On Thu, 17.03.11 23:28, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: > On Thu, 17.03.11 13:06, Mike Kazantsev (mk.frag...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:04:35 +0100 > > Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 16.03.11 14:39, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote: > > > > > > > > Or is rsyslog expected to provide a symlink in syslog.target.wants? > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is really orthogonal. As Lennart commented, it may be sensible to > > > > do both. But this symlink does not ensure syslog is actually started > > > > before syslog.target. > > > > > > Well, actually there is. > > > > > > If DefaultDependencies= is "yes" (which it is by default) for target > > > units then they'll automatically gain an After= for all untis they have > > > Wants= or Requires= on. > > > > > > (We currently do not document what DefaultDependencies= actually means > > > for the specific unit types. We probably should...) > > > > > > > Can this behavior be relied upon or this might change in future > > releases? > > Yes.
Hah, turns out this is actually already documented, in systemd.target(5) where it should be. So yupp, it's so reliable, that this is already documented since a while ;-) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
