target.wants?
This is really orthogonal. As Lennart commented, it may be sensible to
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:04:35 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
If DefaultDependencies= is yes (which it is by default) for target
units then they'll automatically gain an After= for all untis they
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:41:34 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:04:35 +0100
Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:32:26 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:41:34 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Mike Kazantsev
On Thu, 17.03.11 14:32, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
Ah, I missed the target units part, but even then
Requires=network.target + After=network.target is a common
enough pattern for services that need network to be up at startup and
After= line is present in each one of
On Thu, 17.03.11 12:39, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
(We currently do not document what DefaultDependencies= actually means
for the specific unit types. We probably should...)
Yes, please.
BTW I remember there were other magic directories besides xxx.wanted,
should not
On Thu, 17.03.11 23:28, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
(We currently do not document what DefaultDependencies= actually means
for the specific unit types. We probably should...)
Can this behavior be relied upon or this might change in future
releases?
Yes.
On Thu, 17.03.11 23:28, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Thu, 17.03.11 13:06, Mike Kazantsev (mk.frag...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:04:35 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 16.03.11 14:39, Andrey Borzenkov
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:34:19 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
But what about the other direction? We definitely want network.target in
the boot transaction if NM or network.service is part of it too. Because
only then the network consuming services can be synchronized
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/12 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
2011/3/11 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Mike Kazantsev
14 matches
Mail list logo
